Socio-demographic factors and self-reported functional status: the significance of social support.

S Koukouli, I G Vlachonikolis, A Philalithis
Author Information
  1. S Koukouli: Health Planning Division, Department of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Greece. koukouli@med.uoc.gr

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present work was to investigate the relative importance of socio-demographic and physical health status factors for subjective functioning, as well as to examine the role of social support.
METHODS: A cross-sectional health survey was carried out in a Greek municipality. 1356 adults of the general population were included in the study. Personal interviews were conducted with house-to-house visits. The response rate was 91.2%. Functioning has been measured by five indexes: 'The Social Roles and Mobility' scale (SORM), 'The Self-Care Restrictions' scale (SCR), 'The Serious Limitations' scale (SL), 'The Minor Self-care Limitations' scale (MSCR) and 'The Minor Limitations in Social Roles and Mobility' scale (MSORM).
RESULTS: Among the two sets of independent variables, the socio-demographic ones had significant influence on the functional status, except for MSORM. Allowing for these variables, the physical health status indicators had also significant effects on all functioning scales. Living arrangements and marital status had significant effects on four out of five indexes, while arthritis, Parkinson's disease, past stroke and kidney stones had significant effects on the SCR and SL scales.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that socio-demographic factors are as important as physical health variables in affecting a person's ability to function normally in their everyday life. Social support appears to play a significant role in explaining differences in subjective functioning: people living alone or only with the spouse, particularly the elderly, seem to be in greater risk for disability problems and should be targeted by preventive programs in the community.

References

  1. Am J Epidemiol. 2001 Jan 15;153(2):123-31 [PMID: 11159156]
  2. Am J Epidemiol. 1999 Sep 1;150(5):501-10 [PMID: 10472950]
  3. Int J Health Serv. 1976;6(3):493-508 [PMID: 133997]
  4. Am Sociol Rev. 1978 Aug;43(4):508-20 [PMID: 707911]
  5. Am J Epidemiol. 1979 Feb;109(2):186-204 [PMID: 425958]
  6. Am Sociol Rev. 1979 Feb;44(1):59-80 [PMID: 507572]
  7. AJS. 1981 Jul;87(1):48-74 [PMID: 7258475]
  8. J Gerontol. 1982 May;37(3):323-9 [PMID: 7069156]
  9. Am J Epidemiol. 1983 May;117(5):521-37 [PMID: 6342368]
  10. J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Jun;24(2):160-73 [PMID: 6886370]
  11. Am J Public Health. 1985 May;75(5):502-6 [PMID: 3985238]
  12. Soc Sci Med. 1985;20(6):627-35 [PMID: 4001984]
  13. Psychol Bull. 1985 Sep;98(2):310-57 [PMID: 3901065]
  14. J Health Soc Behav. 1986 Mar;27(1):78-89 [PMID: 3711634]
  15. Soc Sci Med. 1987;25(1):29-34 [PMID: 2956688]
  16. Med Care. 1987 Dec;25(12):1148-60 [PMID: 3501048]
  17. Soc Sci Med. 1988;26(2):201-8 [PMID: 3347847]
  18. J Health Soc Behav. 1989 Sep;30(3):282-304 [PMID: 2778300]
  19. Demography. 1990 May;27(2):233-50 [PMID: 2332088]
  20. Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(4):425-36 [PMID: 2024158]
  21. Soc Sci Med. 1992 Mar;34(5):523-32 [PMID: 1604359]
  22. Soc Sci Med. 1992 Aug;35(4):453-64 [PMID: 1519098]
  23. BMJ. 1992 Oct 24;305(6860):1001-4 [PMID: 1458108]
  24. Arthritis Rheum. 1993 May;36(5):581-8 [PMID: 8489537]
  25. Demography. 1993 May;30(2):189-208 [PMID: 8500636]
  26. N Engl J Med. 1993 Jul 8;329(2):103-9 [PMID: 8510686]
  27. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Oct;46(10):1129-40 [PMID: 8410098]
  28. Disabil Rehabil. 1993 Oct-Dec;15(4):161-78 [PMID: 8219245]
  29. Soc Sci Med. 1994 Jan;38(1):1-14 [PMID: 8146699]
  30. Int J Epidemiol. 1994 Feb;23(1):91-7 [PMID: 8194929]
  31. J Gerontol. 1994 Jul;49(4):S196-201 [PMID: 8014403]
  32. Med Care. 1994 Sep;32(9):930-42 [PMID: 8090045]
  33. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994 Jul;47(7):747-60 [PMID: 7722588]
  34. J Health Soc Behav. 1996 Mar;37(1):104-20 [PMID: 8820314]
  35. Am J Epidemiol. 1998 Feb 15;147(4):370-8 [PMID: 9508104]
  36. Soc Sci Med. 1999 Feb;48(4):445-69 [PMID: 10075171]
  37. Soc Sci Med. 1999 May;48(9):1161-72 [PMID: 10220017]
  38. J Health Soc Behav. 1969 Jun;10(2):105-15 [PMID: 5791235]

MeSH Term

Activities of Daily Living
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Analysis of Variance
Chronic Disease
Cross-Sectional Studies
Persons with Disabilities
Family Characteristics
Female
Greece
Health Services
Health Status Indicators
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Physical Fitness
Regression Analysis
Self Efficacy
Social Support
Socioeconomic Factors

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0'Thescalesignificanthealthstatussocio-demographicphysicalfactorssupportSocialvariableseffectssubjectivefunctioningrolesocialfiveRolesMobility'SCRLimitations'SLMinorMSORMfunctionalscalesBACKGROUND:aimpresentworkinvestigaterelativeimportancewellexamineMETHODS:cross-sectionalsurveycarriedGreekmunicipality1356adultsgeneralpopulationincludedstudyPersonalinterviewsconductedhouse-to-housevisitsresponserate912%Functioningmeasuredindexes:SORMSelf-CareRestrictions'SeriousSelf-careMSCRLimitationsRESULTS:AmongtwosetsindependentonesinfluenceexceptAllowingindicatorsalsoLivingarrangementsmaritalfourindexesarthritisParkinson'sdiseasepaststrokekidneystonesCONCLUSIONS:resultssuggestimportantaffectingperson'sabilityfunctionnormallyeverydaylifeappearsplayexplainingdifferencesfunctioning:peoplelivingalonespouseparticularlyelderlyseemgreaterriskdisabilityproblemstargetedpreventiveprogramscommunitySocio-demographicself-reportedstatus:significance

Similar Articles

Cited By (21)