Effect of selective and non-selective beta blockade on pulmonary function and tracheobronchial mucociliary clearance in healthy subjects.

D Pavia, J R Bateman, A M Lennard-Jones, J E Agnew, S W Clarke
Author Information

Abstract

A controlled, double blind, crossover study was carried out to ascertain the effect of single doses of selective (100 mg atenolol) and non-selective (160 mg propranolol) beta blocker on pulmonary function and tracheobronchial mucociliary clearance. The study group comprised 12 healthy, young subjects. Adequate and comparable blockade was achieved with both drugs, the administration of which resulted in significantly lower pulse rates (at least up to eight hours after administration of the drug) and systolic blood pressures (three hours after drug administration) than were found with placebo. Small (of the order of 5%) but nevertheless statistically significant falls in FEV1 and forced vital capacity accompanied the administration of both beta blockers (but not the placebo) and were measurable up to eight hours after administration of the drug. Indices of pulmonary function had returned to normal by the next day. Peak expiratory flow and indices of small airways function remained unaltered after beta blockade. Mean tracheobronchial mucociliary clearance was depressed after administration of both beta blocking drugs, although the reduction was significant (p less than 0.05) only when propranolol was compared with placebo.

References

  1. J Appl Physiol. 1969 May;26(5):535-9 [PMID: 5781603]
  2. Respiration. 1984;45(3):286-90 [PMID: 6463391]
  3. Clin Sci. 1972 Oct;43(4):533-43 [PMID: 4653592]
  4. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1974 Apr;109(4):458-63 [PMID: 4816825]
  5. J Appl Physiol. 1975 Sep;39(3):487-95 [PMID: 240802]
  6. Pneumonologie. 1975 Sep 26;152(1-3):203-8 [PMID: 1187390]
  7. Arch Environ Health. 1976 Mar-Apr;31(2):79-82 [PMID: 4037]
  8. J Appl Physiol. 1976 Aug;41(2):146-52 [PMID: 956095]
  9. Prax Pneumol. 1976 Jun;30(6):339-43 [PMID: 967812]
  10. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1976 Oct;114(4):673-9 [PMID: 970743]
  11. Thorax. 1977 Apr;32(2):194-7 [PMID: 867333]
  12. Scand J Respir Dis. 1978 Apr;59(2):55-65 [PMID: 684380]
  13. Arch Environ Health. 1978 Jul-Aug;33(4):181-5 [PMID: 686844]
  14. Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir. 1980 May-Jun;16(3):335-66 [PMID: 6104999]
  15. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1980 May;48(5):868-71 [PMID: 7451296]
  16. Chest. 1981 Dec;80(6 Suppl):799-804 [PMID: 6118241]
  17. Chest. 1981 Dec;80(6 Suppl):827-30 [PMID: 7030659]
  18. Chest. 1981 Dec;80(6 Suppl):889-92 [PMID: 7030662]
  19. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1983 Jun;127(6):725-34 [PMID: 6859656]
  20. Eur J Respir Dis Suppl. 1983;127:41-56 [PMID: 6352300]
  21. Arch Environ Health. 1973 Feb;26(2):86-9 [PMID: 4683538]

MeSH Term

Adult
Atenolol
Blood Pressure
Bronchi
Cilia
Clinical Trials as Topic
Double-Blind Method
Female
Humans
Lung
Male
Mucus
Propranolol
Pulse
Trachea

Chemicals

Atenolol
Propranolol

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0administrationbetafunctionpulmonarytracheobronchialmucociliaryclearanceblockadehoursdrugplacebostudyselectivemgnon-selectivepropranololhealthysubjectsdrugseightsignificantcontrolleddoubleblindcrossovercarriedascertaineffectsingledoses100atenolol160blockergroupcomprised12youngAdequatecomparableachievedresultedsignificantlylowerpulseratesleastsystolicbloodpressuresthreefoundSmallorder5%neverthelessstatisticallyfallsFEV1forcedvitalcapacityaccompaniedblockersmeasurableIndicesreturnednormalnextdayPeakexpiratoryflowindicessmallairwaysremainedunalteredMeandepressedblockingalthoughreductionpless005comparedEffect

Similar Articles

Cited By