Comparing fourth-year medical students with faculty in the teaching of physical examination skills to first-year students.

S A Haist, J F Wilson, N L Brigham, S E Fosson, A V Blue
Author Information
  1. S A Haist: Department of Internal Medicine, K509 Kentucky Clinic, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40536-0284, USA. sahais0@pop.uky.edu

Abstract

PURPOSE: To see whether fourth-year medical students can teach the physical examination to first-year students as effectively as can faculty preceptors.
METHOD: Ninety-three first-year students studying the physical examination were randomly assigned to one of ten fourth-year student preceptors or one of 15 faculty preceptors. Test results and course evaluations were compared by type of preceptor. Fourth-year student preceptors were surveyed regarding their experience.
RESULTS: The mean test scores did not differ between the first-year students with fourth-year student preceptors and those with faculty preceptors. The first-year students rated the fourth-year student preceptors higher than they did the faculty preceptors. The fourth-year students rated their experience favorably.
CONCLUSION: A select group of fourth-year medical students provides a successful alternative to faculty in the teaching of the physical examination to first-year students.

MeSH Term

Attitude
Clinical Competence
Education, Medical
Educational Measurement
Faculty, Medical
Female
Humans
Male
Physical Examination
Program Evaluation
Students, Medical
Teaching

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0studentspreceptorsfourth-yearfirst-yearfacultyphysicalexaminationstudentmedicalcanoneexperienceratedteachingPURPOSE:seewhetherteacheffectivelyMETHOD:Ninety-threestudyingrandomlyassignedten15TestresultscourseevaluationscomparedtypepreceptorFourth-yearsurveyedregardingRESULTS:meantestscoresdifferhigherfavorablyCONCLUSION:selectgroupprovidessuccessfulalternativeComparingskills

Similar Articles

Cited By (15)