Willingness to pay for diagnostic certainty: comparing patients, physicians, and managed care executives.

R A Hirth, B S Bloom, M E Chernew, A M Fendrick
Author Information
  1. R A Hirth: Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich. 48109-2029, USA.

Abstract

Cost-effectiveness analyses routinely ignore the value of diagnostic certainty. Moreover, no previous study has compared this value among different stakeholders. We surveyed 25 patients, 28 physicians, and 23 managed care executives to compare their willingness to pay for diagnostic information for peptic ulcer disease. Patients (84%) were most likely, and executives (43%) least likely, to be willing to pay at least $1 (median willingness to pay < $50). Differences in willingness to pay among stakeholders indicate potential for conflicts over access to tests. Although nearly all patients valued diagnostic certainty, its value was generally small and insufficient to change the cost-effectiveness ranking of treatment alternatives.

MeSH Term

Administrative Personnel
Attitude of Health Personnel
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Decision Making
Female
Humans
Male
Managed Care Programs
Middle Aged
Patient Satisfaction
Peptic Ulcer
Physicians
Quality of Health Care
Rural Population
United States

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0paydiagnosticvaluepatientsexecutiveswillingnesscertaintyamongstakeholdersphysiciansmanagedcarelikelyleastCost-effectivenessanalysesroutinelyignoreMoreoverpreviousstudycompareddifferentsurveyed252823compareinformationpepticulcerdiseasePatients84%43%willing$1median<$50DifferencesindicatepotentialconflictsaccesstestsAlthoughnearlyvaluedgenerallysmallinsufficientchangecost-effectivenessrankingtreatmentalternativesWillingnesscertainty:comparing

Similar Articles

Cited By