Primary care mental health workers: models of working and evidence of effectiveness.

Peter Bower
Author Information
  1. Peter Bower: National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester. peter.bower@man.ac.uk

Abstract

The NHS Plan proposed the creation of a new role in primary care to assist with the management of common mental health problems: the primary care mental health worker (PCMHW). However, it is not clear how PCMHWs should be employed to be most effective. Current literature concerning different models of mental health care is reviewed. This suggests that four key dimensions are of relevance: the types of patients that PCMHWs will manage; the degree to which PCMHWs will work autonomously, or as part of a system of care; at what stage in patients' illness trajectory they will intervene; and whether the role of PCMHWs will be related to clinical interventions, or whether they will have a wider, non-clinical role in the organisation and monitoring of care. Finally, published data concerning relevant interventions are presented. Experimental studies reporting the empirical outcomes associated with these models are reviewed in relation to four different outcomes: clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness, patient satisfaction, and access to care. The data suggest that problem-solving therapy, group psycho-education, self-help, and some models of 'collaborative care' may be highly relevant to PCMHWs. Each model provides different advantages and disadvantages in terms of the four dimensions of outcome.

References

  1. Br J Gen Pract. 1998 Jan;48(426):875-9 [PMID: 9604408]
  2. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998 Jul;55(7):645-51 [PMID: 9672056]
  3. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998 Jul;59(7):358-65 [PMID: 9714264]
  4. Br J Psychiatry. 1998 Apr;172:359-63 [PMID: 9715340]
  5. Ann Intern Med. 1998 Oct 15;129(8):654-6 [PMID: 9786814]
  6. Am J Psychiatry. 1999 Apr;156(4):643-5 [PMID: 10200750]
  7. Br J Psychiatry. 1999 Mar;174:219-24 [PMID: 10448446]
  8. Br J Psychiatry. 1999 Mar;174:225-32 [PMID: 10448447]
  9. BMJ. 1999 Sep 4;319(7210):612-5 [PMID: 10473477]
  10. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1999 Jul-Aug;21(4):260-73 [PMID: 10514950]
  11. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999 Dec;56(12):1109-15 [PMID: 10591288]
  12. BMJ. 2000 Jan 1;320(7226):26-30 [PMID: 10617523]
  13. Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Jan;49(438):47-8 [PMID: 10622018]
  14. BMJ. 2000 Feb 12;320(7232):419-23 [PMID: 10669447]
  15. BMJ. 2000 Feb 26;320(7234):550-4 [PMID: 10688563]
  16. Arch Fam Med. 2000 Apr;9(4):345-51 [PMID: 10776363]
  17. BMJ. 2000 Jul 1;321(7252):1-2 [PMID: 10875807]
  18. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2000 Mar-Apr;22(2):84-96 [PMID: 10896498]
  19. Br J Gen Pract. 2000 Apr;50(453):313-8 [PMID: 10897519]
  20. Br J Gen Pract. 2000 May;50(454):396-400 [PMID: 10897540]
  21. Arch Fam Med. 2000 Aug;9(8):700-8 [PMID: 10927707]
  22. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000 Aug;68(4):573-9 [PMID: 10965632]
  23. JAMA. 2000 Sep 27;284(12):1519-26 [PMID: 11000645]
  24. Br J Gen Pract. 2000 Aug;50(457):626-9 [PMID: 11042913]
  25. Soc Sci Med. 2000 Dec;51(11):1611-25 [PMID: 11072882]
  26. BMJ. 2000 Dec 2;321(7273):1383-8 [PMID: 11099284]
  27. BMJ. 2000 Dec 2;321(7273):1389-92 [PMID: 11099285]
  28. Br J Psychiatry. 2000 Oct;177:312-8 [PMID: 11116771]
  29. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001 Feb;58(2):181-7 [PMID: 11177120]
  30. BMJ. 2001 Feb 17;322(7283):406-9 [PMID: 11179161]
  31. BMJ. 2001 Feb 17;322(7283):419-21 [PMID: 11179166]
  32. BMJ. 2001 Feb 24;322(7284):444-5 [PMID: 11222407]
  33. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001 Mar;58(3):241-7 [PMID: 11231831]
