Fatigue in employees with diabetes: its relation with work characteristics and diabetes related burden.

I Weijman, W J G Ros, G E H M Rutten, W B Schaufeli, M J Schabracq, J A M Winnubst
Author Information
  1. I Weijman: Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Netherlands. i.weijman@med.uu.nl

Abstract

AIMS: To examine the relations between work characteristics as defined by the Job Demand-Control-Support model (JDCS) (that is, job demands, decision latitude, and social support), diabetes related burden (symptoms, seriousness of disease, self care activities, and disease duration), and fatigue in employees with diabetes mellitus.
METHODS: Employees (n = 292) aged 30-60 years, with insulin treated diabetes, filled in self administered questionnaires that assess the above mentioned components of the JDCS model and diabetes related burdens.
RESULTS: Both work and diabetes related factors are related to fatigue in employees with diabetes. Regression analyses revealed that work characteristics explain 19.1% of the variance in fatigue; lack of support, and the interaction of job demands and job control contribute significantly. Diabetes related factors explain another 29.0% of the variance, with the focus on diabetes related symptoms and the burden of adjusting insulin dosage to circumstances. Fatigue is more severe in case of lack of social support at work, high job demands in combination with a lack of decision latitude, more burden of adjusting insulin dosage to circumstances, and more diabetic symptoms. Furthermore, regression analysis revealed that diabetic symptoms and the burden of adjusting the insulin dosage to circumstances are especially relevant in combination with high job demands.
CONCLUSIONS: Both diabetes and work should be taken into consideration-by (occupational) physicians as well as supervisors-in the communication with people with diabetes.

References

  1. Diabetes Care. 1992 Jul;15(7):842-6 [PMID: 1516502]
  2. Diabet Med. 1994 Apr;11(3):253-61 [PMID: 8033523]
  3. Diabet Med. 1997 Oct;14(10):871-6 [PMID: 9371481]
  4. Diabetes Care. 1999 Jul;22(7):1105-9 [PMID: 10388975]
  5. J Occup Health Psychol. 2000 Oct;5(4):411-6 [PMID: 11051524]
  6. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1992 Apr;46(2):92-7 [PMID: 1583440]
  7. Occup Environ Med. 2001 Jul;58(7):432-6 [PMID: 11404446]
  8. J Psychosom Res. 2002 Jun;52(6):445-52 [PMID: 12069868]
  9. Occup Environ Med. 2002 Oct;59(10):712-3 [PMID: 12356934]
  10. Prev Med. 1986 Jan;15(1):74-81 [PMID: 3714661]
  11. Am J Public Health. 1988 Oct;78(10):1336-42 [PMID: 3421392]
  12. Am J Public Health. 2001 Jan;91(1):129-30 [PMID: 11189805]

MeSH Term

Adult
Diabetes Complications
Fatigue
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Occupational Health
Social Support
Work Schedule Tolerance

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0diabetesrelatedworkjobburdendemandssymptomsinsulincharacteristicssupportfatigueemployeeslackadjustingdosagecircumstancesmodelJDCSdecisionlatitudesocialdiseaseselffactorsrevealedexplainvarianceFatiguehighcombinationdiabeticAIMS:examinerelationsdefinedJobDemand-Control-SupportseriousnesscareactivitiesdurationmellitusMETHODS:Employeesn=292aged30-60yearstreatedfilledadministeredquestionnairesassessmentionedcomponentsburdensRESULTS:Regressionanalyses191%interactioncontrolcontributesignificantlyDiabetesanother290%focusseverecaseFurthermoreregressionanalysisespeciallyrelevantCONCLUSIONS:takenconsideration-byoccupationalphysicianswellsupervisors-incommunicationpeoplediabetes:relation

Similar Articles

Cited By