Comparison of ribotyping and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA PCR for characterization of Vibrio vulnificus.

L Høi, A Dalsgaard, J L Larsen, J M Warner, J D Oliver
Author Information
  1. L Høi: Department of Veterinary Microbiology, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.

Abstract

A total of 85 isolates of Vibrio vulnificus were characterized by ribotyping with a probe complementary to 16S and 23S rRNA of Escherichia coli and by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA-PCR (RAPD-PCR) with a 10-mer oligonucleotide primer. The RAPD-PCR results were scanned, and the images were analyzed with a computer program. Ribotype membranes were evaluated visually. Both the ribotyping and the RAPD-PCR results showed that the collection of strains was genetically very heterogeneous. Ribotyping enabled us to differentiate U.S. and Danish strains and V. vulnificus biotypes 1 and 2, while the RAPD-PCR technique was not able to correlate isolates with sources or to differentiate the two biotypes, suggesting that ribotyping is useful for typing V. vulnificus strains whereas RAPD-PCR profiles may subdivide ribotypes. Two Danish clinical biotype 2 strains isolated from fishermen who contracted the infection cleaning eels belonged to the same ribotype as three eel strains (biotype 2), providing further evidence that V. vulnificus biotype 2 is an opportunistic pathogen for humans. One isolate (biotype 2) from Danish coastal waters also showed the same ribotype as the eel strains. This is, to our knowledge, the first time the isolation of V. vulnificus biotype 2 from coastal waters has been described.

References

  1. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 Jul;52(1):211-3 [PMID: 3729404]
  2. Med J Aust. 1953 Jul 4;2(1):7-10 [PMID: 13070946]
  3. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Nov 25;18(22):6531-5 [PMID: 1979162]
  4. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Aug;29(8):1684-8 [PMID: 1761690]
  5. Epidemiol Infect. 1992 Jun;108(3):463-7 [PMID: 1601080]
  6. J Infect Dis. 1992 Jul;166(1):209-10 [PMID: 1607700]
  7. Pathology. 1992 Apr;24(2):121-2 [PMID: 1641257]
  8. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992 Oct;58(10):3257-62 [PMID: 1444362]
  9. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992 Sep;58(9):2776-82 [PMID: 1444386]
  10. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Sep;44(3):640-6 [PMID: 7138004]
  11. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983 Mar;45(3):985-98 [PMID: 6847190]
  12. J Infect Dis. 1984 Apr;149(4):558-61 [PMID: 6725989]
  13. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 May;51(5):1004-6 [PMID: 3729387]
  14. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993 Feb;59(2):541-6 [PMID: 8434919]
  15. Infect Immun. 1993 May;61(5):2053-8 [PMID: 8478094]
  16. Epidemiol Infect. 1994 Apr;112(2):285-90 [PMID: 8150002]
  17. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994 Mar;60(3):984-8 [PMID: 8161189]
  18. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1994 Apr;44(2):330-7 [PMID: 8186099]
  19. Comput Appl Biosci. 1994 Sep;10(5):569-70 [PMID: 7828077]
  20. APMIS. 1994 Nov;102(11):874-6 [PMID: 7833008]
  21. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995 Jan;61(1):245-51 [PMID: 7534053]
  22. Ugeskr Laeger. 1995 May 29;157(22):3202-4 [PMID: 7770985]
  23. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995 Mar;61(3):1133-7 [PMID: 7793914]
  24. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995 Mar;61(3):1163-8 [PMID: 7793918]
  25. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Jun;33(6):1534-6 [PMID: 7650181]
  26. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996 Feb;62(2):717-24 [PMID: 8593075]
  27. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996 Mar;15(3):227-32 [PMID: 8740858]
  28. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996 Mar;62(3):918-27 [PMID: 8975619]
  29. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996 Apr;62(4):1454-7 [PMID: 8919812]
  30. Lett Appl Microbiol. 1996 Feb;22(2):184-8 [PMID: 8936379]
  31. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 Sep;53(9):2262-4 [PMID: 3674873]

MeSH Term

Animals
Bacterial Typing Techniques
DNA Probes
Eels
Electronic Data Processing
Escherichia coli
Humans
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S
RNA, Ribosomal, 23S
Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique
Vibrio
Vibrio Infections

Chemicals

DNA Probes
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S
RNA, Ribosomal, 23S

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0vulnificusstrains2RAPD-PCRbiotyperibotypingVDanishisolatesVibriorandomlyamplifiedpolymorphicresultsshoweddifferentiatebiotypesribotypeeelcoastalwaterstotal85characterizedprobecomplementary16S23SrRNAEscherichiacoliDNA-PCR10-meroligonucleotideprimerscannedimagesanalyzedcomputerprogramRibotypemembranesevaluatedvisuallycollectiongeneticallyheterogeneousRibotypingenabledusUS1techniqueablecorrelatesourcestwosuggestingusefultypingwhereasprofilesmaysubdivideribotypesTwoclinicalisolatedfishermencontractedinfectioncleaningeelsbelongedthreeprovidingevidenceopportunisticpathogenhumansOneisolatealsoknowledgefirsttimeisolationdescribedComparisonDNAPCRcharacterization

Similar Articles

Cited By