Nonclosure of peritoneum: a reappraisal.

Togas Tulandi, Dania Al-Jaroudi
Author Information
  1. Togas Tulandi: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. togas.tulandi@mcgill.ca

Abstract

In our specialty, the practice of closing or not closing the peritoneum is still being debated. Our purpose was to review the literature on the subject, to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the procedure, and to provide clinical opinions. Closure of the peritoneum either parietal or visceral peritoneum is unnecessary, it is associated with a slightly longer operating time and more postoperative pain, and there are some suggestions that it might cause more adhesion formation. There are more advantages than disadvantages to not closing the peritoneum. We encourage clinicians not to close both parietal and visceral peritoneum.

MeSH Term

Animals
Cesarean Section
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures
Humans
Peritoneum
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Regeneration
Surgical Procedures, Operative
Sutures
Wound Healing

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0peritoneumclosingadvantagesdisadvantagesparietalvisceralspecialtypracticestilldebatedpurposereviewliteraturesubjectevaluateprocedureprovideclinicalopinionsClosureeitherunnecessaryassociatedslightlylongeroperatingtimepostoperativepainsuggestionsmightcauseadhesionformationencourageclinicianscloseNonclosureperitoneum:reappraisal

Similar Articles

Cited By