Epidemiology of blood collection in France.

S Lawson-Ayayi, L R Salmi
Author Information
  1. S Lawson-Ayayi: Centre national d'hémovigilance, Institut de santé publique, d'épidémiologie et de développement, Bordeaux, France. Sylvie.Lawson-Ayayi@dim.u-bordeaux2.fr

Abstract

The objectives of the cross-sectional study (EpiCoS) were to describe, at different stages, volunteers offering their blood, and to characterize various ways of collecting blood. From 15 September 1996 to 31 December 1996, individuals presenting at fixed or mobile sessions in one of 11 randomly selected blood banks were included after they had a medical examination. Variables studied were relative to type of collection, individuals, medical examination, patterns of blood letting, use of collected donations and if unused, reasons for discarding. Sixty four thousand and ninety two volunteers, aged 17-66 years old were included. The proportion of exclusion during medical examination was 10.8% (95% confidence interval (CI): 10.6-11.0%). Exclusions were more frequent among new volunteers and were mostly related to the safety of recipients. Most of the 57,003 donations were whole blood (94.0%) and collected in mobile sessions (89.9%). Five percent of collected donations were discarded; 3.5% (95% CI: 3.4-3.7%) of donations discarded for biological abnormalities, including 1.5% only for initial screen reactions to infectious disease markers (HBs antigen, anti-HBc antibodies, anti-HCV antibodies, anti-HIV antibodies, anti-HTLV antibodies, malaria antibodies and anti-syphilitic antibodies). The most frequent biological abnormality was a high alanine aminotransferase level. A follow-up of these indicators, within the French haemovigilance system, should allow further identification of risk factors and high-risk contexts, and planning means of optimizing blood collection in France.

References

  1. Transfus Med Rev. 1996 Oct;10(4):286-95 [PMID: 8899957]
  2. Vox Sang. 1994;67 Suppl 5:20-7 [PMID: 7701821]
  3. CMAJ. 1995 Feb 15;152(4):521-4 [PMID: 7859200]
  4. Transfus Med. 1995 Sep;5(3):209-12 [PMID: 8593526]
  5. Vox Sang. 1994;67 Suppl 3:137-8 [PMID: 7975478]
  6. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1993 May;22(3):326-31 [PMID: 8373113]
  7. Transfus Clin Biol. 1994;1(3):252-6 [PMID: 8044324]
  8. Vox Sang. 1994;67 Suppl 5:37-42 [PMID: 7701824]
  9. Vox Sang. 1994;67 Suppl 5:14-9 [PMID: 7701820]
  10. Transfusion. 1980 Sep-Oct;20(5):511-8 [PMID: 7423590]
  11. Transfusion. 1991 Oct;31(8):693-7 [PMID: 1926311]
  12. JAMA. 1995 Nov 1;274(17):1368-73 [PMID: 7563562]
  13. Transfusion. 1995 Nov-Dec;35(11):944-51 [PMID: 8604493]
  14. Transfus Clin Biol. 1994;1(1):51-3 [PMID: 7910508]
  15. Vox Sang. 1994;67 Suppl 3:77-9 [PMID: 7975516]
  16. Vox Sang. 1993;65(1):1-9 [PMID: 8362510]
  17. Vox Sang. 1994;67 Suppl 5:8-13 [PMID: 7701831]
  18. Transfus Med. 1996 Mar;6(1):1-10 [PMID: 8696442]
  19. Transfus Med. 1996 Mar;6(1):37-43 [PMID: 8696446]
  20. Transfus Clin Biol. 1997 Jul;4(4):403-15 [PMID: 9333419]

MeSH Term

Adult
Blood Donors
Communicable Disease Control
Community Participation
Consumer Product Safety
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
France
Humans
Male
Patient Selection
Risk Management
Statistics as Topic

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0bloodantibodiesdonationsvolunteersmedicalexaminationcollectioncollected1996individualsmobilesessionsincluded1095%0%frequentdiscarded35%biologicalFranceobjectivescross-sectionalstudyEpiCoSdescribedifferentstagesofferingcharacterizevariouswayscollecting15September31Decemberpresentingfixedone11randomlyselectedbanksVariablesstudiedrelativetypepatternslettinguseunusedreasonsdiscardingSixtyfourthousandninetytwoaged17-66yearsoldproportionexclusion8%confidenceintervalCI:6-11Exclusionsamongnewmostlyrelatedsafetyrecipients57003whole94899%FivepercentCI:4-37%abnormalitiesincluding1initialscreenreactionsinfectiousdiseasemarkersHBsantigenanti-HBcanti-HCVanti-HIVanti-HTLVmalariaanti-syphiliticabnormalityhighalanineaminotransferaselevelfollow-upindicatorswithinFrenchhaemovigilancesystemallowidentificationriskfactorshigh-riskcontextsplanningmeansoptimizingEpidemiology

Similar Articles

Cited By