Effects of reinforcement rate and delay on the acquisition of lever pressing by rats.

C A Bruner, R Avila, L Acuña, L M Gallardo
Author Information
  1. C A Bruner: Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, D.F., México.

Abstract

The acquisition of lever pressing by naive rats, in the absence of shaping, was studied as a function of different rates and unsignaled delays of reinforcement. Groups of 3 rats were each exposed to tandem schedules that differed in either the first or the second component. First-component schedules were either continuous reinforcement or random-interval 15, 30, 60 or 120 s; second-component schedules were fixed-time 0, 1, 3, 6, 12, or 24 s. Rate of responding was low under continuous immediate reinforcement and higher under random-interval 15 s. Random interval 30-s and 60-s schedules produced lower rates that were similar to each other. Random-interval 120 s controlled the lowest rate in the immediate-reinforcement condition. Adding a constant 12-s delay to each of the first-component schedule parameters controlled lower response rates that did not vary systematically with reinforcement rate. The continuous and random-interval 60-s schedules of immediate reinforcement controlled higher global and first-component response rates than did the same schedules combined with longer delays, and first-component rates showed some graded effects of delay duration. In addition, the same schedules controlled higher second-component response rates in combination with a 1-s delay than in combination with longer delays. These results were related to those from previous studies on acquisition with delayed reinforcement as well as to those from similar reinforcement procedures used during steady-state responding.

References

  1. J Exp Anal Behav. 1960 Jul;3:221-34 [PMID: 13816335]
  2. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Jan;5(Suppl):113-66 [PMID: 13892922]
  3. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Jan;27(1):119-25 [PMID: 16811969]
  4. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1990 Jan;16(1):27-39 [PMID: 2303791]
  5. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Nov;58(3):431-43 [PMID: 16812674]
  6. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Mar;59(2):373-87 [PMID: 8454959]
  7. J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Nov;26(3):441-9 [PMID: 16811959]
  8. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Jan;61(1):35-44 [PMID: 16812724]
  9. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Sep;30(2):169-75 [PMID: 16812096]
  10. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Mar;59(2):245-64 [PMID: 16812686]
  11. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Mar;35(2):145-52 [PMID: 16812205]
  12. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Oct;6:607-16 [PMID: 14055961]
  13. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 May;7:281-3 [PMID: 14143926]
  14. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 May;11(3):Suppl:327-83 [PMID: 5672248]

MeSH Term

Animals
Behavior, Animal
Conditioning, Operant
Learning
Male
Rats
Rats, Wistar
Reaction Time
Reinforcement, Psychology
Time Factors

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0reinforcementschedulesratesscontrolleddelayacquisitionratsdelayscontinuousrandom-intervalhigherratefirst-componentresponseleverpressing3either15120second-componentrespondingimmediate60-slowersimilarlongercombinationnaiveabsenceshapingstudiedfunctiondifferentunsignaledGroupsexposedtandemdifferedfirstsecondcomponentFirst-component3060fixed-time0161224RatelowRandominterval30-sproducedRandom-intervallowestimmediate-reinforcementconditionAddingconstant12-sscheduleparametersvarysystematicallyglobalcombinedshowedgradedeffectsdurationaddition1-sresultsrelatedpreviousstudiesdelayedwellproceduresusedsteady-stateEffects

Similar Articles

Cited By (2)