Evaluation of patients' knowledge about anticoagulant treatment.

F C Taylor, M E Ramsay, G Tan, J Gabbay, H Cohen
Author Information
  1. F C Taylor: St Mary's Hospital Medical School, London.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a questionnaire to evaluate patients' knowledge of anticoagulation.
DESIGN: Anonymous self completed questionnaire study based on hospital anticoagulant guidelines.
SETTING: Anticoagulant clinic in a 580 bed district general hospital in London.
SUBJECTS: 70 consecutive patients newly referred to the anticoagulant clinic over six months.
MAIN MEASURES: Information received by patients on six items of anticoagulation counselling (mode of action of warfarin, adverse effects of over or under anticoagulation, drugs to avoid, action if bleeding or bruising occurs, and alcohol consumption), the source of such information, and patients' knowledge about anticoagulation.
RESULTS: Of the recruits, 36 (51%) were male; 38(54%) were aged below 46 years, 22(31%) 46-60, and 10(14%) over 75. 50 (71%) questionnaires were returned. In all, 40 respondents spoke English at home and six another language. Most patients reported being clearly advised on five of the six items, but knowledge about anticoagulation was poor. Few patients could correctly identify adverse conditions associated with poor control of anticoagulation: bleeding was identified by only 30(60%), bruising by 23(56%), and thrombosis by 18(36%). Only 26(52%) patients could identify an excessive level of alcohol consumption, and only seven (14%) could identify three or more self prescribed agents which may interfere with warfarin.
CONCLUSION: The questionnaire provided a simple method of determining patients' knowledge of anticoagulation, and its results indicated that this requires improvement.
IMPLICATIONS: patients' responses suggested that advice was not always given by medical staff, and use of counselling checklists is recommended. Reinforcement of advice by non-medical counsellors and with educational guides such as posters or leaflets should be considered. Such initiatives are currently being evaluated in a repeat survey.

References

  1. Psychol Med. 1973 May;3(2):217-20 [PMID: 4715854]
  2. Qual Health Care. 1993 Jun;2(2):96-9 [PMID: 10131640]
  3. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982 Mar 6;284(6317):702-4 [PMID: 6802293]
  4. Postgrad Med. 1987 Mar;81(4):273-8 [PMID: 3822963]
  5. Clin Lab Haematol. 1988;10(1):109-12 [PMID: 3365930]
  6. J Gen Intern Med. 1988 Sep-Oct;3(5):448-57 [PMID: 3049968]
  7. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1988 Oct;22(4):248-51 [PMID: 3230542]
  8. J R Soc Med. 1990 May;83(5):298-300 [PMID: 2380944]
  9. J R Soc Med. 1990 May;83(5):300-2 [PMID: 2380945]
  10. BMJ. 1990 Sep 15;301(6751):526-9 [PMID: 2207423]
  11. J Adv Nurs. 1990 Sep;15(9):1052-63 [PMID: 2229704]
  12. J Adv Nurs. 1991 Jul;16(7):837-44 [PMID: 1918648]
  13. Soc Sci Med. 1992 Jun;34(12):1345-50 [PMID: 1529372]
  14. J Clin Pathol. 1993 Jan;46(1):67-71 [PMID: 8432893]
  15. BMJ. 1993 May 15;306(6888):1322-7 [PMID: 8518575]

MeSH Term

Aged
Anticoagulants
Contraindications
Counseling
Educational Measurement
Female
Forms and Records Control
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Hospital Bed Capacity, 500 and over
Hospitals, General
Humans
London
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Education as Topic
Professional-Patient Relations
Surveys and Questionnaires

Chemicals

Anticoagulants

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0anticoagulationknowledgepatientspatients'sixquestionnaireanticoagulantidentifyselfhospitalclinicitemscounsellingactionwarfarinadversebleedingbruisingalcoholconsumption14%pooradviceOBJECTIVE:developevaluateDESIGN:AnonymouscompletedstudybasedguidelinesSETTING:Anticoagulant580beddistrictgeneralLondonSUBJECTS:70consecutivenewlyreferredmonthsMAINMEASURES:InformationreceivedmodeeffectsdrugsavoidoccurssourceinformationRESULTS:recruits3651%male3854%aged46years2231%46-6010755071%questionnairesreturned40respondentsspokeEnglishhomeanotherlanguagereportedclearlyadvisedfivecorrectlyconditionsassociatedcontrolanticoagulation:identified3060%2356%thrombosis1836%2652%excessivelevelseventhreeprescribedagentsmayinterfereCONCLUSION:providedsimplemethoddeterminingresultsindicatedrequiresimprovementIMPLICATIONS:Patients'responsessuggestedalwaysgivenmedicalstaffusechecklistsrecommendedReinforcementnon-medicalcounsellorseducationalguidespostersleafletsconsideredinitiativescurrentlyevaluatedrepeatsurveyEvaluationtreatment

Similar Articles

Cited By (11)