Informed consent in clinical research with drugs in Spain: perspective of clinical trials committee members.

R Dal-Ré
Author Information
  1. R Dal-Ré: Medical Department, Smith Kline and French SAE, Madrid, Spain.

Abstract

A survey among members of 16 Clinical Trials Committees and the Clinical Trials Evaluation Team of the Spanish Ministry of Health was carried out to discover their opinions about the procedure used to obtain informed consent in clinical research with drugs. The responses of the 111 persons surveyed indicate that 97% consider that informed consent should be obtained before the patient is included in the trial, that it must "always" be in writing (68%), and that the consent form must previously have been approved by the Clinical Trials Committee (87%). The minimum information to be provided to the patient must be read by and later supplied to the subject (76%), and for at least 90% of the members surveyed it must "always" include: an invitation to participate in the clinical trial, information about the purpose, predictable benefits and risks of the trial, the statement that participation is voluntary and that refusal to participate would not imply loss of usual medical care, and that the trial was approved by the Clinical Trials Committee. Only 33% of those surveyed considered that the study design should "always" be described to the patient. In order to find out what the general outlook on this issue is in Spain, it is necessary to perform studies among medical investigators and patients.

References

  1. J Int Med Res. 1987 Jan-Feb;15(1):2-22 [PMID: 3817279]
  2. Drug Intell Clin Pharm. 1983 Nov;17(11):828-34 [PMID: 6641508]
  3. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1988;530:144-53 [PMID: 3044218]
  4. IRB. 1982 May;4(5):1-5 [PMID: 11649407]
  5. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1987 Mar;41(3):259-65 [PMID: 3816016]
  6. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 Jul 19;293(6540):157-8 [PMID: 3089434]
  7. IRB. 1980 Oct;2(8):9-10 [PMID: 11661864]
  8. N Engl J Med. 1982 May 27;306(21):1259-62 [PMID: 7070445]
  9. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1987 Sep;42(3):250-3 [PMID: 3621780]
  10. Soc Sci Med. 1987;24(2):135-43 [PMID: 3563556]
  11. Lancet. 1989 May 6;1(8645):1008-9 [PMID: 2565477]
  12. JAMA. 1983 Nov 18;250(19):2646-8 [PMID: 6632164]
  13. Arch Intern Med. 1969 Jun;123(6):682-8 [PMID: 5771055]
  14. Lancet. 1988 Nov 12;2(8620):1128-30 [PMID: 2903336]
  15. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 Oct 25;293(6554):1065-8 [PMID: 3094776]
  16. Science. 1979 Apr 6;204(4388):11 [PMID: 373117]
  17. Am J Psychiatry. 1982 Nov;139(11):1487-9 [PMID: 6753613]
  18. JAMA. 1982 Jul 16;248(3):344-8 [PMID: 7045434]
  19. N Engl J Med. 1980 Apr 17;302(16):896-900 [PMID: 7360175]
  20. Lancet. 1985 Aug 31;2(8453):490-2 [PMID: 2863503]

MeSH Term

Clinical Trials as Topic
Ethics, Medical
Humans
Informed Consent
Spain
Surveys and Questionnaires

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0ClinicalTrialsconsentclinicaltrialmustmemberssurveyedpatient"always"amonginformedresearchdrugsapprovedCommitteeinformationparticipatemedicalsurvey16CommitteesEvaluationTeamSpanishMinistryHealthcarrieddiscoveropinionsprocedureusedobtainresponses111personsindicate97%considerobtainedincludedwriting68%formpreviously87%minimumprovidedreadlatersuppliedsubject76%least90%include:invitationpurposepredictablebenefitsrisksstatementparticipationvoluntaryrefusalimplylossusualcare33%consideredstudydesigndescribedorderfindgeneraloutlookissueSpainnecessaryperformstudiesinvestigatorspatientsInformedSpain:perspectivetrialscommittee

Similar Articles

Cited By