Biodiversity as spatial insurance in heterogeneous landscapes.

Michel Loreau, Nicolas Mouquet, Andrew Gonzalez
Author Information
  1. Michel Loreau: Laboratoire d'Ecologie, Unité Mixte de Recherche 7625, Ecole Normale Supérieure, 46 Rue d'Ulm, F-75230 Paris Cedex 05, France. Loreau@ens.fr

Abstract

The potential consequences of biodiversity loss for ecosystem functioning and services at local scales have received considerable attention during the last decade, but little is known about how biodiversity affects ecosystem processes and stability at larger spatial scales. We propose that biodiversity provides spatial insurance for ecosystem functioning by virtue of spatial exchanges among local systems in heterogeneous landscapes. We explore this hypothesis by using a simple theoretical metacommunity model with explicit local consumer-resource dynamics and dispersal among systems. Our model shows that variation in dispersal rate affects the temporal mean and variability of ecosystem productivity strongly and nonmonotonically through two mechanisms: spatial averaging by the intermediate-type species that tends to dominate the landscape at high dispersal rates, and functional compensations between species that are made possible by the maintenance of species diversity. The spatial insurance effects of species diversity are highest at the intermediate dispersal rates that maximize local diversity. These results have profound implications for conservation and management. Knowledge of spatial processes across ecosystems is critical to predict the effects of landscape changes on both biodiversity and ecosystem functioning and services.

References

  1. Nature. 2002 Jan 24;415(6870):426-9 [PMID: 11807553]
  2. Nature. 2001 Jul 5;412(6842):72-6 [PMID: 11452308]
  3. Science. 2001 Oct 26;294(5543):843-5 [PMID: 11679667]
  4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Sep 25;98(20):11376-81 [PMID: 11535803]
  5. Am Nat. 1999 Oct;154(4):427-440 [PMID: 10523489]
  6. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Feb 16;96(4):1463-8 [PMID: 9990046]
  7. Am Nat. 2002 Apr;159(4):388-95 [PMID: 18707423]
  8. Science. 1999 Nov 5;286(5442):1123-7 [PMID: 10550043]
  9. Science. 2001 Oct 26;294(5543):804-8 [PMID: 11679658]
  10. Science. 1999 Oct 15;286(5439):542-4 [PMID: 10521351]
  11. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Nov 12;99(23):14872-7 [PMID: 12417745]
  12. Am Nat. 2000 Nov;156(5):534-552 [PMID: 29587515]
  13. Am Nat. 2002 Apr;159(4):420-6 [PMID: 18707425]
  14. Am Nat. 1998 Mar;151(3):264-76 [PMID: 18811357]

MeSH Term

Biodiversity
Ecosystem
Environment
Models, Biological

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0spatialecosystembiodiversitylocaldispersalspeciesfunctioninginsurancediversityservicesscalesaffectsprocessesamongsystemsheterogeneouslandscapesmodellandscaperateseffectspotentialconsequenceslossreceivedconsiderableattentionlastdecadelittleknownstabilitylargerproposeprovidesvirtueexchangesexplorehypothesisusingsimpletheoreticalmetacommunityexplicitconsumer-resourcedynamicsshowsvariationratetemporalmeanvariabilityproductivitystronglynonmonotonicallytwomechanisms:averagingintermediate-typetendsdominatehighfunctionalcompensationsmadepossiblemaintenancehighestintermediatemaximizeresultsprofoundimplicationsconservationmanagementKnowledgeacrossecosystemscriticalpredictchangesBiodiversity

Similar Articles

Cited By