Is smoking delayed smoking averted?

Sherry Glied
Author Information
  1. Sherry Glied: Department of Health Policy and Management, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA. sag1@columbia.edu

Abstract

Antismoking efforts often target teenagers in the hope of producing a new generation of never smokers. Teenagers are more responsive to tobacco taxes than are adults. The author summarizes recent evidence suggesting that delaying smoking initiation among teenagers through higher taxes does not generate proportionate reductions in prevalence rates through adulthood. In consequence, the impact of taxes on smoking among youths overstates the potential long-term public health effects of this tobacco control strategy.

References

MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2001 Oct 12;50(40):869-73 [PMID: 11666113]
Res Popul Econ. 1991;7:3-91 [PMID: 12317032]
J Health Econ. 2002 Jan;21(1):117-35 [PMID: 11845920]
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2002 May 17;51(19):409-12 [PMID: 12033476]
Am J Public Health. 1994 Apr;84(4):543-7 [PMID: 8154552]
Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Apr;85(4):625-30 [PMID: 7898845]
Am J Public Health. 1996 Feb;86(2):214-20 [PMID: 8633738]
J Health Econ. 1999 Jan;18(1):1-29 [PMID: 10338816]

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adolescent Behavior
Adult
Age Factors
Age of Onset
Child Advocacy
Health Promotion
Humans
Policy Making
Prevalence
Risk Reduction Behavior
Smoking
Smoking Prevention
Taxes
Time
Tobacco Industry
United States

Word Cloud

Similar Articles

Cited By