The influence of nitrate on microbial processes in oil industry production waters.

I Davidova, M S Hicks, P M Fedorak, J M Suflita
Author Information
  1. I Davidova: Department of Botany and Microbiology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019-6131, USA.

Abstract

Sulfide accumulation due to bacterial sulfate reduction is responsible for a number of serious problems in the oil industry. Among the strategies to control the activity of sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) is the use of nitrate, which can exhibit a variety of effects. We investigated the relevance of this approach to souring oil fields in Oklahoma and Alberta in which water flooding is used to enhance oil recovery. SRB and nitrate-reducing bacteria (NRB) were enumerated in produced waters from both oil fields. In the Oklahoma field, the rates of sulfate reduction ranged from 0.05 to 0.16 microM S day(-1) at the wellheads, and an order of magnitude higher at the oil-water separator. Sulfide production was greatest in the water storage tanks in the Alberta field. Microbial counts alone did not accurately reflect the potential for microbial activities. The majority of the sulfide production appeared to occur after the oil was pumped aboveground, rather than in the reservoir. Laboratory experiments showed that adding 5 and 10 mM nitrate to produced waters from the Oklahoma and Alberta oil fields, respectively, decreased the sulfide content to negligible levels and increased the numbers of NRB. This work suggests that sulfate reduction control measures can be concentrated on aboveground facilities, which will decrease the amount of sulfide reinjected into reservoirs during the disposal of oil field production waters.

MeSH Term

Alberta
Industrial Waste
Nitrates
Nitrites
Oklahoma
Oxidation-Reduction
Petroleum
Sulfates
Sulfides
Waste Disposal, Fluid
Water Microbiology

Chemicals

Industrial Waste
Nitrates
Nitrites
Petroleum
Sulfates
Sulfides

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0oilwatersproductionsulfatereductionnitratefieldsOklahomaAlbertafieldsulfideSulfideindustrycontrolbacteriaSRBcanwaterNRBproduced0microbialabovegroundaccumulationduebacterialresponsiblenumberseriousproblemsAmongstrategiesactivitysulfate-reducinguseexhibitvarietyeffectsinvestigatedrelevanceapproachsouringfloodingusedenhancerecoverynitrate-reducingenumeratedratesranged0516microMSday-1wellheadsordermagnitudehigheroil-waterseparatorgreateststoragetanksMicrobialcountsaloneaccuratelyreflectpotentialactivitiesmajorityappearedoccurpumpedratherreservoirLaboratoryexperimentsshowedadding510mMrespectivelydecreasedcontentnegligiblelevelsincreasednumbersworksuggestsmeasuresconcentratedfacilitieswilldecreaseamountreinjectedreservoirsdisposalinfluenceprocesses

Similar Articles

Cited By