Heat resistance in liquids of Enterococcus spp., Listeria spp., Escherichia coli, Yersinia enterocolitica, Salmonella spp. and Campylobacter spp.

S Sörqvist
Author Information
  1. S Sörqvist: Department of Food Hygiene, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden. lmhyg@slu.se

Abstract

The aim of the work was to collect, evaluate, summarize and compare heat resistance data reported for Campylobacter, Enterococcus, Escherichia, Listeria, Salmonella and Yersinia spp. The work was limited to resistance in liquids with pH values 6-8. Results obtained under similar experimental conditions were sought. Thermal destruction lines for the various bacterial groups studied were constructed using log10 D values and treatment temperatures. There was a good linear relationship between log10 D and temperature with Escherichia coli, listerias and salmonellas. For campylobacters, enterococci and yersinias the relationships were weaker but, nevertheless, present. Using the slopes of the lines and their 95% confidence limits, z values and their 95% confidence limits were calculated. z values were compared with z values obtained from reports. The equations for the lines were also used for calculation of predicted means of D values at various treatment temperatures. 95% confidence limits on predicted means of D values and on predicted individual D values were also calculated. Lines and values are shown in figures and tables. Differences in heat resistance noted between and within the bacterial groups studied are discussed.

References

  1. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993 Jun;59(6):1842-7 [PMID: 8328803]
  2. Appl Microbiol. 1972 Feb;23(2):415-20 [PMID: 4552893]
  3. Nature. 1966 Dec 3;212(5066):1060-1 [PMID: 21090498]
  4. J Appl Microbiol. 1998 Feb;84(2):234-9 [PMID: 9633638]
  5. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998 Jun;64(6):2065-71 [PMID: 9603815]
  6. Acta Microbiol Hung. 1991;38(1):3-6 [PMID: 1810108]
  7. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995 Aug;61(8):3161-4 [PMID: 7487046]
  8. J Appl Bacteriol. 1987 Jul;63(1):21-5 [PMID: 3654400]
  9. Appl Microbiol. 1966 Sep;14(5):815-20 [PMID: 5970469]
  10. Appl Microbiol. 1969 Apr;17(4):491-6 [PMID: 4890741]
  11. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990 Oct;56(10):3216-9 [PMID: 2126703]
  12. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993 Apr;59(4):1247-50 [PMID: 8489233]
  13. J Basic Microbiol. 1997;37(4):251-8 [PMID: 9323866]
  14. J Food Prot. 1994 May;57(5):365-368 [PMID: 31121744]
  15. Appl Microbiol. 1970 Mar;19(3):429-33 [PMID: 4909351]
  16. J Food Prot. 1982 Feb;45(3):253-259 [PMID: 30866281]
  17. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1993;64(1):47-55 [PMID: 8274003]
  18. J Food Prot. 1998 Jun;61(6):683-7 [PMID: 9709249]
  19. J Appl Bacteriol. 1987 Dec;63(6):533-7 [PMID: 3126174]
  20. Br Vet J. 1981 Nov;137(6):378-84 [PMID: 7326556]
  21. Can J Microbiol. 1986 Oct;32(10):791-5 [PMID: 3098397]
  22. J Food Prot. 1999 Feb;62(2):112-7 [PMID: 10030627]
  23. Ann Rech Vet. 1989;20(4):493-500 [PMID: 2515785]
  24. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995 Sep;61(9):3268-73 [PMID: 7574637]
  25. J Appl Bacteriol. 1968 Dec;31(4):414-9 [PMID: 4973617]
  26. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993 Sep;59(9):3120-2 [PMID: 8215381]
  27. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990 Feb;56(2):370-6 [PMID: 2106284]
  28. J Dairy Sci. 1971 Nov;54(11):1583-8 [PMID: 4941021]
