Which route for hysterectomy? Evidence-based outcomes guide selection.

S R Kovac
Author Information
  1. S R Kovac: Division of pelvic reconstructive surgery and urogynecology, Wright State University School of Medicine, Dayton, Ohio 45409-2794, USA.

Abstract

The controversy continues over the appropriate use of vaginal hysterectomy for many indications that were previously treated only with abdominal or laparoscopic methods. Current outcomes data have pointed up the need for established guidelines to ensure that patients receive appropriate surgical treatment that is most cost-effective and that meets the standard of quality care. Dr Kovac reviews recent data regarding the various surgical options for hysterectomy and offers guidelines based on objective pathologic criteria.

MeSH Term

Evidence-Based Medicine
Female
Humans
Hysterectomy
Hysterectomy, Vaginal
Patient Selection
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Uterine Diseases

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0appropriatehysterectomyoutcomesdataguidelinessurgicalcontroversycontinuesusevaginalmanyindicationspreviouslytreatedabdominallaparoscopicmethodsCurrentpointedneedestablishedensurepatientsreceivetreatmentcost-effectivemeetsstandardqualitycareDrKovacreviewsrecentregardingvariousoptionsoffersbasedobjectivepathologiccriteriaroutehysterectomy?Evidence-basedguideselection

Similar Articles

Cited By