The role of patients' meta-preferences in the design and evaluation of decision support systems.

Jack Dowie
Author Information
  1. Jack Dowie: Public Health and Policy Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK. jack.dowie@lshtm.ac.uk

Abstract

The arrival of new analysis-based decision technologies will necessitate a profound rethinking both of the nature of the patient-doctor relationship and of the way aids and support systems designed to improve decision-making within that relationship are designed and evaluated. One-dimensional typologies of the traditional 'paternalist/shared/informed' sort do not provide the complexity called for by the heterogeneity of patient's 'meta-preferences' regarding their relationship with a doctor on the one hand and regarding the analytical level of judgement and decision-making on the other. A multidimensional matrix embodying this distinction is proposed as a framework of the minimal complexity required for the design and evaluation of the full range of decision aids and decision modes. Essentially aids should be conceived of and evaluated cell-specifically and the search for universally satisfactory decision support systems abandoned. 'shared' and'informed' are best interpreted as attributes which may or not be in line with a patient's meta-preferences. Future research should focus on the higher level goal of better decision-making, a goal that will need to respect and reflect these meta-preferences.

References

J Gen Intern Med. 1989 Jan-Feb;4(1):23-30 [PMID: 2644407]
Lancet. 2000 Mar 18;355(9208):956-62 [PMID: 10768433]
J Health Serv Res Policy. 1997 Apr;2(2):112-21 [PMID: 10180362]
Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(1):35-42 [PMID: 2008619]
Qual Health Care. 2000 Dec;9(4):238-44 [PMID: 11101709]
Patient Educ Couns. 1997 Jun;31(2):151-8 [PMID: 9216356]
Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Jun;49(443):477-82 [PMID: 10562751]
Med Decis Making. 1998 Jul-Sep;18(3):256-67 [PMID: 9679990]
Med Care. 1995 Aug;33(8):765-70 [PMID: 7543638]
Health Care Anal. 1995 Aug;3(3):232-4 [PMID: 10151644]
Med Decis Making. 1995 Jan-Mar;15(1):25-30 [PMID: 7898294]
Med Decis Making. 1996 Jan-Mar;16(1):58-64 [PMID: 8717600]
Med Decis Making. 2001 May-Jun;21(3):241-7 [PMID: 11386631]
Horm Res. 1999;51 Suppl 1:73-82 [PMID: 10393495]
Patient Educ Couns. 1998 Mar;33(3):267-79 [PMID: 9731164]
Med Decis Making. 2000 Jan-Mar;20(1):112-27 [PMID: 10638544]
JAMA. 1992 Apr 22-29;267(16):2221-6 [PMID: 1556799]
Behav Med. 1998 Summer;24(2):81-8 [PMID: 9695899]
Am J Hematol. 1995 Apr;48(4):221-7 [PMID: 7717368]
Med Care. 1999 Mar;37(3):270-84 [PMID: 10098571]
Med Decis Making. 1998 Jul-Sep;18(3):295-303 [PMID: 9679994]
Med Decis Making. 1995 Jan-Mar;15(1):2-3 [PMID: 7898293]
J Health Serv Res Policy. 1998 Apr;3(2):100-7 [PMID: 10180658]
JAMA. 1984 Dec 7;252(21):2990-4 [PMID: 6502860]
BMJ. 1999 Sep 18;319(7212):731-4 [PMID: 10487995]
Cancer. 1995 Dec 1;76(11):2275-85 [PMID: 8635032]
Med Decis Making. 1999 Apr-Jun;19(2):157-66 [PMID: 10231078]
Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Mar;11(1):32-8; discussion 38-9 [PMID: 12078367]
Ann Intern Med. 1992 Jul 1;117(1):53-8 [PMID: 1596048]
Soc Sci Med. 1995 Nov;41(9):1301-10 [PMID: 8545682]
Soc Sci Med. 1998 Aug;47(3):329-39 [PMID: 9681902]
Health Expect. 1999 Mar;2(1):21-32 [PMID: 11281872]
J Clin Oncol. 1995 Apr;13(4):847-53 [PMID: 7707110]
Med Decis Making. 1996 Jul-Sep;16(3):262-82 [PMID: 8818125]
Health Expect. 2000 Mar;3(1):77-85 [PMID: 11281914]
Soc Sci Med. 1997 Mar;44(5):681-92 [PMID: 9032835]
Fam Pract. 1995 Dec;12(4):443-7 [PMID: 8826063]
Health Econ. 2002 Jan;11(1):1-8 [PMID: 11788974]
QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1992 Jun;18(6):183-90 [PMID: 1379705]

MeSH Term

Counseling
Decision Making
Decision Support Systems, Clinical
Humans
Models, Organizational
Patient Participation
Patient Satisfaction
Physician-Patient Relations
Software Design
United Kingdom

Word Cloud

Similar Articles

Cited By