Resistance is costly: trade-offs between immunity, fecundity and survival in the pea aphid.

D M Gwynn, A Callaghan, J Gorham, K F A Walters, M D E Fellowes
Author Information
  1. D M Gwynn: School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, Berkshire RG6 6AJ, UK.

Abstract

Parasitoids are among the most important natural enemies of insects in many environments. Acyrthosiphon pisum, the pea aphid, is a common pest of the leguminous crops in temperate regions. Pea aphids are frequently attacked by a range of endoparasitic wasps, including the common aphidiine, Aphidius ervi. Immunity to parasitoid attack is thought to involve secondary symbiotic bacteria, the presence of which is associated with the death of the parasitoid egg. It has been suggested that there is a fecundity cost of resistance, as individuals carrying the secondary symbionts associated with parasitoid resistance have fewer offspring. Supporting this hypothesis, we find a positive relationship between fecundity and susceptibility to parasitoid attack. There is also a negative relationship between fecundity and off-plant survival time (which positively correlates with resistance to parasitoid attack). Taken together, these results suggest that the aphids can either invest in defence (parasitoid resistance, increased off-plant survival time) or reproduction, and speculate that this may be mediated by changes in the aphids' endosymbiont fauna. Furthermore, there is a positive relationship between aphid size and resistance, suggesting that successful resistance to parasitoid attack may involve physical, as well as physiological, defences.

References

  1. Heredity (Edinb). 2000 Jan;84 ( Pt 1):1-8 [PMID: 10692005]
  2. Evolution. 2001 Sep;55(9):1805-14 [PMID: 11681735]
  3. Bull Entomol Res. 2002 Aug;92(4):351-7 [PMID: 12191444]
  4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Feb 18;100(4):1803-7 [PMID: 12563031]
  5. Parasitology. 2002;125 Suppl:S71-82 [PMID: 12622330]
  6. Science. 2003 Jul 25;301(5632):472-5 [PMID: 12881560]
  7. Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Dec 22;270(1533):2543-50 [PMID: 14728775]
  8. Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Apr 22;271(1541):771-83 [PMID: 15255094]
  9. Am Nat. 2004 Oct;164(4):559-65 [PMID: 15459885]
  10. Trends Ecol Evol. 1996 Aug;11(8):317-21 [PMID: 21237861]
  11. Evolution. 1995 Jun;49(3):427-438 [PMID: 28565087]
  12. Evolution. 1999 Oct;53(5):1435-1445 [PMID: 28565548]
  13. Evolution. 1999 Jun;53(3):966-972 [PMID: 28565619]
  14. Nature. 1997 Sep 18;389(6648):278-80 [PMID: 9305840]
  15. Parasitology. 1998;116 Suppl:S29-45 [PMID: 9695108]
  16. Proc Biol Sci. 1998 Aug 22;265(1405):1553-8 [PMID: 9744107]

MeSH Term

Analysis of Variance
Animals
Aphids
Body Composition
Body Size
England
Fertility
Host-Parasite Interactions
Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique
Survival Analysis
Wasps

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0parasitoidresistanceattackfecundityaphidrelationshipsurvivalpeacommonaphidsinvolvesecondaryassociatedpositiveoff-planttimemayParasitoidsamongimportantnaturalenemiesinsectsmanyenvironmentsAcyrthosiphonpisumpestleguminouscropstemperateregionsPeafrequentlyattackedrangeendoparasiticwaspsincludingaphidiineAphidiuserviImmunitythoughtsymbioticbacteriapresencedeatheggsuggestedcostindividualscarryingsymbiontsfeweroffspringSupportinghypothesisfindsusceptibilityalsonegativepositivelycorrelatesTakentogetherresultssuggestcaneitherinvestdefenceincreasedreproductionspeculatemediatedchangesaphids'endosymbiontfaunaFurthermoresizesuggestingsuccessfulphysicalwellphysiologicaldefencesResistancecostly:trade-offsimmunity

Similar Articles

Cited By (37)