Determinants of reinforcer accumulation during an operant task.

J M McFarland, K A Lattal
Author Information
  1. J M McFarland: Department of Pssychology, West Virginia University, Morgantown 26506-6040, USA. mcfarlan@marshall.edu

Abstract

Responses by rats on an earn lever made available food pellets that were delivered to a food cup by responses on a second, collect, lever. The rats could either collect and immediately consume or accumulate (defined as the percentage of multiple earn responses and as the number of pellets earned before a collect response) earned pellets. In Experiment 1, accumulation varied as a function of variations in the earn or collect response requirements and whether the earn and collect levers were proximal (31 cm) or distal (248 cm) to one another. Some accumulation occurred under all but one of the conditions, but generally was higher when the earn and collect levers were distal to one another, particularly when the earn response requirement was fixed-ratio (FR) 1. In Experiment 2, the contributions of responses and time to accumulation were assessed by comparing an FR 20 earn response requirement to a condition in which only a single earn response was required at the end of a time interval nominally yoked to the FR interval. When 248 cm separated the earn and collect levers, accumulation was always greater in the FR condition, and it was not systematically related to reinforcement rate. In Experiment 3, increasing the earn response requirement with a progressive-ratio schedule that reset only with a collect response increased the likelihood of accumulation when the collect and earn levers were 248 cm apart, even though such accumulation increased the next earn response requirement. Reinforcer accumulation is an understudied dimension of operant behavior that relates to the analysis of such phenomena as hoarding and self-control, in that they too involve accumulating versus immediately collecting or consuming reinforcers.

References

  1. J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Jul;66(1):29-49 [PMID: 8755699]
  2. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Jul;5:339-40 [PMID: 13872796]
  3. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1990 Jan;16(1):27-39 [PMID: 2303791]
  4. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 May;27(3):453-67 [PMID: 16812006]
  5. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jul;22(1):231-42 [PMID: 16811782]
  6. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):215-20 [PMID: 16811439]
  7. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jul;38(1):35-49 [PMID: 16812283]
  8. J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 Mar;69(2):103-22 [PMID: 9540229]
  9. J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Mar;53(2):247-61 [PMID: 2324665]
  10. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Jan;15(1):123-7 [PMID: 16811484]
  11. J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 Nov;68(3):375-98 [PMID: 9375387]
  12. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Jan;17(1):15-22 [PMID: 16811561]
  13. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Nov;50(3):375-94 [PMID: 3209955]
  14. J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 Jan;67(1):131-43 [PMID: 9037784]
  15. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 Mar;9(2):131-4 [PMID: 5907824]
  16. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Jan;49(1):37-47 [PMID: 3346621]

MeSH Term

Animals
Behavior, Animal
Conditioning, Operant
Female
Rats
Reinforcement, Psychology

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0earncollectresponseaccumulationleverscmrequirementFRpelletsresponsesExperiment248oneratsleverfoodimmediatelyearned1distalanothertimeconditionintervalincreasedoperantResponsesmadeavailabledeliveredcupsecondeitherconsumeaccumulatedefinedpercentagemultiplenumbervariedfunctionvariationsrequirementswhetherproximal31occurredconditionsgenerallyhigherparticularlyfixed-ratio2contributionsassessedcomparing20singlerequiredendnominallyyokedseparatedalwaysgreatersystematicallyrelatedreinforcementrate3increasingprogressive-ratioscheduleresetlikelihoodaparteventhoughnextReinforcerunderstudieddimensionbehaviorrelatesanalysisphenomenahoardingself-controlinvolveaccumulatingversuscollectingconsumingreinforcersDeterminantsreinforcertask

Similar Articles

Cited By