[PACS: storage and retrieval of digital radiological image data].

S Wirth, M Treitl, S Villain, A Lucke, S Nissen-Meyer, I Mittermaier, K-J Pfeifer, M Reiser
Author Information
  1. S Wirth: Institut für Klinische Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität Muenchen. Stefan.Wirth@med.uni-muenchen.de

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Efficient handling of both picture archiving and retrieval is a crucial factor when new PACS installations as well as technical upgrades are planned.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: For a large PACS installation for 200 actual studies, the number, modality,and body region of available priors were evaluated. In addition, image access time of 100 CT studies from hard disk (RAID), magneto-optic disk (MOD), and tape archives (TAPE) were accessed.
RESULTS: For current examinations priors existed in 61.1% with an averaged quantity of 7.7 studies. Thereof 56.3% were within 0-3 months, 84.9% within 12 months, 91.7% within 24 months, and 96.2% within 36 months. On average, access to images from the hard disk cache was more than 100 times faster then from MOD or TAPE.
CONCLUSION: Since only PACS RAID provides online image access, at least current imaging of the past 12 months should be available from cache. An accurate prefetching mechanism facilitates effective use of the expensive online cache area. For that, however, close interaction of PACS, RIS, and KIS is an indispensable prerequisite.

References

  1. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2003;27(2-3):165-74 [PMID: 12620307]
  2. J Digit Imaging. 2001 Jun;14(2):72-82 [PMID: 11440257]
  3. Rofo. 2005 Feb;177(2):250-7 [PMID: 15666234]
  4. Radiologe. 1999 Apr;39(4):304-9 [PMID: 10337701]
  5. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001 May-Jun;8(3):242-53 [PMID: 11320069]
  6. J Digit Imaging. 2000 Aug;13(3):101-8 [PMID: 15359747]
  7. J Digit Imaging. 2001 Jun;14(2 Suppl 1):135-9 [PMID: 11442074]
  8. Radiologe. 2002 May;42(5):376-9 [PMID: 12132125]
  9. J Digit Imaging. 2001 Jun;14(2 Suppl 1):80-3 [PMID: 11442129]
  10. Rofo. 1998 Aug;169(2):99-104 [PMID: 9739357]
  11. Radiologe. 2002 Feb;42(2):119-24 [PMID: 11963246]
  12. Acta Radiol. 1996 Nov;37(6):838-46 [PMID: 8995452]
  13. Rofo. 2003 Jul;175(7):973-80 [PMID: 12847654]
  14. Eur Radiol. 1998;8(9):1707-18 [PMID: 9866792]
  15. J Digit Imaging. 2001 Jun;14(2 Suppl 1):72-6 [PMID: 11442127]
  16. Radiol Manage. 2002 May-Jun;24(3):30-8; quiz 39-41 [PMID: 12080930]
  17. Eur Radiol. 1999;9(6):1152-60 [PMID: 10415255]
  18. Rofo. 2000 Jun;172(6):542-52 [PMID: 10916551]
  19. J Digit Imaging. 2000 May;13(2 Suppl 1):73-5 [PMID: 10847367]
  20. Radiologe. 2002 May;42(5):351-60 [PMID: 12132122]

MeSH Term

Database Management Systems
Databases, Factual
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated
Germany
Information Dissemination
Information Storage and Retrieval
Internet
Medical Records Systems, Computerized
Radiographic Image Enhancement
Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
Radiology Information Systems
Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
Systems Integration
Technology Assessment, Biomedical
User-Computer Interface

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0monthsPACSwithinstudiesimageaccessdiskcacheretrievalavailablepriors100hardRAIDMODTAPEcurrent712onlineBACKGROUND:EfficienthandlingpicturearchivingcrucialfactornewinstallationswelltechnicalupgradesplannedMATERIALSANDMETHODS:largeinstallation200actualnumbermodalitybodyregionevaluatedadditiontimeCTmagneto-optictapearchivesaccessedRESULTS:examinationsexisted611%averagedquantityThereof563%0-3849%917%24962%36averageimagestimesfasterCONCLUSION:SinceprovidesleastimagingpastaccurateprefetchingmechanismfacilitateseffectiveuseexpensiveareahowevercloseinteractionRISKISindispensableprerequisite[PACS:storagedigitalradiologicaldata]

Similar Articles

Cited By