Fatigue among working people: validity of a questionnaire measure.

A J Beurskens, U Bültmann, I Kant, J H Vercoulen, G Bleijenberg, G M Swaen
Author Information
  1. A J Beurskens: Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the validity of the checklist individual strength questionnaire (CIS) in the working population. This 20 item self reported questionnaire has often been used in patients with chronic fatigue. To date, no research has focused on the validity of the CIS in occupational groups.
METHODS: To evaluate the discriminant validity the CIS was filled out by five groups of employees with expected differences in fatigue. The convergent validity was evaluated by comparing the results of the CIS with the results of three related measures: measured unidimensional fatigue, burnout, and need for recovery.
RESULTS: The CIS was able to discriminate between fatigued and non-fatigued employees in occupational groups. The expected agreement between the results of the CIS and related measures was confirmed.
CONCLUSIONS: The CIS seems to be an appropriate instrument for measuring fatigue in the working population.

References

  1. J Chronic Dis. 1985;38(1):27-36 [PMID: 3972947]
  2. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1992 Apr;46(2):92-7 [PMID: 1583440]
  3. J Psychosom Res. 1994 Jul;38(5):383-92 [PMID: 7965927]
  4. Arch Neurol. 1996 Jul;53(7):642-9 [PMID: 8929171]
  5. Lancet. 1996 Mar 30;347(9005):858-61 [PMID: 8622391]
  6. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1996 May;60(5):489-94 [PMID: 8778251]
  7. J Psychosom Res. 1995 Apr;39(3):315-25 [PMID: 7636775]

MeSH Term

Adult
Burnout, Professional
Cohort Studies
Employment
Fatigue
Female
Humans
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Netherlands
Prospective Studies
Reproducibility of Results
Surveys and Questionnaires

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0CISvalidityfatiguequestionnaireworkinggroupsresultsevaluatepopulationoccupationalemployeesexpectedrelatedOBJECTIVES:checklistindividualstrength20itemselfreportedoftenusedpatientschronicdateresearchfocusedMETHODS:discriminantfilledfivedifferencesconvergentevaluatedcomparingthreemeasures:measuredunidimensionalburnoutneedrecoveryRESULTS:ablediscriminatefatiguednon-fatiguedagreementmeasuresconfirmedCONCLUSIONS:seemsappropriateinstrumentmeasuringFatigueamongpeople:measure

Similar Articles

Cited By