Prediction and validation of total and regional skeletal muscle mass by ultrasound in Japanese adults.

Kiyoshi Sanada, Charles F Kearns, Taishi Midorikawa, Takashi Abe
Author Information
  1. Kiyoshi Sanada: Tokyo Metropolitan University, 1-1 Minami-Ohsawa Hachioji, Tokyo, 192-0397, Japan. sanada@waseda.jp

Abstract

The present study was performed to develop regression-based prediction equations for skeletal muscle (SM) mass by ultrasound and to investigate the validity of these equations in Japanese adults. Seventy-two Japanese men (n=38) and women (n=34) aged 18-61 years participated in this study and were randomly separated into two groups: the model development group (n=48) and the validation group (n=24). The total and regional SM mass were measured using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 1.5 T-scanners with spin-echo sequence. Contiguous transverse images (about 150 slices) with a slice thickness of 1 cm were obtained from the first cervical vertebra to the ankle joints. The volume of SM was calculated from the summation of digitized cross-sectional area. The SM volume was converted into mass units (kg) by an assumed SM density of 1.04 kg l(-1). The muscle thickness (MTH) was measured by B-mode ultrasound (5 MHz scanning head) at nine sites on the anatomical SM belly. Strong correlations were observed between the site-matched SM mass (total, arm, trunk body, thigh, and lower leg) by MRI measurement and the MTH x height (in m) in the model development group (r=0.83-0.96 in men, r=0.53-0.91 in women, P<0.05). When the SM mass prediction equations were applied to the validation group, significant correlations were also observed between the MRI-measured and predicted SM mass (P<0.05). The predicted total SM mass for the validation group was 19.6 (6.5) kg and was not significantly different from the MRI-measured SM mass of 20.2 (6.5) kg. Bland-Altman analysis did not indicate a bias in prediction of the total SM mass for the validation group (r=0.00, NS). These results suggested that ultrasound-derived prediction equations are a valid method to predict SM mass and an alternative to MRI measurement in healthy Japanese adults.

References

  1. Acta Physiol Scand. 2001 Aug;172(4):249-55 [PMID: 11531646]
  2. J Exp Biol. 2000 Mar;203(Pt 5):913-9 [PMID: 10667974]
  3. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Jan;35(1):39-44 [PMID: 12544633]
  4. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1986 Nov;71(3):359-63 [PMID: 3544856]
  5. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10 [PMID: 2868172]
  6. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002 Aug;76(2):378-83 [PMID: 12145010]
  7. Sports Med. 1988 Feb;5(2):74-98 [PMID: 3281209]
  8. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000 Sep;72(3):796-803 [PMID: 10966902]
  9. J Gravit Physiol. 1997 Jan;4(1):S10-4 [PMID: 11541170]
  10. J Neurol Sci. 1998 Jul 15;159(1):60-6 [PMID: 9700705]
  11. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2000 Oct;89(4):1380-6 [PMID: 11007572]
  12. Am J Epidemiol. 1998 Apr 15;147(8):755-63 [PMID: 9554417]
  13. Am J Hum Biol. 1994;6(2):161-170 [PMID: 28548275]
  14. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003 Jan;77(1):76-82 [PMID: 12499326]
  15. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1996 Oct;28(10 ):1311-20 [PMID: 8897390]
  16. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1997 Jul;83(1):229-39 [PMID: 9216968]
  17. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2000 Aug;89(2):465-71 [PMID: 10926627]
  18. Am J Clin Nutr. 1996 Jun;63(6):863-9 [PMID: 8644679]
  19. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2000 Feb;88(2):662-8 [PMID: 10658035]
  20. Br J Sports Med. 2003;37(5):436-40 [PMID: 14514537]
  21. Can J Appl Physiol. 2001 Feb;26(1):102-22 [PMID: 11173672]
  22. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2001 Aug;85(3-4):240-3 [PMID: 11560076]
  23. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004 May;91(5-6):534-7 [PMID: 14735364]
  24. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004 May;79(5):874-80 [PMID: 15113728]
  25. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004 Jan;91(1):116-8 [PMID: 14639480]
  26. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1990 Oct;22(5):729-33 [PMID: 2233214]
  27. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1998 Jul;78(2):109-14 [PMID: 9694308]
  28. Am J Hum Biol. 1992;4(4):511-520 [PMID: 28524394]

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Body Weights and Measures
Female
Humans
Japan
Magnetic Resonance Angiography
Male
Middle Aged
Muscle, Skeletal
Reproducibility of Results
Ultrasonography

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0SMmassgroupvalidationtotalpredictionequationsJapanese5kgmuscleultrasoundadultsMRI1r=06studyskeletalmenwomenmodeldevelopmentregionalmeasuredthicknessvolumeMTHcorrelationsobservedmeasurementP<005MRI-measuredpredictedpresentperformeddevelopregression-basedinvestigatevaliditySeventy-twon=38n=34aged18-61yearsparticipatedrandomlyseparatedtwogroups:n=48n=24usingmagneticresonanceimagingT-scannersspin-echosequenceContiguoustransverseimages150slicesslicecmobtainedfirstcervicalvertebraanklejointscalculatedsummationdigitizedcross-sectionalareaconvertedunitsassumeddensity04l-1B-modeMHzscanningheadninesitesanatomicalbellyStrongsite-matchedarmtrunkbodythighlowerlegxheightm83-09653-091appliedsignificantalso19significantlydifferent202Bland-Altmananalysisindicatebias00NSresultssuggestedultrasound-derivedvalidmethodpredictalternativehealthyPrediction

Similar Articles

Cited By