An epimerase gene essential for capsule synthesis in Vibrio vulnificus.

A B Zuppardo, R J Siebeling
Author Information
  1. A B Zuppardo: Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA. azuppar@tiger.lsu.edu

Abstract

The extracellular capsule polysaccharide (CPS) of Vibrio vulnificus is a primary virulence factor which allows survival of the bacteria in the human host. To study the genes involved in expression of the capsule, we generated mutants that lost the ability to produce CPS following the insertion of a minitransposon into the genome of an encapsulated, clinical strain of V. vulnificus. A genomic region, from one nonencapsulated mutant, containing the transposon and flanking V. vulnificus DNA was cloned, and a probe complementary to the chromosomal DNA immediately adjacent to the transposon was used to locate this fragment in the genome of the encapsulated parent strain. The fragment, which contained a putative capsule gene, was cloned and, when supplied in trans, complemented the mutation in the nonencapsulated mutant to restore capsule production. In addition, virulence studies, using the 50% lethal dose assay, showed that the restoration of capsule production also restored the virulence of the organism. Sequence analysis of the gene disrupted by the transposon revealed that it matched a nucleotide-sugar epimerase of Vibrio cholerae O139, with 75 and 85% identities at the nucleotide and amino acid levels, respectively. In addition, computer analysis recognized epimerases of various organisms as highly similar to the putative epimerase of V. vulnificus. Finally, a combination of PCR amplification and Southern blotting showed that this epimerase is common to at least 10 strains of V. vulnificus that each express a serologically distinct CPS. Our results indicate that the epimerase gene is essential for capsule expression in V. vulnificus.

Associated Data

GENBANK | AF059755

References

  1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Apr;76(4):1648-52 [PMID: 377280]
  2. Mol Microbiol. 1993 Mar;7(5):725-34 [PMID: 7682279]
  3. Can J Microbiol. 1992 Jul;38(7):699-704 [PMID: 1382824]
  4. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1986 Jul;5(2):99-111 [PMID: 3522090]
  5. Biotechniques. 1994 May;16(5):800-2 [PMID: 8068328]
  6. Arch Intern Med. 1991 Aug;151(8):1606-9 [PMID: 1872665]
  7. JAMA. 1983 Apr 1;249(13):1756-7 [PMID: 6572281]
  8. Infect Immun. 1987 Jan;55(1):269-72 [PMID: 2432016]
  9. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992 Sep;58(9):2776-82 [PMID: 1444386]
  10. J Bacteriol. 1993 Jul;175(14):4456-65 [PMID: 8331073]
  11. FASEB J. 1996 Mar;10(4):461-70 [PMID: 8647345]
  12. Infect Immun. 1994 Feb;62(2):759-63 [PMID: 8300241]
  13. Infect Immun. 1990 Jun;58(6):1769-73 [PMID: 2160432]
  14. J Bacteriol. 1989 Mar;171(3):1763-6 [PMID: 2537827]
  15. J Bacteriol. 1997 Apr;179(8):2740-7 [PMID: 9098074]
  16. Epidemiol Infect. 1992 Jun;108(3):463-7 [PMID: 1601080]
  17. J Mol Biol. 1986 Jan 5;187(1):101-7 [PMID: 3959077]
  18. N Engl J Med. 1979 Jan 4;300(1):1-5 [PMID: 758155]
  19. J Bacteriol. 1996 May;178(9):2527-32 [PMID: 8626318]
  20. Biochemistry. 1996 Apr 23;35(16):5137-44 [PMID: 8611497]
  21. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Mar;86(5):1669-73 [PMID: 2493648]
  22. J Bacteriol. 1986 Dec;168(3):1228-33 [PMID: 3023300]
  23. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1990;150:65-85 [PMID: 2404690]
  24. J Infect Dis. 1993 Sep;168(3):758-62 [PMID: 8354917]
  25. J Bacteriol. 1989 Jun;171(6):3343-7 [PMID: 2785986]
  26. J Bacteriol. 1990 Nov;172(11):6568-72 [PMID: 2172217]
  27. EMBO J. 1995 Jan 16;14(2):209-16 [PMID: 7835331]
  28. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994 Feb;17(1):63-70 [PMID: 8004935]
  29. Infect Immun. 1993 May;61(5):2053-8 [PMID: 8478094]
  30. J Mol Biol. 1981 Apr 5;147(2):217-26 [PMID: 6270337]
  31. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1992 Dec 15;100(1-3):121-4 [PMID: 1478450]
  32. Biotechniques. 1995 Mar;18(3):418-22 [PMID: 7779390]
  33. Can J Microbiol. 1988 Apr;34(4):415-20 [PMID: 3052752]
  34. Mol Microbiol. 1996 Feb;19(4):815-26 [PMID: 8820651]
  35. Infect Immun. 1984 Sep;45(3):537-43 [PMID: 6469346]
  36. J Bacteriol. 1988 Jun;170(6):2575-83 [PMID: 2836362]
  37. Ann Intern Med. 1983 Oct;99(4):464-9 [PMID: 6625378]
  38. J Bacteriol. 1995 Apr;177(7):1788-96 [PMID: 7896702]
  39. J Bacteriol. 1994 Nov;176(22):7005-16 [PMID: 7961465]
  40. Infect Immun. 1981 Nov;34(2):503-7 [PMID: 7309236]
  41. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1996;50:285-315 [PMID: 8905082]
  42. Methods Enzymol. 1991;204:139-80 [PMID: 1658561]
  43. Comput Appl Biosci. 1994 Dec;10(6):661-9 [PMID: 7704665]
  44. J Surg Res. 1987 Dec;43(6):527-31 [PMID: 3695454]
  45. Gene. 1986;49(2):253-62 [PMID: 2952553]
  46. J Bacteriol. 1982 Sep;151(3):1210-21 [PMID: 6179923]
  47. Infect Immun. 1985 Feb;47(2):446-51 [PMID: 2578434]
  48. Mol Microbiol. 1996 May;20(4):799-811 [PMID: 8793876]
  49. J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5;215(3):403-10 [PMID: 2231712]
  50. J Gen Microbiol. 1993 Aug;139(8):1707-14 [PMID: 8409913]

MeSH Term

Amino Acid Sequence
Animals
Bacterial Capsules
Binding Sites
Carbohydrate Epimerases
Cloning, Molecular
Genes, Bacterial
Genetic Complementation Test
Male
Mice
Molecular Sequence Data
Mutagenesis, Insertional
NAD
Open Reading Frames
Sequence Analysis, DNA
Sequence Homology, Amino Acid
Serotyping
Vibrio

Chemicals

NAD
Carbohydrate Epimerases

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0capsulevulnificusVepimerasegeneCPSVibriovirulencetransposonexpressiongenomeencapsulatedstrainnonencapsulatedmutantDNAclonedfragmentputativeproductionadditionshowedanalysisessentialextracellularpolysaccharideprimaryfactorallowssurvivalbacteriahumanhoststudygenesinvolvedgeneratedmutantslostabilityproducefollowinginsertionminitransposonclinicalgenomicregiononecontainingflankingprobecomplementarychromosomalimmediatelyadjacentusedlocateparentcontainedsuppliedtranscomplementedmutationrestorestudiesusing50%lethaldoseassayrestorationalsorestoredorganismSequencedisruptedrevealedmatchednucleotide-sugarcholeraeO1397585%identitiesnucleotideaminoacidlevelsrespectivelycomputerrecognizedepimerasesvariousorganismshighlysimilarFinallycombinationPCRamplificationSouthernblottingcommonleast10strainsexpressserologicallydistinctresultsindicatesynthesis

Similar Articles

Cited By