Comparison of two established platelet stickiness methods in atherosclerotic patients and normal subjects and a proposed modification.

E Besterman, J B Heywood, J James
Author Information

Abstract

No abstract text available.

References

  1. Lancet. 1965 Nov 13;2(7420):980-2 [PMID: 4159214]
  2. Br Med J. 1967 Mar 11;1(5540):597-600 [PMID: 6023321]
  3. Lancet. 1967 Sep 9;2(7515):542-3 [PMID: 4166896]
  4. Thromb Diath Haemorrh. 1966 Jul 31;16(1):100-4 [PMID: 5989038]
  5. Scand J Haematol. 1967;4(5):385-400 [PMID: 6081353]
  6. J Clin Pathol. 1967 Sep;20(5):710-6 [PMID: 5602981]
  7. Scand J Haematol. 1968;5(6):428-31 [PMID: 5731930]
  8. Acta Med Scand. 1969 Jan-Feb;185(1-2):127-31 [PMID: 5805962]
  9. J Appl Physiol. 1950 Dec;3(6):365-77 [PMID: 14794596]
  10. Lancet. 1959 May 30;1(7083):1115-8 [PMID: 13665976]
  11. J Clin Pathol. 1961 Mar;14:140-9 [PMID: 13730014]

MeSH Term

Acute Disease
Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Arteriosclerosis
Blood Platelets
Chronic Disease
Coronary Disease
Humans
Methods
Middle Aged
Myocardial Infarction
Platelet Adhesiveness

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0Comparisontwoestablishedplateletstickinessmethodsatheroscleroticpatientsnormalsubjectsproposedmodification

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.