  29. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996 Aug;62(8):2735-40 [PMID: 8702265]
  30. J Appl Bacteriol. 1989 Nov;67(5):543-9 [PMID: 2592291]
  31. J Food Prot. 1997 Sep;60(9):1128-1131 [PMID: 31207829]
  32. J Food Prot. 1991 Jul;54(7):519-523 [PMID: 31051542]
  33. Poult Sci. 1971 Nov;50(6):1772-6 [PMID: 5003489]
  34. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1996 Apr 15;138(1):49-54 [PMID: 8674969]
  35. J Food Prot. 1998 Sep;61(9):1184-6 [PMID: 9766073]
  36. J Appl Bacteriol. 1990 Oct;69(4):493-7 [PMID: 2292515]
  37. J Appl Bacteriol. 1981 Aug;51(1):27-39 [PMID: 7024235]
  38. J Food Prot. 1994 Aug;57(8):671-673 [PMID: 31121763]
  39. J Food Prot. 1983 Aug;46(8):702-706 [PMID: 30921893]
  40. Epidemiol Infect. 1990 Apr;104(2):237-41 [PMID: 2323357]
  41. J Food Prot. 1985 Sep;48(9):743-745 [PMID: 30939675]
  42. J Food Prot. 1993 Jul;56(7):568-572 [PMID: 31113034]
  43. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998 Feb;64(2):459-64 [PMID: 9464380]
  44. Appl Microbiol. 1968 Jul;16(7):998-1001 [PMID: 5695067]
  45. J Food Prot. 1986 Dec;49(12):994-998 [PMID: 30965455]
  46. Appl Microbiol. 1969 Jan;17(1):78-82 [PMID: 5774764]
  47. J Hyg (Lond). 1982 Jun;88(3):529-33 [PMID: 7086118]
  48. Appl Microbiol. 1961 Sep;9:415-8 [PMID: 13740067]
  49. J Food Prot. 1998 Apr;61(4):395-401 [PMID: 9709200]
  50. J Appl Bacteriol. 1981 Dec;51(3):517-27 [PMID: 6801001]
  51. J Food Prot. 1990 Jan;53(1):9-14 [PMID: 31003316]
  52. J Dairy Sci. 1971 Dec;54(12):1772-9 [PMID: 5002381]
  53. J Food Prot. 1995 Nov;58(11):1211-1214 [PMID: 31137302]
  54. J Food Prot. 1988 Feb;51(2):132-136 [PMID: 30978771]
  55. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988 Feb;54(2):364-70 [PMID: 3128163]
  56. J Food Prot. 1996 Oct;59(10):1023-1030 [PMID: 31195466]
  57. J Food Prot. 1979 May;42(5):410-415 [PMID: 30812273]
  58. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Feb;79(3):860-4 [PMID: 7038687]
  59. J Food Prot. 1987 Jun;50(6):494-501 [PMID: 30965449]
  60. J Dairy Res. 1994 May;61(2):263-70 [PMID: 7914898]
  61. J Food Prot. 1991 Jan;54(1):12-14 [PMID: 31051578]
  62. J Appl Bacteriol. 1985 Jul;59(1):65-71 [PMID: 3928571]
  63. J Bacteriol. 1988 Sep;170(9):3910-4 [PMID: 3045081]
  64. Int J Food Microbiol. 1997 Aug 19;38(1):31-44 [PMID: 9498135]
  65. Lett Appl Microbiol. 1998 Dec;27(6):313-7 [PMID: 9871347]
  66. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1980 Jul;40(1):174-6 [PMID: 7190810]
  67. J Bacteriol. 1957 Jan;73(1):77-84 [PMID: 13405864]
  68. Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed. 1999 Jun;202(1):41-50 [PMID: 10418099]
  69. J Appl Microbiol. 1998 May;84(5):903-9 [PMID: 9674145]
  70. J Food Prot. 1999 Sep;62(9):999-1003 [PMID: 10492473]
  71. J Food Prot. 1992 Mar;55(3):171-175 [PMID: 31071837]
  72. J Food Prot. 1986 Jul;49(7):500-503 [PMID: 30959637]
  73. J Bacteriol. 1943 Mar;45(3):265-72 [PMID: 16560631]
  74. J Food Prot. 2001 Mar;64(3):410-29 [PMID: 11252490]
  75. Int J Food Microbiol. 1988 Dec 31;7(4):277-86 [PMID: 3152805]
  76. J Food Prot. 1987 Feb;50(2):95-96 [PMID: 30965404]
  77. J Gen Microbiol. 1953 Feb;8(1):27-37 [PMID: 13035028]
  78. J Food Prot. 1992 Aug;55(8):579-582 [PMID: 31071888]
  79. Appl Microbiol. 1968 Nov;16(11):1764-9 [PMID: 4973066]
  80. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 Dec;52(6):1398-402 [PMID: 3098172]
  81. J Food Prot. 1996 Apr;59(4):360-364 [PMID: 31158987]
  82. Lett Appl Microbiol. 1996 Feb;22(2):121-4 [PMID: 8936371]
