Responding of pigeons under variable-interval schedules of signaled-delayed reinforcement: effects of delay-signal duration.

D W Schaal, M N Branch
Author Information
  1. D W Schaal: University of Florida.

Abstract

Two experiments with pigeons examined the relation of the duration of a signal for delay ("delay signal") to rates of key pecking. The first employed a multiple schedule comprised of two components with equal variable-interval 60-s schedules of 27-s delayed food reinforcement. In one component, a short (0.5-s) delay signal, presented immediately following the key peck that began the delay, was increased in duration across phases; in the second component the delay signal initially was equal to the length of the programmed delay (27 s) and was decreased across phases. Response rates prior to delays were an increasing function of delay-signal duration. As the delay signal was decreased in duration, response rates were generally higher than those obtained under identical delay-signal durations as the signal was increased in duration. In Experiment 2 a single variable-interval 60-s schedule of 27-s delayed reinforcement was used. Delay-signal durations were again increased gradually across phases. As in Experiment 1, response rates increased as the delay-signal duration was increased. Following the phase during which the signal lasted the entire delay, shorter delay-signal-duration conditions were introduced abruptly, rather than gradually as in Experiment 1, to determine whether the gradual shortening of the delay signal accounted for the differences observed in response rates under identical delay-signal conditions in Experiment 1. Response rates obtained during the second exposures to the conditions with shorter signals were higher than those observed under identical conditions as the signal duration was increased, as in Experiment 1. In both experiments, rates and patterns of responding during delays varied greatly across subjects and were not systematically related to delay-signal durations. The effects of the delay signal may be related to the signal's role as a discriminative stimulus for adventitiously reinforced intradelay behavior, or the delay signal may have served as a conditioned reinforcer by virtue of the temporal relation between it and presentation of food.

References

  1. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Sep;42(2):239-53 [PMID: 16812387]
  2. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 May;29(3):385-92 [PMID: 670855]
  3. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Jan;27(1):119-25 [PMID: 16811969]
  4. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Sep;7:383-5 [PMID: 14218297]
  5. J Exp Anal Behav. 1975 Jul;24(1):59-72 [PMID: 16811864]
  6. J Exp Psychol. 1951 Jan;41(1):62-73 [PMID: 14814269]
  7. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jan;4:57-71 [PMID: 13741096]
  8. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1964 Jun;57:373-80 [PMID: 14155374]
  9. J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Nov;26(3):395-404 [PMID: 16811955]
  10. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Jul;50(1):33-54 [PMID: 16812548]
  11. Am J Psychol. 1950 Apr;63(2):237-43 [PMID: 15410886]
  12. Science. 1964 Nov 20;146(3647):1071-2 [PMID: 14202465]
  13. J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Nov;26(3):441-9 [PMID: 16811959]
  14. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Sep;30(2):169-75 [PMID: 16812096]
  15. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 May;21(3):433-44 [PMID: 16811755]
  16. J Exp Psychol. 1953 Apr;45(4):218-24 [PMID: 13052854]
  17. J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 May;10(3):271-6 [PMID: 6056800]
  18. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Jul;36(1):61-74 [PMID: 16812232]
  19. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Mar;35(2):145-52 [PMID: 16812205]
  20. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Jul;18(1):141-6 [PMID: 16811611]
  21. Science. 1958 Feb 28;127(3296):466-7 [PMID: 13529002]
  22. J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Mar;25(2):227-41 [PMID: 16811907]
  23. Psychol Bull. 1964 May;61:341-61 [PMID: 14146339]
  24. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 May;11(3):Suppl:327-83 [PMID: 5672248]

Grants

  1. R01 DA004074/NIDA NIH HHS
  2. DA-04074/NIDA NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Animals
Association Learning
Conditioning, Classical
Learning
Male
Memory
Mental Recall
Reaction Time
Reinforcement Schedule

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0signaldelaydurationratesincreaseddelay-signalExperimentacross1conditionsvariable-intervalphasesresponseidenticaldurationsexperimentspigeonsrelationkeyscheduleequal60-sschedules27-sdelayedfoodreinforcementcomponentseconddecreasedResponsedelayshigherobtainedgraduallyshorterobservedrelatedeffectsmayTwoexamined"delaysignal"peckingfirstemployedmultiplecomprisedtwocomponentsoneshort05-spresentedimmediatelyfollowingpeckbeganinitiallylengthprogrammed27spriorincreasingfunctiongenerally2singleusedDelay-signalFollowingphaselastedentiredelay-signal-durationintroducedabruptlyratherdeterminewhethergradualshorteningaccounteddifferencesexposuressignalspatternsrespondingvariedgreatlysubjectssystematicallysignal'srolediscriminativestimulusadventitiouslyreinforcedintradelaybehaviorservedconditionedreinforcervirtuetemporalpresentationRespondingsignaled-delayedreinforcement:

Similar Articles

Cited By