Neural coding in the chick cochlear nucleus.

M E Warchol, P Dallos
Author Information
  1. M E Warchol: Auditory Physiology Laboratory, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208.

Abstract

Physiological recordings were made from single units in the two divisions of the chick cochlear nucleus-nucleus angularis (NA) and nucleus magnocellularis (NM). Sound evoked responses were obtained in an effort to quantify functional differences between the two nuclei. In particular, it was of interest to determine if nucleus angularis and magnocellularis code for separate features of sound stimuli, such as temporal and intensity information. The principal findings are: 1. Spontaneous activity patterns in the two nuclei are very different. Neurons in nucleus angularis tend to have low spontaneous discharge rates while magnocellular units have high levels of spontaneous firing. 2. Frequency tuning curves recorded in both nuclei are similar in form, although the best thresholds of NA units are about 10 dB more sensitive than their NM counterparts across the entire frequency range. A wide spread of neural thresholds is evident in both NA and NM. 3. Large driven increases in discharge rate are seen in both NA and NM. Rate intensity functions from NM units are all monotonic, while a substantial percentage (22%) of NA units respond to increased sound level in a nonmonotonic fashion. 4. Most NA units with characteristic frequencies (CF) above 1000 Hz respond to sound stimuli at CF as 'choppers', while units with CF's below 1000 Hz are 'primary-like'. Several 'onset' units are also seen in NA. In contrast, all NM units show 'primary-like' response. 5. Units in both nuclei with CF's below 1000 Hz show strong neural phase-locking to stimuli at their CF. Above 1000 Hz, few NA units are phase-locked, while phase-locking in NM extends to 2000 Hz. 6. These results are discussed with reference to the hypothesis that NM initiates a neural pathway which codes temporal information while NA is involved primarily with intensity coding, similar in principle to the segregation of function seen in the cochlear nucleus of the barn owl (Sullivan and Konishi 1984).

References

  1. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1948 Feb;41(1):35-9 [PMID: 18904764]
  2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Nov;85(21):8311-5 [PMID: 3186725]
  3. J Comp Neurol. 1975 Dec 15;164(4):411-33 [PMID: 1206127]
  4. J Neurophysiol. 1985 Jan;53(1):201-16 [PMID: 3973658]
  5. J Neurosci. 1983 Oct;3(10):2043-53 [PMID: 6619923]
  6. J Comp Physiol A. 1989 Nov;166(1):83-95 [PMID: 2600887]
  7. J Neurosci. 1984 Jul;4(7):1781-6 [PMID: 6737040]
  8. J Neurophysiol. 1976 Mar;39(2):282-300 [PMID: 1255224]
  9. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Nov;83(21):8400-4 [PMID: 3022292]
  10. J Acoust Soc Am. 1985 Mar;77(3):1162-72 [PMID: 3980868]
  11. Z Tierpsychol. 1965 Dec;22(7):770-83 [PMID: 5874921]
  12. Exp Brain Res. 1966;1(3):220-35 [PMID: 5920550]
  13. J Neurosci. 1985 Feb;5(2):275-83 [PMID: 3973667]
  14. Naturwissenschaften. 1987 Sep;74(9):449-51 [PMID: 3683591]
  15. J Neurosci. 1983 Jul;3(7):1373-8 [PMID: 6864252]
  16. J Neurosci. 1984 Jul;4(7):1787-99 [PMID: 6737041]
  17. J Neurophysiol. 1986 Aug;56(2):261-86 [PMID: 3760921]
  18. J Neurophysiol. 1974 Jan;37(1):218-53 [PMID: 4359790]
  19. Science. 1978 May 19;200(4343):795-7 [PMID: 644324]
  20. Brain Res. 1974 Apr 26;70(3):431-47 [PMID: 4821059]
  21. Neuroscience. 1982 Apr;7(4):809-36 [PMID: 7099420]
  22. J Neurophysiol. 1980 Jul;44(1):76-96 [PMID: 7420140]
  23. J Neurophysiol. 1986 Aug;56(2):287-307 [PMID: 3760922]
  24. Naturwissenschaften. 1987 Jun;74(6):296-7 [PMID: 3627280]
  25. Hear Res. 1981 Mar;4(1):121-5 [PMID: 6162831]
  26. J Neurophysiol. 1969 Jul;32(4):613-36 [PMID: 5810617]
  27. Neuroscience. 1981;6(11):2351-65 [PMID: 7329551]
  28. J Comp Physiol A. 1985 Sep;157(2):161-81 [PMID: 3837088]

Grants

  1. NS 08635/NINDS NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Acoustic Stimulation
Action Potentials
Animals
Auditory Pathways
Auditory Threshold
Chickens
Cochlear Nerve
Male
Rhombencephalon