Extinction revisited: similarities between extinction and reductions in US intensity in classical conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response.

E James Kehoe, Natasha E White
Author Information
  1. E James Kehoe: School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia. j.kehoe@unsw.edu.au

Abstract

The mechanisms of extinction were examined by reducing the intensity of the unconditioned stimulus (US) after acquisition training to determine whether such reductions lie on a continuum with CS-alone extinction. The experiments revealed that reductions in US intensity yielded extinction-like effects. Specifically, there were proportional reductions in the daily mean level of responding across sessions. There were also persistent within-session declines and between-session increases of responding analogous to spontaneous recovery. Surprisingly, even when US intensity was held constant, within-session declines and between-session increases were apparent. The results are discussed with respect to possible contributions from unlearning, new learning, generalization decrement, and nonassociative loss, especially CS-specific attentional changes and CR-specific reactive inhibition.

References

  1. Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Jun;1(2):156-81 [PMID: 24203468]
  2. Psychol Rev. 1980 Nov;87(6):532-52 [PMID: 7443916]
  3. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2001 Oct;27(4):354-72 [PMID: 11676086]
  4. Psychol Bull. 1993 Jul;114(1):80-99 [PMID: 8346330]
  5. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2000 Apr;26(2):144-56 [PMID: 10782430]
  6. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2001 Apr;27(2):115-24 [PMID: 11296487]
  7. Q J Exp Psychol B. 1997 Nov;50(4):295-316 [PMID: 9421976]
  8. Psychol Rev. 1955 May;62(3):145-54 [PMID: 14371893]
  9. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 1998 May;69(3):307-19 [PMID: 9707492]
  10. J Exp Psychol. 1958 May;55(5):404-11 [PMID: 13539326]
  11. J Exp Psychol. 1949 Aug;39(4):466-83 [PMID: 18140131]
  12. Psychol Rev. 1951 Sep;58(5):313-23 [PMID: 14883244]
  13. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1992 Apr;18(2):182-92 [PMID: 1583447]
  14. Psychol Rev. 1988 Oct;95(4):411-33 [PMID: 3057526]
  15. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1968 Dec;66(3):679-87 [PMID: 5721496]
  16. Learn Motiv. 1996 Nov;27(4):335-61 [PMID: 8979936]
  17. J Neurosci. 2001 Jun 1;21(11):4081-9 [PMID: 11356896]
  18. Anim Learn Behav. 1978 May;6(2):209-15 [PMID: 680322]
  19. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1982 Jan;8(1):49-61 [PMID: 7057144]
  20. J Exp Psychol. 1961 Nov;62:484-95 [PMID: 13880548]
  21. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1973 Nov;85(2):277-88 [PMID: 4756907]
  22. Psychol Rev. 1981 Mar;88(2):135-70 [PMID: 7291377]
  23. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1975 Jan;1(1):88-96 [PMID: 1151290]
  24. Psychol Rev. 1987 Apr;94(2):176-91 [PMID: 3575584]
  25. Psychol Rev. 2000 Apr;107(2):289-344 [PMID: 10789198]
  26. Q J Exp Psychol B. 2001 Aug;54(3):201-17 [PMID: 11547511]
  27. Behav Neurosci. 1995 Feb;109(1):24-33 [PMID: 7734076]
  28. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1975 Oct;1(4):355-63 [PMID: 1202141]
  29. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Nov;60(3):621-40 [PMID: 8283153]

MeSH Term

Animals
Association Learning
Attention
Blinking
Conditioning, Classical
Conditioning, Eyelid
Extinction, Psychological
Female
Mental Recall
Motivation
Rabbits
Reactive Inhibition

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0intensityUSreductionsextinctionrespondingwithin-sessiondeclinesbetween-sessionincreasesmechanismsexaminedreducingunconditionedstimulusacquisitiontrainingdeterminewhetherliecontinuumCS-aloneexperimentsrevealedyieldedextinction-likeeffectsSpecificallyproportionaldailymeanlevelacrosssessionsalsopersistentanalogousspontaneousrecoverySurprisinglyevenheldconstantapparentresultsdiscussedrespectpossiblecontributionsunlearningnewlearninggeneralizationdecrementnonassociativelossespeciallyCS-specificattentionalchangesCR-specificreactiveinhibitionExtinctionrevisited:similaritiesclassicalconditioningrabbit'snictitatingmembraneresponse

Similar Articles

Cited By