Resistance to change of operant variation and repetition.

A H Doughty, K A Lattal
Author Information
  1. A H Doughty: Department of Psychology, West Virginia University, Morgantown 26506-6040, USA. adoughty@wvu.edu

Abstract

A multiple chained schedule was used to compare the relative resistance to change of variable and fixed four-peck response sequences in pigeons. In one terminal link, a response sequence produced food only if it occurred infrequently relative to 15 other response sequences (vary). In the other terminal link, a single response sequence produced food (repeat). Identical variable-interval schedules operated in the initial links. During baseline, lower response rates generally occurred in the vary initial link, and similar response and reinforcement rates occurred in each terminal link. Resistance of responding to prefeeding and three rates of response-independent food delivered during the intercomponent intervals then was compared between components. During each disruption condition, initial- and terminal-link response rates generally were more resistant in the vary component than in the repeat component. During the response-independent food conditions, terminal-link response rates were more resistant than initial-link response rates in each component, but this did not occur during prefeeding. Variation (in vary) and repetition (in repeat) both decreased during the response-independent food conditions in the respective components, but with relatively greater disruption in repeat. These results extend earlier findings demonstrating that operant variation is more resistant to disruption than is operant repetition and suggest that theories of response strength, such as behavioral momentum theory, must consider factors other than reinforcement rate. The implications of the results for understanding operant response classes are discussed.

References

  1. J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 Mar;33(2):153-66 [PMID: 16812164]
  2. J Exp Psychol. 1951 Oct;42(4):273-81 [PMID: 14888834]
  3. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2001 Jan;27(1):79-94 [PMID: 11199517]
  4. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 May;57(3):301-16 [PMID: 1602269]
  5. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Jul;46(1):79-92 [PMID: 16812455]
  6. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 May;21(3):389-408 [PMID: 16811752]
  7. J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Jul;54(1):1-12 [PMID: 2398323]
  8. J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 Jan;69(1):29-47 [PMID: 9465412]
  9. J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 May;53(3):359-79 [PMID: 2341820]
  10. J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 Jul;76(1):43-74 [PMID: 11516115]
  11. Behav Brain Sci. 2000 Feb;23(1):73-90; discussion 90-130 [PMID: 11303339]
  12. Psychol Rev. 1949 Nov;56(6):311-24 [PMID: 15392590]
  13. J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Jan;39(1):49-59 [PMID: 16812312]
  14. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Jul;20(1):1-6 [PMID: 16811685]
  15. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Oct;4:317-21 [PMID: 14469791]
  16. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 May;11(3):259-61 [PMID: 5660706]
  17. J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 Mar;69(2):103-22 [PMID: 9540229]
  18. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Mar;37(2):171-81 [PMID: 16812263]
  19. J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Jul;26(1):113-30 [PMID: 16811925]
  20. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 May;61(3):529-50 [PMID: 16812734]
  21. J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 Jul;68(1):1-25 [PMID: 9241860]
  22. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1990;102(1):49-55 [PMID: 2392507]
  23. J Exp Anal Behav. 1999 Jul;72(1):81-96 [PMID: 16812911]
  24. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Sep;11(5):503-16 [PMID: 5722410]
  25. J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 May;69(3):247-61 [PMID: 16812876]
  26. J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 May;47(3):273-7 [PMID: 16812481]
  27. J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 Sep;70(2):165-83 [PMID: 16812885]

MeSH Term

Animals
Behavior, Animal
Columbidae
Conditioning, Operant
Male
Periodicity
Reinforcement, Psychology

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0responseratesfoodlinkvaryrepeatoperantterminaloccurredresponse-independentdisruptionresistantcomponentrepetitionrelativechangesequencessequenceproducedinitialgenerallyreinforcementResistanceprefeedingcomponentsterminal-linkconditionsresultsvariationmultiplechainedscheduleusedcompareresistancevariablefixedfour-peckpigeonsoneinfrequently15singleIdenticalvariable-intervalschedulesoperatedlinksbaselinelowersimilarrespondingthreedeliveredintercomponentintervalscomparedconditioninitial-initial-linkoccurVariationdecreasedrespectiverelativelygreaterextendearlierfindingsdemonstratingsuggesttheoriesstrengthbehavioralmomentumtheorymustconsiderfactorsrateimplicationsunderstandingclassesdiscussed

Similar Articles

Cited By