Prevention services in primary care: taking time, setting priorities.

M Rafferty
Author Information
  1. M Rafferty: Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA. mraffert@fpm.eushc.org

Abstract

Preventive services are delivered at rates far below recommended levels. Although lack of time has frequently been cited as an important factor, little is known about how much time primary care clinicians devote to prevention and how they prioritize that time. Work sampling was used to estimate the proportion of time spent on prevention during routine care of patients by primary care clinicians in two hospital-based clinics serving indigent patients. Clinicians were prompted by computer at random intervals to describe their current activity and, if the activity was prevention-related, to choose the specific activity from a list modified from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendations. Proportions of time spent on prevention overall and by specific prevention activity were calculated, and the association between USPSTF ratings of specific prevention activities and proportion of time spent on those activities was examined using Kendall's Tau. Clinicians in these clinics spent just 11% of their time on prevention, or about 7 minutes per patient per year. Screening for just two diseases, breast cancer and cervical cancer, accounted for half of all prevention-related activity. There was no overall relation found between proportion of time by specific prevention activity and USPSTF ratings. Thus, the primary care clinicians spent little time on prevention and did not apportion that time according to USPSTF recommendations. If these results are representative, time constraints in actual practice may be too severe to deliver the full range of preventive services suggested by USPSTF.

References

  1. Health Serv Res. 1993 Dec;28(5):577-97 [PMID: 8270422]
  2. J Fam Pract. 1993 Oct;37(4):356-60 [PMID: 8409889]
  3. J Fam Pract. 1994 Mar;38(3):231-7 [PMID: 8126402]
  4. J Fam Pract. 1994 Aug;39(2):140-7 [PMID: 8057064]
  5. Vital Health Stat 13. 1994 May;(116):1-110 [PMID: 7520648]
  6. Arch Intern Med. 1995 Feb 27;155(4):421-4 [PMID: 7848026]
  7. Arch Fam Med. 1995 Apr;4(4):311-5 [PMID: 7536091]
  8. Am J Public Health. 1995 Jun;85(6):795-800 [PMID: 7762712]
  9. J Gen Intern Med. 1995 Mar;10(3):138-44 [PMID: 7769470]
  10. J Fam Pract. 1995 Jun;40(6):547-54 [PMID: 7775908]
  11. Ann Intern Med. 1996 May 15;124(10):897-905 [PMID: 8610920]
  12. Arch Intern Med. 1996 Jul 8;156(13):1399-411 [PMID: 8678708]
  13. Prev Med. 1984 Sep;13(5):535-48 [PMID: 6527994]
  14. J Gen Intern Med. 1986 Sep-Oct;1(5):275-81 [PMID: 3772615]
  15. J Gen Intern Med. 1990 Jul-Aug;5(4):327-34 [PMID: 2374043]
  16. Ann Intern Med. 1991 Jan 1;114(1):54-8 [PMID: 1983933]
  17. Arch Intern Med. 1991 Jan;151(1):50-6 [PMID: 1985609]
  18. J Fam Pract. 1991 May;32(5):465-71 [PMID: 2022934]
  19. J Fam Pract. 1992 Apr;34(4):409-16 [PMID: 1556535]
  20. J Cancer Educ. 1992;7(1):55-60 [PMID: 1571246]
  21. Health Educ Q. 1992 Summer;19(2):157-75 [PMID: 1618625]
  22. Am J Prev Med. 1992 May-Jun;8(3):150-3 [PMID: 1633001]
  23. CA Cancer J Clin. 1993 Jan-Feb;43(1):42-6 [PMID: 8422604]
  24. Am J Prev Med. 1993 Mar-Apr;9(2):71-7 [PMID: 8471273]
  25. Ann Intern Med. 1993 Jul 15;119(2):129-35 [PMID: 8512162]
  26. Am J Public Health. 1993 Jul;83(7):979-82 [PMID: 8328620]
  27. Mayo Clin Proc. 1993 Aug;68(8):785-91 [PMID: 8331981]
  28. J Fam Pract. 1993 Jul;37(1):35-43 [PMID: 8345338]
  29. JAMA. 1994 Feb 16;271(7):525-30 [PMID: 8301767]

MeSH Term

Adult
Aged
Breast Neoplasms
Chemoprevention
Counseling
Female
Health Priorities
Hospitals, Urban
Humans
Immunization
Male
Mass Screening
Medical Indigency
Middle Aged
Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
Outpatient Clinics, Hospital
Preventive Health Services
Primary Health Care
Smoking Prevention
Time Factors
User-Computer Interface
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0timepreventionactivityspentUSPSTFprimarycarespecificservicescliniciansproportionPreventivelittlepatientstwoclinicsCliniciansprevention-relatedrecommendationsoverallratingsactivitiesjustpercancerdeliveredratesfarrecommendedlevelsAlthoughlackfrequentlycitedimportantfactorknownmuchdevoteprioritizeWorksamplingusedestimateroutinehospital-basedservingindigentpromptedcomputerrandomintervalsdescribecurrentchooselistmodifiedUSServicesTaskForceProportionscalculatedassociationexaminedusingKendall'sTau11%7minutespatientyearScreeningdiseasesbreastcervicalaccountedhalfrelationfoundThusapportionaccordingresultsrepresentativeconstraintsactualpracticemayseveredeliverfullrangepreventivesuggestedPreventioncare:takingsettingpriorities

Similar Articles

Cited By (8)