Feature selection for splice site prediction: a new method using EDA-based feature ranking.

Yvan Saeys, Sven Degroeve, Dirk Aeyels, Pierre Rouzé, Yves Van de Peer
Author Information
  1. Yvan Saeys: Department of Plant Systems Biology, Ghent University, Flanders Interuniversity Institute for Biotechnology (VIB), Technologiepark 927, B-9052 Ghent, Belgium. yvan.saeys@psb.ugent.be

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The identification of relevant biological features in large and complex datasets is an important step towards gaining insight in the processes underlying the data. Other advantages of feature selection include the ability of the classification system to attain good or even better solutions using a restricted subset of features, and a faster classification. Thus, robust methods for fast feature selection are of key importance in extracting knowledge from complex biological data.
RESULTS: In this paper we present a novel method for feature subset selection applied to splice site prediction, based on estimation of distribution algorithms, a more general framework of genetic algorithms. From the estimated distribution of the algorithm, a feature ranking is derived. Afterwards this ranking is used to iteratively discard features. We apply this technique to the problem of splice site prediction, and show how it can be used to gain insight into the underlying biological process of splicing.
CONCLUSION: We show that this technique proves to be more robust than the traditional use of estimation of distribution algorithms for feature selection: instead of returning a single best subset of features (as they normally do) this method provides a dynamical view of the feature selection process, like the traditional sequential wrapper methods. However, the method is faster than the traditional techniques, and scales better to datasets described by a large number of features.

References

  1. J Comput Biol. 2004;11(2-3):377-94 [PMID: 15285897]
  2. Trends Plant Sci. 2000 Apr;5(4):160-7 [PMID: 10740297]
  3. Nat Rev Genet. 2002 Sep;3(9):698-709 [PMID: 12209144]
  4. Bioinformatics. 2002;18 Suppl 2:S75-83 [PMID: 12385987]
  5. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Aug;13(8):4939-52 [PMID: 8336728]
  6. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002 Oct 1;30(19):4103-17 [PMID: 12364589]
  7. Genome Res. 2003 Dec;13(12):2637-50 [PMID: 14656968]
  8. Evol Comput. 1997 Fall;5(3):303-46 [PMID: 10021762]
  9. Bioinformatics. 2003 Oct;19 Suppl 2:ii179-88 [PMID: 14534188]
  10. Annu Rev Genet. 2002;36:333-60 [PMID: 12429696]

MeSH Term

Adenosine
Algorithms
Arabidopsis
Base Composition
Chromosomes, Plant
Computational Biology
Databases, Genetic
Guanine
Predictive Value of Tests
RNA Splice Sites
RNA, Plant
Software
Software Validation

Chemicals

RNA Splice Sites
RNA, Plant
Guanine
Adenosine

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0featurefeaturesselectionmethodbiologicalsubsetsplicesitedistributionalgorithmsrankingtraditionallargecomplexdatasetsinsightunderlyingdataclassificationbetterusingfasterrobustmethodspredictionestimationusedtechniqueshowprocessBACKGROUND:identificationrelevantimportantsteptowardsgainingprocessesadvantagesincludeabilitysystemattaingoodevensolutionsrestrictedThusfastkeyimportanceextractingknowledgeRESULTS:paperpresentnovelappliedbasedgeneralframeworkgeneticestimatedalgorithmderivedAfterwardsiterativelydiscardapplyproblemcangainsplicingCONCLUSION:provesuseselection:insteadreturningsinglebestnormallyprovidesdynamicalviewlikesequentialwrapperHowevertechniquesscalesdescribednumberFeatureprediction:newEDA-based

Similar Articles

Cited By