Long-term spinal cord injury increases susceptibility to isometric contraction-induced muscle injury.

C Scott Bickel, Jill M Slade, Gary A Dudley
Author Information
  1. C Scott Bickel: Department of Physical Therapy, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 1900 Gravier Street, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA. cbicke@lsuhsc.edu

Abstract

Complete spinal cord injury (SCI) results in inactivation and unloading of affected skeletal muscles. Unloading causes an increased susceptibility of muscle to contraction-induced injury. This study used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to test the hypothesis that isometric contractions would evoke greater muscle damage to the quadriceps femoris muscle (mQF) of SCI subjects than that of able-bodied (AB) controls. MR images were taken of the mQF prior to, immediately post, and 3 days post electromyostimulation (EMS). EMS consisted of five sets of ten isometric contractions (2 s on/6 s off, 1 min between sets) followed by another three sets of ten isometric contractions (1 s on/1 s off, 30 s between sets). Average muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) and the relative areas of stimulated and injured muscle were obtained from MR images by quantifying the number of pixels with an elevated T2 signal. SCI subjects had significantly greater relative area [90 (2)% versus 66 (4)%, P<0.05; mean (SE)] but a lesser absolute area [16 (3) cm(2) versus 44 (6) cm(2), P<0.05] of mQF stimulated than AB controls. During EMS, peak torque was reduced by 66% and 37% for SCI and control subjects, respectively. Three days post EMS, there was a greater relative area of stimulated mQF injured for the SCI subjects [25 (6)% versus 2 (1)%, P<0.05]. Peak torque remained decreased by 22% on day 3 in the SCI group only. These results indicate that affected muscle years after SCI is more susceptible to contraction-induced muscle damage, as determined by MRI, compared to AB controls. They also support the contention that electrically elicited isometric contractions are sufficient to cause muscle damage after a prolonged period of inactivity.

References

  1. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1976;8(1):37-42 [PMID: 132700]
  2. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001 Aug;33(8):1304-10 [PMID: 11474331]
  3. Int J Sports Med. 1986 Feb;7(1):6-12 [PMID: 3957520]
  4. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1992 Apr;72(4):1401-6 [PMID: 1534322]
  5. Acta Neuropathol. 1982;57(4):243-8 [PMID: 7136501]
  6. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1992 Oct;73(4):1578-83 [PMID: 1447107]
  7. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1999 Sep;80(4):373-8 [PMID: 10483809]
  8. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1992 May;24(5):512-20 [PMID: 1569847]
  9. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1989;59(4):310-9 [PMID: 2583179]
  10. Muscle Nerve. 1993 Jan;16(1):99-108 [PMID: 8423838]
  11. Invest Radiol. 1990 May;25(5):480-5 [PMID: 2345077]
  12. Spinal Cord. 1999 Apr;37(4):251-7 [PMID: 10338344]
  13. Radiology. 1991 Jun;179(3):659-64 [PMID: 2027970]
  14. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991 Apr;156(4):765-8 [PMID: 2003443]
  15. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Dec 1;20(23):2505-12 [PMID: 8610245]
  16. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1988 Jun;20(3):242-8 [PMID: 3386502]
  17. Paraplegia. 1995 Aug;33(8):437-49 [PMID: 7478737]
  18. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1992 Feb;72(2):656-63 [PMID: 1559945]
  19. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1999 Dec;87(6):2311-8 [PMID: 10601183]
  20. J Neurol Sci. 1993 Jun;116(2):207-11 [PMID: 8336167]
  21. Clin J Sport Med. 1997 Jan;7(1):3-10 [PMID: 9117523]
  22. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Aug;56(8):M510-3 [PMID: 11487604]
  23. Magn Reson Med. 1997 May;37(5):676-82 [PMID: 9126941]
  24. Int J Sports Med. 1998 Feb;19(2):98-103 [PMID: 9562217]
  25. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1993 Feb;74(2):532-7 [PMID: 8458767]
  26. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1999 Jan;86(1):350-8 [PMID: 9887150]
  27. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1992 Apr;72(4):1493-8 [PMID: 1534323]
  28. Neurosci Lett. 2000 Dec 22;296(2-3):133-6 [PMID: 11108999]
  29. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2001 Jul;85(1-2):185-90 [PMID: 11513314]
  30. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998 Jan;79(1):58-61 [PMID: 9440419]
  31. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1993 Dec;75(6):2400-5 [PMID: 8125856]
  32. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1994 Sep;77(3):1421-30 [PMID: 7836148]
  33. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1995;384:457-69 [PMID: 8585472]
  34. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1995 Feb;78(2):702-8 [PMID: 7759443]
  35. Magn Reson Med. 1987 May;4(5):487-92 [PMID: 3600254]
  36. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 Aug;77(8):773-7 [PMID: 8702370]
  37. Basic Appl Myol. 1995;5(2):139-45 [PMID: 11539271]
  38. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1999 Sep;80(4):394-6 [PMID: 10483812]
  39. Anat Rec. 1994 Mar;238(3):304-10 [PMID: 8179211]
  40. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2000 Jan;81(1-2):128-31 [PMID: 10552277]
  41. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1994;69(5):408-13 [PMID: 7875137]

Grants

  1. HD 39676/NICHD NIH HHS
  2. HD37439-S1/NICHD NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Chronic Disease
Disease Susceptibility
Electric Stimulation
Electric Stimulation Therapy
Female
Humans
Isometric Contraction
Male
Muscle, Skeletal
Spinal Cord Injuries

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0muscleSCIisometric2sinjurycontractionsmQFsubjectsEMSsetsarea%contraction-inducedgreaterdamageABcontrolspost31relativestimulatedversusP<0spinalcordresultsaffectedsusceptibilityMRIMRimagesdaysteninjuredcm605]torqueCompleteinactivationunloadingskeletalmusclesUnloadingcausesincreasedstudyusedmagneticresonanceimagingtesthypothesisevokequadricepsfemorisable-bodiedtakenpriorimmediatelyelectromyostimulationconsistedfiveon/6minfollowedanotherthreeon/130Averagecross-sectionalCSAareasobtainedquantifyingnumberpixelselevatedT2signalsignificantly[9066405meanSE]lesserabsolute[1644peakreduced66%37%controlrespectivelyThree[25Peakremaineddecreased22%daygroupindicateyearssusceptibledeterminedcomparedalsosupportcontentionelectricallyelicitedsufficientcauseprolongedperiodinactivityLong-termincreases

Similar Articles

Cited By