"...And this little pig saved lives!".

A L Caplan
Author Information
  1. A L Caplan: Center for Bioethics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Abstract

The harvesting and transplantation of organs from genetically altered pigs has sparked an escalating debate within the transplant community worldwide. The ethical and moral arguments against using another life form to save humans--as well as using humans for experimentation--run side by side with the potential medical considerations of inadvertently unleashing heretofore unknown virulent agents on the public. Nonetheless, the ethical case against xenografting, while compelling and worthy of more public and expert debate and discussion, is not persuasive. Genetically altered pigs might not be able to save human lives at present, but the time has come to take a tentative step to see whether they can in the future.

Keywords

MeSH Term

Animals
Animals, Genetically Modified
Clinical Trials as Topic
Disease Transmission, Infectious
Humans
Risk Assessment
Swine
Therapeutic Human Experimentation
Tissue and Organ Harvesting
Transplantation, Heterologous

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0alteredpigsdebateethicalusingsavesidepublicHealthharvestingtransplantationorgansgeneticallysparkedescalatingwithintransplantcommunityworldwidemoralargumentsanotherlifeformhumans--aswellhumansexperimentation--runpotentialmedicalconsiderationsinadvertentlyunleashingheretoforeunknownvirulentagentsNonethelesscasexenograftingcompellingworthyexpertdiscussionpersuasiveGeneticallymightablehumanlivespresenttimecometaketentativestepseewhethercanfuture"Andlittlepigsavedlives!"CarePublic

Similar Articles

Cited By