  83. J Dairy Sci. 1970 Dec;53(12):1659-65 [PMID: 4992509]
  84. J Appl Bacteriol. 1994 Dec;77(6):702-8 [PMID: 7822230]
  85. J Appl Bacteriol. 1974 Mar;37(1):31-43 [PMID: 4603072]
  86. J Food Prot. 1996 Feb;59(2):121-126 [PMID: 31158999]
  87. J Food Prot. 1992 Apr;55(4):234-237 [PMID: 31071786]
  88. Symp Ser Soc Appl Microbiol. 2000;(29):79S-89S [PMID: 10880182]
  89. Appl Microbiol. 1966 May;14(3):416-20 [PMID: 5339362]
  90. J Food Prot. 1995 Apr;58(4):357-360 [PMID: 31137359]
  91. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Aug;44(2):517-9 [PMID: 7125662]
  92. J Food Prot. 1996 Mar;59(3):230-7 [PMID: 10463438]
  93. J Food Prot. 1995 Sep;58(9):960-966 [PMID: 31137409]
  94. Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig. 1970;215(2):173-81 [PMID: 4922306]
  95. J Appl Bacteriol. 1973 Sep;36(3):365-76 [PMID: 4584919]
  96. J Food Prot. 1995 Jan;58(1):49-53 [PMID: 31121772]
  97. Can J Microbiol. 1991 Aug;37(8):609-12 [PMID: 1954573]
  98. J Food Prot. 1997 Jun;60(6):634-638 [PMID: 31195554]
  99. J Appl Bacteriol. 1990 Sep;69(3):373-83 [PMID: 2246142]
  100. J Hosp Infect. 1995 Jul;30(3):193-9 [PMID: 8522775]
  101. J Food Prot. 1996 May;59(5):465-471 [PMID: 31159070]
  102. J Gen Microbiol. 1978 Jul;107(1):37-44 [PMID: 366074]
  103. J Food Prot. 2000 Jun;63(6):779-95 [PMID: 10852574]
  104. Appl Microbiol. 1969 Sep;18(3):318-22 [PMID: 4984763]
  105. J Food Prot. 1988 Nov;51(11):895-897 [PMID: 30991487]
  106. J Food Prot. 1996 Nov;59(11):1182-1186 [PMID: 31195451]
  107. J Appl Bacteriol. 1996 Feb;80(2):216-24 [PMID: 8642016]
  108. J Appl Bacteriol. 1970 Sep;33(3):515-22 [PMID: 5491626]
  109. J Food Prot. 1987 Jul;50(7):543-544 [PMID: 30965488]
  110. J Food Prot. 1987 Jan;50(1):14-17 [PMID: 30965528]
  111. Br Poult Sci. 1968 Jul;9(3):253-60 [PMID: 5673554]
  112. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992 Jun;58(6):2096-8 [PMID: 1622288]
  113. J Food Prot. 1992 Oct;55(10):803-805 [PMID: 31084165]
  114. Lett Appl Microbiol. 1998 Apr;26(4):325-30 [PMID: 9633099]
  115. J Food Prot. 1990 Nov;53(11):924-927 [PMID: 31022792]
  116. J Gen Microbiol. 1981 Feb;122(2):357-61 [PMID: 7033451]
  117. Int J Food Microbiol. 1999 Mar 1;47(1-2):59-66 [PMID: 10357274]
  118. J Appl Bacteriol. 1986 Nov;61(5):389-93 [PMID: 3542923]
  119. J Food Prot. 1981 Aug;44(8):596-601 [PMID: 30836532]
  120. J Dairy Sci. 1988 Dec;71(12):3230-6 [PMID: 3069886]
  121. J Bacteriol. 1938 Jul;36(1):83-98 [PMID: 16560145]
  122. Appl Microbiol. 1971 Mar;21(3):476-81 [PMID: 4928602]
  123. J Gen Microbiol. 1991 Jun;137(6):1419-24 [PMID: 1919516]
  124. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Jul;44(1):88-92 [PMID: 6812501]
  125. J Appl Bacteriol. 1993 Apr;74(4):428-32 [PMID: 8486551]

MeSH Term

Bacteria
Confidence Intervals
Hot Temperature
Hydrogen-Ion Concentration

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0valuessppDresistanceEscherichialines95%confidencelimitszpredictedworkheatCampylobacterEnterococcusListeriaSalmonellaYersinialiquidsobtainedvariousbacterialgroupsstudiedlog10treatmenttemperaturescolicalculatedalsomeansaimcollectevaluatesummarizecomparedatareportedlimitedpH6-8ResultssimilarexperimentalconditionssoughtThermaldestructionconstructedusinggoodlinearrelationshiptemperaturelisteriassalmonellascampylobactersenterococciyersiniasrelationshipsweakerneverthelesspresentUsingslopescomparedreportsequationsusedcalculationindividualLinesshownfigurestablesDifferencesnotedwithindiscussedHeatenterocolitica

Similar Articles

Cited By (19)