Clinical utility and cost effectiveness of a personal ultrasound imager for cardiac evaluation during consultation rounds in patients with suspected cardiac disease.

E C Vourvouri, L Y Koroleva, F J Ten Cate, D Poldermans, A F L Schinkel, R T van Domburg, W B Vletter, J R T C Roelandt
Author Information
  1. E C Vourvouri: Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcentre, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical utility and cost effectiveness of a personal ultrasound imager (PUI) during consultation rounds for cardiac evaluation of patients with suspected cardiac disease.
METHODS: 107 unselected patients from non-cardiac departments (55% men) were enrolled in the study. After the physical examination the consultant cardiologist performed an echocardiographic study with a PUI. The final report was given instantly to the referring physician. All patients subsequently underwent a study with a standard echocardiographic device (SED). For each patient the consultant cardiologist noted whether the findings of the PUI were adequate for final diagnosis. The total cost when full echocardiography was used was compared with the cost when the PUI was used. The time interval from request to diagnosis was also compared.
RESULTS: In 84 (78.5%) patients no further examination with an SED was regarded as necessary. Twenty three patients (21.5%) required a further detailed examination with the SED because of the need for haemodynamic information. There was an excellent agreement for the detection of abnormalities between the two devices (96%). The total cost was euro;132 per patient with the SED and euro;75 per patient with the PUI. According to this study, the use of the PUI can lead to a 33.4% reduction of total cost. The mean time from request to diagnosis at the authors' institution was four days for the SED and instantly for the PUI, for additional potential cost savings.
CONCLUSIONS: Immediate echocardiographic assessment during consultation rounds can lead to significant cost savings and can shorten the time to diagnosis.

References

  1. Eur Heart J. 2002 Apr;23(7):523-7 [PMID: 11922641]
  2. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2000 Jul;13(7):674-9 [PMID: 10887352]
  3. Am J Med. 2000 Mar;108(4):331-3 [PMID: 11014726]
  4. Am Heart J. 2001 Aug;142(2):324-30 [PMID: 11479473]
  5. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2001 Oct;22(4):352-4 [PMID: 11563896]
  6. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2002 Jan;15(1):80-5 [PMID: 11781559]
  7. JAMA. 1997 Sep 3;278(9):717-22 [PMID: 9286830]
  8. Eur Heart J. 2002 Oct;23(19):1516-21 [PMID: 12242071]
  9. Am J Cardiol. 1991 May 1;67(11):1027-30 [PMID: 2018006]
  10. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Jan;25(1):16-9 [PMID: 7798495]
  11. Clin J Sport Med. 1995;5(2):86-9 [PMID: 7882118]
  12. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1995 May-Jun;8(3):280-4 [PMID: 7640021]
  13. Hypertension. 1997 Feb;29(2):560-3 [PMID: 9040438]

MeSH Term

Ambulatory Care
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Echocardiography
Female
Heart Diseases
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Physical Examination
Point-of-Care Systems

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0costPUIpatientsSEDcardiacstudydiagnosisconsultationroundsexaminationechocardiographicpatienttotaltimecanutilityeffectivenesspersonalultrasoundimagerevaluationsuspecteddiseaseconsultantcardiologistfinalinstantlyusedcomparedrequest5%europerleadsavingsOBJECTIVE:assessclinicalMETHODS:107unselectednon-cardiacdepartments55%menenrolledphysicalperformedreportgivenreferringphysiciansubsequentlyunderwentstandarddevicenotedwhetherfindingsadequatefullechocardiographyintervalalsoRESULTS:8478regardednecessaryTwentythree21requireddetailedneedhaemodynamicinformationexcellentagreementdetectionabnormalitiestwodevices96%13275Accordinguse334%reductionmeanauthors'institutionfourdaysadditionalpotentialCONCLUSIONS:ImmediateassessmentsignificantshortenClinical

Similar Articles

Cited By