  34. BMJ. 2001 Mar 31;322(7289):746-7 [PMID: 11282845]
  35. BMJ. 2001 Mar 31;322(7289):772-5 [PMID: 11282864]
  36. Fam Pract. 2001 Aug;18(4):373-82 [PMID: 11477044]
  37. Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Oct;51(471):838-45 [PMID: 11677710]
  38. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1981 Jan 31;282(6261):375-7 [PMID: 6780033]
  39. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1982 Jan;32(234):32-7 [PMID: 7086742]
  40. Br J Psychiatry. 1984 Apr;144:400-6 [PMID: 6372925]
  41. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Jun 16;288(6433):1805-8 [PMID: 6428555]
  42. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Apr 20;290(6476):1181-4 [PMID: 3921146]
  43. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1985 May;35(274):239-42 [PMID: 4020747]
  44. Br J Psychiatry. 1985 Oct;147:371-9 [PMID: 4075024]
  45. Med Care. 1987 Nov;25(11):1078-88 [PMID: 3695638]
  46. BMJ. 1989 Jan 28;298(6668):223-6 [PMID: 2493868]
  47. Behav Med. 1990 Winter;16(4):165-73 [PMID: 2271802]
  48. Health Visit. 1991 Dec;64(12):415-7 [PMID: 1765528]
  49. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1992 Mar;14(2):86-98 [PMID: 1592254]
  50. BMJ. 1992 Apr 4;304(6831):883-7 [PMID: 1392754]
  51. BMJ. 1993 Jan 2;306(6869):29-33 [PMID: 8435574]
  52. Br J Psychiatry. 1993 Mar;162:375-84 [PMID: 8453434]
  53. Psychol Med. 1993 Feb;23(1):229-37 [PMID: 8475211]
  54. Br J Gen Pract. 1993 Dec;43(377):507-11 [PMID: 8312022]
  55. Psychosom Med. 1994 Mar-Apr;56(2):136-41 [PMID: 8008800]
  56. BMJ. 1995 Feb 18;310(6977):441-5 [PMID: 7873952]
  57. Psychol Med. 1996 May;26(3):487-92 [PMID: 8733207]
  58. J Affect Disord. 1996 Jul 29;39(3):209-16 [PMID: 8856425]
  59. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1996 Oct;53(10):913-9 [PMID: 8857868]
  60. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1996 Oct;53(10):924-32 [PMID: 8857869]
  61. BMJ. 1996 Oct 5;313(7061):858-9 [PMID: 8870574]
  62. Milbank Q. 1996;74(4):511-44 [PMID: 8941260]
  63. JAMA. 1995 Apr 5;273(13):1026-31 [PMID: 7897786]
  64. Am J Community Psychol. 1995 Apr;23(2):199-222 [PMID: 7572830]
  65. BMJ. 1996 Jul 20;313(7050):158-60 [PMID: 8688780]
  66. Br J Psychiatry. 1997 Jan;170:6-11 [PMID: 9068767]
  67. J Fam Pract. 1997 Mar;44(3):293-8 [PMID: 9071250]
  68. Br J Psychiatry. 1997 Feb;170:113-9 [PMID: 9093498]
  69. BMJ. 1997 Mar 29;314(7085):932-6 [PMID: 9099116]
  70. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1997 May;19(3):169-78 [PMID: 9218985]
  71. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1997 Jul;19(4):251-8 [PMID: 9327254]
  72. Br J Psychiatry. 1997 Aug;171:131-4 [PMID: 9337947]
  73. Psychol Med. 1997 Nov;27(6):1325-36 [PMID: 9403904]

MeSH Term

Case Management
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Health Services Accessibility
Humans
Mental Disorders
Mental Health Services
Patient Satisfaction
Primary Health Care
Professional Role
State Medicine
Treatment Outcome
United Kingdom
Workforce

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0carePCMHWswillmentalhealthmodelsroledifferentfoureffectivenessprimaryconcerningrevieweddimensionswhetherclinicalinterventionsdatarelevantNHSPlanproposedcreationnewassistmanagementcommonproblems:workerPCMHWHoweverclearemployedeffectiveCurrentliteraturesuggestskeyrelevance:typespatientsmanagedegreeworkautonomouslypartsystemstagepatients'illnesstrajectoryintervenerelatedwidernon-clinicalorganisationmonitoringFinallypublishedpresentedExperimentalstudiesreportingempiricaloutcomesassociatedrelationoutcomes:costpatientsatisfactionaccesssuggestproblem-solvingtherapygrouppsycho-educationself-help'collaborativecare'mayhighlymodelprovidesadvantagesdisadvantagestermsoutcomePrimaryworkers:workingevidence

Similar Articles

Cited By