Catching audiovisual mice: predicting the arrival time of auditory-visual motion signals.

M Hofbauer, S M Wuerger, G F Meyer, F Roehrbein, K Schill, C Zetzsche
Author Information
  1. M Hofbauer: Neurological Clinic, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany. mhofbauer@nefo.med.uni-muenchen.de

Abstract

We investigated the extent to which auditory and visual motion signals are combined when observers are asked to predict the location of a virtually moving target. In Condition 1, the unimodal and bimodal signals were noisy, but the target object was continuously visible and audible; in Condition 2, the virtually moving object was hidden (invisible and inaudible) for a short period prior to its arrival at the target location. Our main finding was that the facilitation due to simultaneous visual and auditory input is very different for the two conditions. When the target is continuously visible and audible (Condition 1), the bimodal performance is twice as good as the unimodal performances, thus suggesting a very effective integration mechanism. On the other hand, if the object is hidden for a short period (Condition 2) and the task therefore requires the extrapolation of motion speed over a temporal and spatial period, the facilitation due to both sensory inputs is almost absent, and the bimodal performance is limited by the visual performance.

References

  1. J Neurosci. 1996 Dec 15;16(24):8193-207 [PMID: 8987844]
  2. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 May;16(3):468-78 [PMID: 12706226]
  3. Percept Psychophys. 1983 Aug;34(2):161-8 [PMID: 6634374]
  4. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Jul;17(2):447-53 [PMID: 12880914]
  5. Int J Psychophysiol. 2003 Oct;50(1-2):117-24 [PMID: 14511840]
  6. Trans N Y Acad Sci. 1962 Mar;24:574-90 [PMID: 14489538]
  7. Exp Brain Res. 1998 Nov;123(1-2):124-35 [PMID: 9835401]
  8. Neuroscientist. 2002 Aug;8(4):306-14 [PMID: 12194499]
  9. Behav Brain Res. 2001 Jun;121(1-2):69-79 [PMID: 11275285]
  10. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Jun;17(1):154-63 [PMID: 12763201]
  11. Percept Psychophys. 2003 Nov;65(8):1188-96 [PMID: 14710954]
  12. Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(13):1847-62 [PMID: 14527547]
  13. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2002 Jun;14(1):139-46 [PMID: 12063137]
  14. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994 Feb;20(1):131-53 [PMID: 8133219]
  15. Brain Res Bull. 1998 Jun;46(3):211-24 [PMID: 9667814]
  16. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2002 Jun;14(1):115-28 [PMID: 12063135]
  17. J Neurophysiol. 1994 Jan;71(1):429-32 [PMID: 8158240]
  18. Neuroreport. 2001 Aug 8;12(11):2557-60 [PMID: 11496148]
  19. Brain Res. 1988 May 17;448(2):355-8 [PMID: 3378157]
  20. Prog Brain Res. 1996;112:289-99 [PMID: 8979836]
  21. Nature. 1997 Mar 6;386(6620):19, 21 [PMID: 9052774]
  22. Neuron. 2001 Jan;29(1):287-96 [PMID: 11182099]
  23. Nature. 1997 Jan 23;385(6614):308 [PMID: 9002513]
  24. J Neurophysiol. 2002 Jul;88(1):438-54 [PMID: 12091566]
  25. Percept Psychophys. 1995 Aug;57(6):802-16 [PMID: 7651805]
  26. Percept Psychophys. 2001 Jan;63(1):126-47 [PMID: 11304009]
  27. Exp Brain Res. 2003 Jun;150(4):417-26 [PMID: 12728291]

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Auditory Perception
Female
Fixation, Ocular
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Motion Perception
Signal Detection, Psychological
Space Perception
Time Factors
Visual Perception

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0targetConditionvisualmotionsignalsbimodalobjectperiodperformanceauditorylocationvirtuallymoving1unimodalcontinuouslyvisibleaudible2hiddenshortarrivalfacilitationdueinvestigatedextentcombinedobserversaskedpredictnoisyinvisibleinaudiblepriormainfindingsimultaneousinputdifferenttwoconditionstwicegoodperformancesthussuggestingeffectiveintegrationmechanismhandtaskthereforerequiresextrapolationspeedtemporalspatialsensoryinputsalmostabsentlimitedCatchingaudiovisualmice:predictingtimeauditory-visual

Similar Articles

Cited By