Heterogeneity within the Asian American community.

Georgia Robins Sadler, Lisa Ryujin, Tammy Nguyen, Gia Oh, Grace Paik, Brenda Kustin
Author Information
  1. Georgia Robins Sadler: Moores University of California San Diego Cancer Center, La Jolla, California 92093-0658, USA. gsadler@ucsd.edu

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Educational interventions are grounded on scientific data and assumptions about the community to be served. While the Pan Asian community is composed of multiple, ethnic subgroups, it is often treated as a single group for which one health promotion program will be applicable for all of its cultural subgroups. Compounding this stereotypical view of the Pan Asian community, there is sparse data about the cultural subgroups' similarities and dissimilarities. The Asian Grocery Store based cancer education program evaluation data provided an opportunity to compare data collected under identical circumstances from members of six Asian American cultural groups. METHODS: A convenience sample of 1,202 Asian American women evaluated the cultural alignment of a cancer education program, completing baseline and follow-up surveys that included questions about their breast cancer knowledge, attitudes, and screening behaviors. Participants took part in a brief education program that facilitated adherence to recommended screening guidelines. RESULTS: Unique recruitment methods were needed to attract participants from each ethnic group. Impressions gained from the aggregate data revealed different insights than the disaggregate data. Statistically significant variations existed among the subgroups' breast cancer knowledge, attitudes, and screening behaviors that could contribute to health disparities among the subgroups and within the aggregate Pan Asian community. CONCLUSION: Health promotion efforts of providers, educators, and policy makers can be enhanced if cultural differences are identified and taken into account when developing strategies to reduce health disparities and promote health equity.

References

  1. Am J Health Promot. 2001 Mar-Apr;15(4):211-4, ii [PMID: 11349339]
  2. BMC Public Health. 2001;1:7 [PMID: 11553321]
  3. Asian Am Pac Isl J Health. 1998 Summer;6(2):383-399 [PMID: 11567466]
  4. CA Cancer J Clin. 2003 May-Jun;53(3):141-69 [PMID: 12809408]
  5. Prev Med. 1996 Mar-Apr;25(2):126-34 [PMID: 8860277]
  6. Cancer. 2002 Feb 15;94(4):1175-82 [PMID: 11920489]
  7. Prev Med. 1998 Jan-Feb;27(1):144-51 [PMID: 9465365]
  8. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2003 May-Jun;16(3):233-41 [PMID: 12755251]
  9. Res Nurs Health. 2001 Dec;24(6):494-505 [PMID: 11746078]
  10. Health Care Women Int. 2003 Jan;24(1):18-26 [PMID: 12746028]
  11. Am J Prev Med. 1998 Apr;14(3):224-8 [PMID: 9569224]
  12. Mayo Clin Proc. 1996 May;71(5):437-44 [PMID: 8628022]
  13. Health Educ Behav. 1999 Oct;26(5):689-702 [PMID: 10533173]
  14. J Fam Pract. 1997 Sep;45(3):243-9 [PMID: 9300004]
  15. Am J Health Promot. 1995 Mar-Apr;9(4):261-8 [PMID: 10150729]
  16. Am J Prev Med. 2000 Jan;18(1):1-10 [PMID: 10808977]
  17. Ethn Dis. 1998 Autumn;8(3):377-84 [PMID: 9926908]
  18. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1997;(22):79-86 [PMID: 9709281]
  19. Wis Med J. 1995;94(6):305-6 [PMID: 7625089]
  20. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002 Oct 2;94(19):1420-1 [PMID: 12359843]
  21. Med Care. 2002 Sep;40(9):743-51 [PMID: 12218765]
  22. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2002 Oct;29(9):1341-7 [PMID: 12370704]
  23. J Clin Ethics. 1998 Summer;9(2):132-46 [PMID: 9750985]
  24. Public Health Nurs. 2001 Sep-Oct;18(5):357-63 [PMID: 11559419]
  25. J Cancer Educ. 2000 Fall;15(3):173-7 [PMID: 11019767]
  26. Prev Med. 1999 Nov;29(5):374-82 [PMID: 10564629]
  27. J Cult Divers. 2001 Summer;8(2):41-4 [PMID: 11855048]
  28. Int J Epidemiol. 2001 Oct;30(5):976-82 [PMID: 11689507]
  29. Am J Manag Care. 2001 Sep;7(9):887-94 [PMID: 11570022]
  30. Prev Med. 1999 Apr;28(4):386-94 [PMID: 10090868]
  31. Womens Health Issues. 1996 Mar-Apr;6(2):65-73 [PMID: 8932459]
  32. Prev Med. 1999 Sep;29(3):202-9 [PMID: 10479608]
  33. Prev Med. 2000 Nov;31(5):575-83 [PMID: 11071839]
  34. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2000 Sep;9(7):791-801 [PMID: 11025871]
  35. BMC Public Health. 2003 Aug 15;3:27 [PMID: 12921541]
  36. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Feb 2;92 (3):233-42 [PMID: 10655440]
  37. Cancer Nurs. 1997 Feb;20(1):49-61 [PMID: 9033150]
  38. Womens Health Issues. 2000 Jan-Feb;10(1):20-6 [PMID: 10697465]
  39. Med Health R I. 1996 Nov;79(11):388-91 [PMID: 9136549]
  40. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1973 Nov;51(5):1479-83 [PMID: 4762931]
  41. Ir J Med Sci. 1999 Jan-Mar;168(1):29-32 [PMID: 10098340]
  42. Cancer. 2000 Aug 1;89(3):696-705 [PMID: 10931471]
  43. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2000 Oct;27(9 Suppl):62-3 [PMID: 11058984]
  44. Cancer. 1992 Apr 1;69(7 Suppl):1985-91 [PMID: 1544104]
  45. J Cult Divers. 2001 Winter;8(4):109-21 [PMID: 11908075]
  46. Am J Epidemiol. 2001 Feb 15;153(4):372-80 [PMID: 11207155]
  47. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997 Mar 5;89(5):355-65 [PMID: 9060957]

Grants

  1. R25 CA065745/NCI NIH HHS
  2. U01 CA086073/NCI NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0AsiandatacommunityculturalhealthprogramcancerPansubgroupseducationAmericanscreeningethnicgrouppromotionsubgroups'breastknowledgeattitudesbehaviorsaggregateamongdisparitieswithinBACKGROUND:EducationalinterventionsgroundedscientificassumptionsservedcomposedmultipleoftentreatedsingleonewillapplicableCompoundingstereotypicalviewsparsesimilaritiesdissimilaritiesGroceryStorebasedevaluationprovidedopportunitycomparecollectedidenticalcircumstancesmemberssixgroupsMETHODS:conveniencesample1202womenevaluatedalignmentcompletingbaselinefollow-upsurveysincludedquestionsParticipantstookpartbrieffacilitatedadherencerecommendedguidelinesRESULTS:UniquerecruitmentmethodsneededattractparticipantsImpressionsgainedrevealeddifferentinsightsdisaggregateStatisticallysignificantvariationsexistedcontributeCONCLUSION:HealtheffortsproviderseducatorspolicymakerscanenhanceddifferencesidentifiedtakenaccountdevelopingstrategiesreducepromoteequityHeterogeneity

Similar Articles

Cited By