Value of bone scanning in the follow-up of breast cancer patients. A study of 1000 cases.

H Schünemann, P J Langecker, W Ellgas, A Leonhardt, H Merkl
Author Information
  1. H Schünemann: Onkologische Klinik Bad Trissl im Tumorzentrum München, Federal Republic of Germany.

Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess the value of routine bone scintigrams, independent of the primary tumor stage or the presence of symptoms, in the postsurgical follow-up of breast cancer patients for the early detection of bone metastases. For this purpose 1,000 patients with postsurgical breast cancer without previous documentation of metastatic disease, who were admitted to the special oncology hospital, Onkologische Klinik Bad Trissl, entered a prospective study in 1987-1988. The parameters followed were the TNM stage of the primary tumor, the presence of pain, bone pain as revealed by a thorough physical examination, and the patient's history for the assessment of risk factors. In addition, a whole-body skeletal scintigram, supplementary X-rays, and additional diagnostic measures were performed, if necessary, to detect bone metastases. It was shown that in 856 of 894 patients (groups 1-6) without clinical symptoms, the clinical examination and radiological and scintigraphic diagnostic measurements, demonstrating the absence of bone metastases, gave matching results, but in 12 of the 894 patients the results of all examinations remained questionable. In another 12 of the 894 patients (groups 1-3) radiological and/or scintigraphical evidence for the presence of bone metastases was found. In 14 of 79 cases (groups 7-10) with clinically suspicious symptoms these were proven to be signs of metastases by subsequent scintigrams, supplementary X-rays, and additional diagnostic measures. In 65 of the 79 patients with clinically suspicious symptoms, bone metastases could not be confirmed by obtaining bone scintigrams or X-rays while in the other 14 patients (groups 9 and 10) evidence for the presence of bone metastases was found in the scintigrams and/or X-rays. However, 10 of these 14 patients were high-risk patients for developing bone metastases as they had axillary lymph node infiltration. The other 4 patients were of the low-risk group as they had positive receptor status or no axillary lymph node infiltration at the time of primary diagnosis. In 13 of 27 patients (groups 11-14) with clinical symptoms indicating the presence of bone metastases this diagnosis was confirmed by scintigrams and/or X-rays (groups 11 and 12), while it was possible to exclude the presence of bone metastases in spite of the symptoms in 11 of the 27 patients. In the other 3 patients the results of the additional examinations remained questionable.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

References

  1. Br J Surg. 1983 Sep;70(9):517-8 [PMID: 6616153]
  2. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Apr 27;290(6477):1229-30 [PMID: 3921166]
  3. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1984;4(4):303-7 [PMID: 6518296]
  4. Acta Chir Scand. 1982;148(5):401-4 [PMID: 7180336]
  5. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1985 May 25;115(21):714-21 [PMID: 3892660]
  6. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1984 Jul;20(7):877-80 [PMID: 6540189]
  7. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1987 Jun;23(6):779-81 [PMID: 3115785]
  8. Br J Surg. 1969 Oct;56(10):757-64 [PMID: 5354800]
  9. Onkologie. 1988 Oct;11(5):202-10 [PMID: 2849077]
  10. Clin Oncol. 1980 Sep;6(3):225-30 [PMID: 7428199]
  11. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1976 Sep;143(3):360-4 [PMID: 959955]
  12. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1986 Aug 1;111(31-32):1191-9 [PMID: 3732072]
  13. Br J Surg. 1979 Oct;66(10):752-4 [PMID: 509054]
  14. Cancer. 1987 Apr 15;59(8):1524-9 [PMID: 3545442]
  15. Surgery. 1983 Feb;93(2):328-9 [PMID: 6823673]
  16. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1989 Jan 6;114(1):3-8 [PMID: 2535982]
  17. J Clin Oncol. 1986 Mar;4(3):389-94 [PMID: 3485185]
  18. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1988 May;48(5):292-8 [PMID: 3396831]
  19. Cancer. 1985 Jan 1;55(1):202-5 [PMID: 3965082]
  20. Dan Med Bull. 1977 Sep;24(4):151-3 [PMID: 923296]
  21. Ir J Med Sci. 1982 Jan;151(1):1-5 [PMID: 7107167]
  22. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1982 Jun 11;107(23):890-5 [PMID: 6282557]
  23. Lancet. 1976 Jan 31;1(7953):237-9 [PMID: 55541]
  24. Cancer. 1984 Nov 15;54(10):2243-7 [PMID: 6488143]
  25. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1979 Oct;149(4):523-5 [PMID: 483128]
  26. Clin Radiol. 1985 May;36(3):279-82 [PMID: 4064511]
  27. N Engl J Med. 1977 Aug 11;297(6):300-3 [PMID: 876312]
  28. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1974 Oct;122(2):313-7 [PMID: 4371591]
  29. Br J Surg. 1979 Oct;66(10):749-51 [PMID: 509053]
  30. Dan Med Bull. 1984 Feb;31(1):63-7 [PMID: 6697779]
  31. Cancer. 1979 Mar;43(3):956-60 [PMID: 427736]
  32. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1976;2(1):69-73 [PMID: 934030]
  33. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1987 Oct 17;117(42):1615-9 [PMID: 3423756]
  34. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1984 Oct 26;109(43):1639-42 [PMID: 6149114]
  35. Tumori. 1987 Oct 31;73(5):463-5 [PMID: 3686679]
  36. JAMA. 1979 Oct 19;242(16):1747-8 [PMID: 480600]
  37. Cancer. 1979 Dec;44(6):2039-43 [PMID: 509388]
  38. Cancer. 1983 Jun 15;51(12 Suppl):2446-7 [PMID: 6850521]
  39. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1984 Mar 2;109(9):326-9 [PMID: 6697927]
  40. Cancer. 1980 Aug 15;46(4 Suppl):977-9 [PMID: 7397676]
  41. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1988 May 27;113(21):877-8 [PMID: 3286185]
  42. Lancet. 1980 Feb 9;1(8163):296-7 [PMID: 6101748]

MeSH Term

Bone Neoplasms
Bone and Bones
Breast Neoplasms
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Neoplasm Staging
Prospective Studies
Radiography
Radionuclide Imaging
Risk Factors