Left ventricular function in acute myocardial infarction.

P Hamosh, J N Cohn
Author Information

Abstract

Left ventricular catheterization was carried out in 40 patients with acute myocardial infarction. Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) was elevated in 85% of the patients studied. In 14 patients with apparently uncomplicated infarcts, LVEDP averaged 15 mm Hg, and cardiac index (2.98 liter/min/m(2)), stroke volume (38.3 ml/m(2)), and stroke work (49.2 g-m/m(2)) were within normal limits. In 12 patients with clinical signs of left ventricular failure, LVEDP averaged 29.9 mm Hg, cardiac index was at the lower limit of normal (2.79 liter/min/m(2)), but stroke volume (31.6 ml/m(2)) and stroke work (37.3 g-m/m(2)) were reduced. In 14 patients with clinical signs of shock, LVEDP averaged significantly lower than in the heart failure group (21.1 mm Hg), but cardiac index (1.59 liter/min/m(2)), stroke volume (16.5 ml/m(2)), and stroke work (11.1 g-m/m(2)) were markedly reduced. A large presystolic atrial "kick" (average amplitude 9.5 mm Hg) was an important factor in the high LVEDP in the patients with heart failure but not in those with shock. The first derivative of left ventricular pressure was significantly lower in shock than in the nonshock group. Although right atrial pressure (RAP) and LVEDP were significantly correlated (r = 0.49), wide discrepancies in individual patients rendered the RAP an unreliable indicator of the magnitude of left ventricular filling pressure. THESE DATA SHOW THE FOLLOWING: (a) LVEDP is usually elevated in acute myocardial infarction, even in absence of clinical heart failure; (b) cardiac output apparently is supported by increased LVEDP and compensatory tachycardia; (c) in patients with shock, left ventricular function usually is markedly impaired, but inadequate compensatory cardiac dilatation or tachycardia could contribute to the reduced cardiac output in some individuals; (d) lower LVEDP in shock than in heart failure may represent differences in left ventricular compliance.

References

  1. Circulation. 1969 Oct;40(4):483-92 [PMID: 4980883]
  2. JAMA. 1964 Dec 7;190:891-6 [PMID: 14214490]
  3. Circulation. 1967 Jun;35(6):1084-91 [PMID: 6026200]
  4. J Clin Invest. 1952 Feb;31(2):131-40 [PMID: 14907892]
  5. Circulation. 1967 Feb;35(2):316-26 [PMID: 6024300]
  6. Am Heart J. 1967 Jul;74(1):1-3 [PMID: 6027565]
  7. Circulation. 1969 Sep;40(3):277-88 [PMID: 5810887]
  8. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1968 Jul;11(1):29-44 [PMID: 4871947]
  9. Am J Cardiol. 1970 May;25(5):511-22 [PMID: 5441339]
  10. Am J Cardiol. 1970 Jan;25(1):66-9 [PMID: 5413188]
  11. Circulation. 1969 Sep;40(3):315-25 [PMID: 5817900]
  12. Circulation. 1954 Jun;9(6):847-52 [PMID: 13161112]
  13. Am J Physiol. 1956 May;185(2):355-64 [PMID: 13327051]
  14. Br Heart J. 1967 Sep;29(5):748-57 [PMID: 6039170]
  15. Circulation. 1959 May;19(5):657-61 [PMID: 13652357]
  16. Lancet. 1966 Oct 15;2(7468):837-41 [PMID: 4162173]
  17. Am J Cardiol. 1969 Apr;23(4):577-83 [PMID: 5781885]
  18. Am J Cardiol. 1969 Apr;23(4):538-47 [PMID: 5781881]
  19. Am Heart J. 1965 Jan;69:100-15 [PMID: 14256687]
  20. Am Heart J. 1959 Apr;57(4):522-9 [PMID: 13626815]
  21. Surg Forum. 1960;10:535-9 [PMID: 13838253]
  22. Lancet. 1964 Oct 17;2(7364):825-32 [PMID: 14197156]
  23. Am Heart J. 1960 Nov;60:745-61 [PMID: 13740337]
  24. N Engl J Med. 1968 Jul 4;279(1):12-7 [PMID: 4872564]
  25. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1967 Jul;10(1):1-29 [PMID: 5343156]
  26. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1968 Jul;11(1):1-17 [PMID: 4875352]
  27. Lancet. 1968 Jul 20;2(7560):146-7 [PMID: 4173266]
  28. Circulation. 1969 Nov;40(5):641-52 [PMID: 5377206]
  29. Am Heart J. 1957 Sep;54(3):458-77 [PMID: 13458079]
  30. Am J Med. 1963 Feb;34:147-50 [PMID: 14015090]
  31. Lancet. 1968 May 4;1(7549):944-6 [PMID: 4171583]
  32. Circulation. 1961 Aug;24:267-9 [PMID: 17533672]
  33. Circulation. 1966 May;33(5):753-62 [PMID: 5936693]
  34. J Clin Invest. 1969 Nov;48(11):2008-18 [PMID: 16695956]
  35. Ann Intern Med. 1955 Jul;43(1):100-19 [PMID: 14388543]
  36. Am Heart J. 1970 Mar;79(3):370-83 [PMID: 4312912]
  37. Am J Cardiol. 1967 Oct;20(4):484-93 [PMID: 6052823]
  38. Ann Intern Med. 1967 Jun;66(6):1283-7 [PMID: 6027949]

MeSH Term

Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Angina Pectoris
Blood Pressure
Body Surface Area
Cardiac Output
Diabetes Complications
Humans

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.02LVEDPventricularpatientscardiacstrokeleftfailureshockpressuremmHglowerheartLeftacutemyocardialinfarctionaveragedindexliter/min/mvolumeml/mworkg-m/mclinicalreducedsignificantly1elevated14apparently349normalsigns9group5markedlyatrialRAPusuallyoutputcompensatorytachycardiafunctioncatheterizationcarried40end-diastolic85%studieduncomplicatedinfarcts159838withinlimits1229limit793163721591611largepresystolic"kick"averageamplitudeimportantfactorhighfirstderivativenonshockAlthoughrightcorrelatedr=0widediscrepanciesindividualrenderedunreliableindicatormagnitudefillingTHESEDATASHOWTHEFOLLOWING:evenabsencebsupportedincreasedcimpairedinadequatedilatationcontributeindividualsdmayrepresentdifferencescompliance

Similar Articles

Cited By