Income inequality and infant mortality in New York City.

Nancy L Sohler, Peter S Arno, Chee Jen Chang, Jing Fang, Clyde Schechter
Author Information
  1. Nancy L Sohler: Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Bronx, New York, USA. nsohler@montefiore.org

Abstract

A series of studies have demonstrated that people who live in regions where there are disparities in income have poorer average health status than people who live in more economically homogeneous regions. To test whether such disparities might explain health variations within urban areas, we examined the possible association between income inequality and infant mortality for zip code regions within New York City using data from the 1990 census and the New York City Department of Health. Both infant mortality and income inequality (percentage of income received by the poorest 50% of households) varied widely across these regions (range in infant mortality: 0.6-29.6/1,000 live births; range in income inequality: 12.7-27.3). An increase of one standard deviation in income inequality was associated with an increase of 0.80 deaths/1,000 live births (P <.001), controlling for other socioeconomic factors. This finding has important implications for public health practice and social epidemiological research in large urban areas, which face significant disparities both in health and in social and economic conditions.

References

  1. BMJ. 1998 Oct 3;317(7163):917-21 [PMID: 9756809]
  2. BMJ. 2002 Jan 5;324(7328):20-3 [PMID: 11777799]
  3. Pediatrics. 1998 Apr;101(4 Pt 1):682-8 [PMID: 9521956]
  4. Am J Public Health. 2002 Mar;92(3):395-8 [PMID: 11867318]
  5. BMJ. 1996 Apr 20;312(7037):1004-7 [PMID: 8616345]
  6. Popul Stud (Camb). 1982 Nov;36(3):441-58 [PMID: 11630829]
  7. Soc Sci Med. 2002 Jan;54(1):65-77 [PMID: 11820682]
  8. Am J Epidemiol. 2002 Sep 1;156(5):471-82 [PMID: 12196317]
  9. Int J Epidemiol. 2002 Jun;31(3):533-8 [PMID: 12055146]
  10. J Asthma. 1999 May;36(3):239-51 [PMID: 10350220]
  11. Int J Epidemiol. 2002 Jun;31(3):549-51 [PMID: 12055150]
  12. Sociol Focus. 1992 Oct;25(4):295-309 [PMID: 12318543]
  13. Milbank Q. 1998;76(3):315-39, 303-4 [PMID: 9738166]
  14. BMJ. 1996 Apr 20;312(7037):999-1003 [PMID: 8616393]
  15. BMJ. 2002 Apr 20;324(7343):978 [PMID: 11964356]
  16. Soc Sci Med. 2000 Mar;50(5):673-87 [PMID: 10658848]
  17. N Engl J Med. 1993 Jul 8;329(2):103-9 [PMID: 8510686]
  18. BMJ. 2000 Apr 1;320(7239):898-902 [PMID: 10741994]
  19. BMJ. 1997 Jun 14;314(7096):1727-8 [PMID: 9202502]
  20. J Health Soc Behav. 2001 Dec;42(4):373-87 [PMID: 11831138]
  21. BMJ. 1997 Jun 14;314(7096):1724-7 [PMID: 9185498]
  22. Am J Epidemiol. 1989 May;129(5):919-33 [PMID: 2705434]
  23. Soc Sci Med. 2003 Mar;56(6):1139-53 [PMID: 12600354]
  24. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2001 Jun;26(3):523-32 [PMID: 11430249]
  25. Soc Sci Med. 1999 Mar;48(6):733-44 [PMID: 10190636]
  26. Pak Dev Rev. 1999 Spring;38(1):85-118 [PMID: 12349718]
  27. BMJ. 2002 Jan 5;324(7328):1-2 [PMID: 11777781]
  28. BMJ. 1992 Jan 18;304(6820):165-8 [PMID: 1637372]
  29. Am J Public Health. 2002 Jul;92(7):1100-2 [PMID: 12084688]
  30. Milbank Q. 1998;76(3):341-73, 304 [PMID: 9738167]
  31. Am J Public Health. 1998 May;88(5):816-20 [PMID: 9585755]
  32. Demography. 1989 May;26(2):345-51 [PMID: 2731627]
  33. J Public Health Med. 1999 Jun;21(2):205-7 [PMID: 10432251]
  34. Health Serv Res. 1999 Apr;34(1 Pt 2):215-27 [PMID: 10199670]
  35. Am J Public Health. 1998 Jul;88(7):1074-80 [PMID: 9663157]
  36. Soc Sci Med. 2002 Dec;55(12):2083-92 [PMID: 12409122]
  37. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2001 Jun;26(3):487-522 [PMID: 11430248]

MeSH Term

Censuses
Humans
Income
Infant
Infant Mortality
Infant, Newborn
Multivariate Analysis
New York City
Socioeconomic Factors

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0incomeliveregionshealthinequalityinfantdisparitiesmortalityNewYorkCitypeoplewithinurbanareasrange0000birthsincreasesocialseriesstudiesdemonstratedpooreraveragestatuseconomicallyhomogeneoustestwhethermightexplainvariationsexaminedpossibleassociationzipcodeusingdata1990censusDepartmentHealthpercentagereceivedpoorest50%householdsvariedwidelyacrossmortality:6-296/1inequality:127-273onestandarddeviationassociated80deaths/1P<001controllingsocioeconomicfactorsfindingimportantimplicationspublicpracticeepidemiologicalresearchlargefacesignificanteconomicconditionsIncome

Similar Articles

Cited By (14)