Aqueous humor and serum immunoblotting for immunoglobulin types G, A, M, and E in cases of human ocular toxoplasmosis.

Justus G Garweg, Silvia-Daniela L Garweg, Franziska Flueckiger, Patrick Jacquier, Matthias Boehnke
Author Information
  1. Justus G Garweg: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland. justus.garweg@insel.ch

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the local and systemic Toxoplasma-specific humoral immune responses in individuals with ocular toxoplasmosis (OT). To this end, paired aqueous humor and serum samples from 46 individuals with active OT and from 30 individuals without inflammatory eye disease (controls) were analyzed by immunoblotting for anti-Toxoplasma immunoglobulin G (IgG), IgA, IgM, and IgE directed against 20- to 120-kDa antigens. The presence in the aqueous humor of a unique band, or of at least three bands that were at least three times more intense in aqueous humor than in serum, was taken as evidence of local antibody production. IgG bands were detected in 98% of the aqueous humor samples, while IgA bands were detected in 76%, IgM bands were detected in 8%, and IgE bands were not detected in any. Evidence of local production of specific antibodies was found in 32 cases (70%) (IgG in 23 [50%]; IgA in 16 [35%]). In 10 instances (22%), routine laboratory tests were not indicative of OT. In 14 cases (30%), no local antibody production was detected by immunoblotting; 3 of these cases yielded evidence of local antibody production according to the Goldmann-Witmer coefficient. Local antibody production was revealed for 7 of the 30 controls (23%). Hence, the sensitivity of immunoblotting for IgG and IgA is 70%, and the specificity is 77%. We conclude that immunoblotting for local specific IgG and IgA supports the clinical diagnosis of OT in 70% of cases. In 22% of these, the diagnosis is not confirmed by other laboratory tests. Hence, immunoblotting increases the sensitivity of routine laboratory tests and should be considered for samples that register negative by such tests.

References

  1. Doc Ophthalmol. 1990 Oct;75(3-4):225-31 [PMID: 2090396]
  2. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989 Jun 15;107(6):632-41 [PMID: 2729411]
  3. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Apr;33(4):878-84 [PMID: 7790453]
  4. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000 Aug;41(9):2584-90 [PMID: 10937570]
  5. Clin Infect Dis. 1996 Aug;23(2):277-82 [PMID: 8842263]
  6. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998 Sep;82(9):1017-21 [PMID: 9893591]
  7. J Oral Pathol Med. 1997 Apr;26(4):187-91 [PMID: 9176794]
  8. Mol Pathol. 2000 Jun;53(3):155-8 [PMID: 10897336]
  9. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002 Apr;133(4):506-15 [PMID: 11931784]
  10. J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Mar;38(3):996-1001 [PMID: 10698986]
  11. J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Dec;24(6):1050-4 [PMID: 3536997]
  12. Doc Ophthalmol. 1997;94(1-2):25-37 [PMID: 9657289]
  13. J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Jun;34(6):1506-11 [PMID: 8735107]
  14. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2000 Jan-Feb;95(1):89-94 [PMID: 10656711]
  15. Ophthalmology. 2002 May;109(5):869-78 [PMID: 11986090]
  16. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998 Nov;126(5):698-706 [PMID: 9822234]
  17. J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Nov;37(11):3465-8 [PMID: 10523535]
  18. Int Ophthalmol. 1989 Dec;13(6):383-6 [PMID: 2697703]
  19. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1980 Nov;29(6):1181-6 [PMID: 7446809]
  20. Pathol Biol (Paris). 1995 Nov;43(9):772-8 [PMID: 8746099]
  21. Curr Eye Res. 1990 Dec;9(12):1177-83 [PMID: 2091897]
  22. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1989 Apr;67(2):164-8 [PMID: 2658460]
  23. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1990 Oct;31(10):2129-35 [PMID: 2211009]
  24. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999 Oct;128(4):407-12 [PMID: 10577580]
  25. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999 Mar;127(3):294-300 [PMID: 10088739]
  26. J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Nov;37(11):3487-90 [PMID: 10523539]
  27. Arch Ophthalmol. 1984 May;102(5):697-8 [PMID: 6721755]
  28. Int Ophthalmol. 1992 Mar;16(2):75-80 [PMID: 1587698]
  29. J Egypt Soc Parasitol. 1999;29(3):735-43 [PMID: 12561914]
  30. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1995 Spring;35(2):15-29 [PMID: 7490177]
  31. J Clin Immunol. 1999 Jul;19(4):215-22 [PMID: 10471975]
  32. Parasite Immunol. 1994 Jan;16(1):43-50 [PMID: 8152833]
  33. J Clin Pathol. 1995 Oct;48(10):908-11 [PMID: 8537487]
  34. J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Aug;41(8):3537-41 [PMID: 12904352]
  35. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2003 Jan-Feb;13(1):74-9 [PMID: 12635678]
  36. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001 Dec;42(13):3228-32 [PMID: 11726627]
  37. Parasitol Today. 1993 Oct;9(10):361-4 [PMID: 15463669]
  38. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1989;227(5):489-93 [PMID: 2806935]

MeSH Term

Animals
Antibodies, Protozoan
Antibody Specificity
Aqueous Humor
Humans
Immunoblotting
Immunoglobulins
Toxoplasma
Toxoplasmosis, Ocular

Chemicals

Antibodies, Protozoan
Immunoglobulins

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0localimmunoblottinghumorIgGIgAbandsproductiondetectedcasesOTaqueousantibodytestsindividualsserumsamples70%laboratoryoculartoxoplasmosis30controlsimmunoglobulinGIgMIgEleastthreeevidencespecific22%routineHencesensitivitydiagnosispurposestudycomparesystemicToxoplasma-specifichumoralimmuneresponsesendpaired46activewithoutinflammatoryeyediseaseanalyzedanti-Toxoplasmadirected20-120-kDaantigenspresenceuniquebandtimesintensetaken98%76%8%Evidenceantibodiesfound3223[50%]16[35%]10instancesindicative1430%3yieldedaccordingGoldmann-WitmercoefficientLocalrevealed723%specificity77%concludesupportsclinicalconfirmedincreasesconsideredregisternegativeAqueoustypesMEhuman

Similar Articles

Cited By