Improving group practice performance with benchmarking.

M J Witt
Author Information
  1. M J Witt: Camden Group, El Segundo, California, USA. mwitt@thecamdengroup.com

Abstract

Group practices can use benchmarking to improve physician productivity to best-practice levels. The benchmarking process can be broken down into two phases. In the first phase, the problem is identified. This phase involves identifying critical drivers, choosing an external benchmark, gathering internal data, identifying variances, and establishing targets. In the second phase, action is taken. This phase involves identifying actions to take, defining responsibilities, implementing the changes, and monitoring performance. Group practices that use benchmarking need to understand the tool's limitations. Benchmarks serve as roadmaps, but any action plan should be tailored to the practice and take a variety of factors into consideration.

MeSH Term

Benchmarking
Costs and Cost Analysis
Efficiency, Organizational
Group Practice
Humans
Income
Office Visits
Oregon
Physicians
Process Assessment, Health Care
Workload

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0benchmarkingphaseidentifyingGrouppracticescanuseinvolvesactiontakeperformancepracticeimprovephysicianproductivitybest-practicelevelsprocessbrokentwophasesfirstproblemidentifiedcriticaldriverschoosingexternalbenchmarkgatheringinternaldatavariancesestablishingtargetssecondtakenactionsdefiningresponsibilitiesimplementingchangesmonitoringneedunderstandtool'slimitationsBenchmarksserveroadmapsplantailoredvarietyfactorsconsiderationImprovinggroup

Similar Articles

Cited By