Autotransplants in leukemia: current state, future progress.

R P Gale, A Butturini, P Reizenstein
Author Information
  1. R P Gale: Department of Medicine, UCLA School of Medicine 90024-1678.

Abstract

Autotransplants in leukemia are controversial; their rationale and results have been questioned. Here we consider several issues central to this debate: (1) Are there convincing data to suggest that more intensive therapy increases cures? (2) Are results post-autotransplant a consequence of the transplant, or do they reflect subject-selection and time-to-treatment (time censoring) biases? (3) Does leukemia relapse after an autotransplant develop from persisting leukemia cells in the subject or the graft? (4) Do autotransplants using hematopoietic stem cells from different sources have distinct outcomes? (5) Are immune-mediated anti-leukemia mechanisms likely to prevent relapse after autotransplants? and (6) Can comparably intensive therapy be given without an autotransplant?

MeSH Term

Bone Marrow Transplantation
Cyclophosphamide
Etoposide
Graft vs Host Disease
Hematopoietic Stem Cells
Humans
Leukemia
Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute
Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma
Transplantation, Autologous
Twins, Monozygotic

Chemicals

Etoposide
Cyclophosphamide

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0leukemiaAutotransplantsresultsintensivetherapyrelapsecellscontroversialrationalequestionedconsiderseveralissuescentraldebate:1convincingdatasuggestincreasescures?2post-autotransplantconsequencetransplantreflectsubject-selectiontime-to-treatmenttimecensoringbiases?3autotransplantdeveloppersistingsubjectgraft?4autotransplantsusinghematopoieticstemdifferentsourcesdistinctoutcomes?5immune-mediatedanti-leukemiamechanismslikelypreventautotransplants?6Cancomparablygivenwithoutautotransplant?leukemia:currentstatefutureprogress

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.