Genetic mapping of variation in spatial learning in the mouse.

Daniela Steinberger, David S Reynolds, Pushpindar Ferris, Rachael Lincoln, Susmita Datta, Joanna Stanley, Andrea Paterson, Gerard R Dawson, Jonathan Flint
Author Information
  1. Daniela Steinberger: Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Oxford, OX3 7BN, United Kingdom.

Abstract

Inbred strains of mice are known to differ in their performance in the Morris water maze task, a test of spatial discrimination and place navigation in rodents, but the genetic basis of individual variation in spatial learning is unknown. We have mapped genetic effects that contribute to the difference between two strains, DBA/2 and C57BL6/J, using an F2 intercross and methods to detect quantitative trait loci (QTL). We found two QTL, one on chromosome 4 and one on chromosome 12, that influence behavior in the probe trial of the water maze (genome-wide significance p = 0.017 and 0.015, respectively). By including tests of avoidance conditioning and behavior in a novel environment, we show that the QTL on chromosomes 4 and 12 specifically influence variation in spatial learning. QTL that influence differences in fearful behavior (on chromosomes 1, 3, 7, 15, and 19) operate while mice are trained in the water maze apparatus.

References

  1. Neuroscience. 1999 Apr;90(1):1-13 [PMID: 10188929]
  2. Behav Brain Res. 1999 Apr;100(1-2):225-35 [PMID: 10212070]
  3. Nat Neurosci. 1999 Jul;2(7):597-604 [PMID: 10404178]
  4. Genetics. 2001 Apr;157(4):1789-803 [PMID: 11290731]
  5. Curr Biol. 2001 May 15;11(10):725-34 [PMID: 11378382]
  6. Genome Res. 2001 Jun;11(6):959-80 [PMID: 11381025]
  7. Nat Rev Genet. 2001 Jun;2(6):437-45 [PMID: 11389460]
  8. Genetics. 2001 Jul;158(3):1217-26 [PMID: 11454769]
  9. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2001 Aug;36(1):60-90 [PMID: 11516773]
  10. Behav Brain Res. 2001 Nov 1;125(1-2):261-7 [PMID: 11682117]
  11. Genome Res. 2002 Apr;12(4):618-26 [PMID: 11932246]
  12. Behav Genet. 2002 Jan;32(1):69-78 [PMID: 11958544]
  13. Am J Hum Genet. 1990 Aug;47(2):247-54 [PMID: 2378349]
  14. Theor Appl Genet. 1995 May;90(6):776-86 [PMID: 24172919]
  15. Nature. 1969 Jan 4;221(5175):65-6 [PMID: 5782616]
  16. Science. 1966 Dec 23;154(3756):1577-9 [PMID: 5924928]
  17. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1967 Apr;63(2):320-3 [PMID: 6050039]
  18. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1983 Summer;7(2):119-88 [PMID: 6348604]
  19. Genetics. 1995 Jul;140(3):1111-27 [PMID: 7672582]
  20. Genetics. 1995 Jul;140(3):1137-47 [PMID: 7672584]
  21. Genetics. 1994 Apr;136(4):1457-68 [PMID: 8013918]
  22. Am J Hum Genet. 1993 Nov;53(5):1127-36 [PMID: 8213836]
  23. Behav Genet. 1996 Mar;26(2):149-60 [PMID: 8639150]
  24. Genetics. 1996 Jun;143(2):1013-20 [PMID: 8725246]
  25. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1997;20:157-84 [PMID: 9056711]
  26. Behav Genet. 1997 May;27(3):201-10 [PMID: 9210791]
  27. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1997 Jul;132(2):107-24 [PMID: 9266608]
  28. Nat Genet. 1997 Nov;17(3):331-4 [PMID: 9354800]
  29. Nat Genet. 1997 Nov;17(3):335-7 [PMID: 9354801]
  30. Genomics. 1997 Nov 15;46(1):1-8 [PMID: 9403052]

Grants

  1. /Wellcome Trust

MeSH Term

Animals
Avoidance Learning
Behavior, Animal
Chromosome Mapping
Chromosomes, Mammalian
Conditioning, Psychological
Crosses, Genetic
Electroshock
Fear
Genetic Variation
Lod Score
Male
Maze Learning
Mice
Mice, Inbred C57BL
Mice, Inbred DBA
Multivariate Analysis
Quantitative Trait Loci
Reaction Time
Spatial Behavior
Species Specificity

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0spatialQTLwatermazevariationlearninginfluencebehaviorstrainsmicegenetictwoonechromosome4120chromosomesInbredknowndifferperformanceMorristasktestdiscriminationplacenavigationrodentsbasisindividualunknownmappedeffectscontributedifferenceDBA/2C57BL6/JusingF2intercrossmethodsdetectquantitativetraitlocifoundprobetrialgenome-widesignificancep=017015respectivelyincludingtestsavoidanceconditioningnovelenvironmentshowspecificallydifferencesfearful1371519operatetrainedapparatusGeneticmappingmouse

Similar Articles

Cited By