The social/sexual environment of gay men residing in a rural frontier state: implications for the development of HIV prevention programs.

Mark L Williams, Anne M Bowen, Keith J Horvath
Author Information
  1. Mark L Williams: Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX 77030, USA. mwilliams@sph.uth.tmc.edu

Abstract

CONTEXT: The incidence and prevalence of HIV/AIDS is increasing among rural men who have sex with men (MSM). Yet little is known about the social/ sexual environment of rural frontier areas.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the social/sexual environment of gay men living in rural areas and how this environment contributes to the development of HIV/AIDS prevention programs.
METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted in Wyoming. In-depth guided interviews were conducted with 39 self-identified gay men. Data were analyzed for emergent themes using constant comparative analysis.
FINDINGS: Four broadly related themes emerged. Participants perceive that they live in a hostile social environment in which the potential for becoming a target of violence is present. In order to cope with this social reality, men adopt strategies to assimilate into the predominant heterosexual culture and to look for sex partners. These, in turn, are related to their attitudes about HIV/AIDS and prevention activities. Notably, the Internet was discussed by participants as a means for men to connect to a larger gay society and look for sex partners and as a potential venue to HIV/AIDS prevention programs.
CONCLUSIONS: Data provided a number of implications for developing HIV/AIDS prevention programs targeting rural MSM. Especially apparent was the need for programs to be mindful of the desire to keep one's sexual preferences shielded from public knowledge and the effect this may have on recruiting rural MSM to participate in prevention activities. The Internet, because men can access it privately, might provide a venue for prevention projects.

References

  1. J Rural Health. 2000 Winter;16(1):11-9 [PMID: 10916311]
  2. J Rural Health. 2000 Winter;16(1):20-30 [PMID: 10916312]
  3. Am J Public Health. 2001 Jul;91(7):1060-8 [PMID: 11441732]
  4. J Rural Health. 1999 Summer;15(3):335-43 [PMID: 11942566]
  5. AIDS Care. 2002 Aug;14(4):539-44 [PMID: 12204155]
  6. J Infect Dis. 1989 Dec;160(6):1051-5 [PMID: 2584752]
  7. Soc Work. 1991 Jan;36(1):13-8 [PMID: 1998123]
  8. J Homosex. 1997;33(1):51-67 [PMID: 9205928]
  9. AIDS. 1997 Nov;11(13):1641-6 [PMID: 9365770]
  10. J Rural Health. 1997 Summer;13(3):237-9 [PMID: 10174614]
  11. J Rural Health. 1998 Spring;14(2):138-45 [PMID: 9715002]

Grants

  1. R01 MH063667/NIMH NIH HHS
  2. R01 MH063667-01/NIMH NIH HHS
  3. MH63667/NIMH NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Aged
Attitude to Health
HIV Infections
Homosexuality, Male
Humans
Interpersonal Relations
Male
Middle Aged
Risk-Taking
Rural Health
Sexual Partners
Social Behavior
Social Environment
Social Isolation
Surveys and Questionnaires
Wyoming

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0menpreventionruralHIV/AIDSenvironmentprogramsgaysexMSMsexualfrontierareasstudysocial/sexualdevelopmentconductedDatathemesrelatedsocialpotentiallookpartnersactivitiesInternetvenueimplicationsCONTEXT:incidenceprevalenceincreasingamongYetlittleknownsocial/PURPOSE:purposeassesslivingcontributesMETHODS:qualitativeWyomingIn-depthguidedinterviews39self-identifiedanalyzedemergentusingconstantcomparativeanalysisFINDINGS:FourbroadlyemergedParticipantsperceivelivehostilebecomingtargetviolencepresentordercoperealityadoptstrategiesassimilatepredominantheterosexualcultureturnattitudesNotablydiscussedparticipantsmeansconnectlargersocietyCONCLUSIONS:providednumberdevelopingtargetingEspeciallyapparentneedmindfuldesirekeepone'spreferencesshieldedpublicknowledgeeffectmayrecruitingparticipatecanaccessprivatelymightprovideprojectsresidingstate:HIV

Similar Articles

Cited By