Stimulus control topographies and tests of symmetry in pigeons.

Karen M Lionello-DeNolf, Peter J Urcuioli
Author Information
  1. Karen M Lionello-DeNolf: Purdue University, USA. Karen.Lionello-DeNolf@umassmed.edu

Abstract

Pigeons were tested for symmetry after A-B training under conditions designed to avoid problems that may prevent its emergence, namely the change of stimulus location in testing relative to training and the lack of requisite discrimination training. In Experiment 1, samples appeared in two locations during baseline training to minimize the impact of stimulus location. Experiments 2 and 3 included multiple-location training along with additional identity and symbolic matching training, respectively, to explicitly train all of the simultaneous and successive stimulus discriminations required for testing. Experiment 4 provided reinforcement for symmetrical matching relations with some stimulus sets (with multiple-location training) prior to symmetry testing with different sets. In all experiments, pigeons showed no evidence of symmetry despite the fact that baseline (A-B) matching transferred to novel locations. Additional tests for reflexivity (Experiment 2) yielded similar outcomes. These results indicate that the change in stimulus location is not the sole reason that pigeons do not show symmetry and increase the plausibility of arguments that symmetry and other indexes of stimulus equivalence may be beyond the capabilities of the pigeon.

References

  1. J Exp Anal Behav. 2000 Mar;73(2):141-61 [PMID: 10784006]
  2. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):5-22 [PMID: 7057129]
  3. J Speech Hear Res. 1971 Mar;14(1):5-13 [PMID: 5550631]
  4. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jan;21(1):19-26 [PMID: 4204143]
  5. J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 Nov;70(3):235-51 [PMID: 9821678]
  6. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Jul;44(1):35-47 [PMID: 16812425]
  7. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1988 Apr;14(2):140-5 [PMID: 3367100]
  8. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 May;45(3):297-304 [PMID: 3711776]
  9. J Exp Anal Behav. 1999 Jul;72(1):97-115 [PMID: 16812912]
  10. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Sep;22(2):261-73 [PMID: 4411822]
  11. J Exp Anal Behav. 1999 Jul;72(1):117-37 [PMID: 10418157]
  12. J Exp Anal Behav. 2000 Jan;73(1):5-22 [PMID: 10682337]
  13. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Jul;58(1):173-82 [PMID: 1645099]
  14. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Jul;11(4):435-41 [PMID: 5672251]
  15. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Nov;62(3):399-408 [PMID: 16812749]
  16. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):23-44 [PMID: 7057127]
  17. J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Jan;65(1):185-241 [PMID: 16812780]
  18. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 May;49(3):395-409 [PMID: 16812547]
  19. J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 Sep;76(2):131-58 [PMID: 11599636]
  20. J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 Jul;68(1):27-45 [PMID: 16812849]

Grants

  1. MH56487/NIMH NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Animals
Appetitive Behavior
Attention
Color Perception
Concept Formation
Discrimination Learning
Generalization, Stimulus
Orientation
Pattern Recognition, Visual
Problem Solving
Transfer, Psychology

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0trainingsymmetrystimuluslocationtestingExperimentmatchingpigeonsA-Bmaychangelocationsbaseline2multiple-locationsetstestsPigeonstestedconditionsdesignedavoidproblemspreventemergencenamelyrelativelackrequisitediscrimination1samplesappearedtwominimizeimpactExperiments3includedalongadditionalidentitysymbolicrespectivelyexplicitlytrainsimultaneoussuccessivediscriminationsrequired4providedreinforcementsymmetricalrelationspriordifferentexperimentsshowedevidencedespitefacttransferrednovelAdditionalreflexivityyieldedsimilaroutcomesresultsindicatesolereasonshowincreaseplausibilityargumentsindexesequivalencebeyondcapabilitiespigeonStimuluscontroltopographies

Similar Articles

Cited By