Stimulus specificity of concurrent recovery in the rabbit nictitating membrane response.

Gabrielle Weidemann, E James Kehoe
Author Information
  1. Gabrielle Weidemann: University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Abstract

Three experiments demonstrated that, following the extinction of an established conditioned stimulus (CS; e.g., tone), the pairing of an orthogonal stimulus from another modality (e.g., light) with the unconditioned stimulus (US) results in strong recovery of responding to the extinguished CS. This recovery occurred to about an equal degree regardless of whether or not initial training contained unambiguous stimulus-reinforcer relationships--that is, consistent CS-US pairings--or some degree of ambiguity, including intramodal discrimination training, partial reinforcement, or even cross-modal discrimination training (tone vs. light). Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrated that this recovery of responding was largely specific to the extinguished CS, but moderate generalization to other stimuli from the same modality did appear. The results are discussed with reference to alternative mechanisms applicable to learning-dependent generalization between otherwise distinct CSs. These models assume that such generalization is mediated by either a shared response, shared reinforcer, shared context, or shared hidden units within a layered neural network. A specific layered network is proposed to explain the present results as well as other types of savings seen previously in conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response.

References

  1. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1998 Jul;24(3):335-51 [PMID: 9679309]
  2. Anim Learn Behav. 2002 May;30(2):96-111 [PMID: 12141139]
  3. Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Jun;1(2):156-81 [PMID: 24203468]
  4. Behav Processes. 2003 Apr 28;62(1-3):5-25 [PMID: 12729966]
  5. Psychol Rev. 1981 Mar;88(2):135-70 [PMID: 7291377]
  6. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1998 Oct;24(4):467-82 [PMID: 9805792]
  7. Annu Rev Psychol. 1997;48:481-514 [PMID: 9046567]
  8. Psychol Rev. 1992 Apr;99(2):268-305 [PMID: 1594726]
  9. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2002 Oct;28(4):388-96 [PMID: 12395496]
  10. Behav Neurosci. 2003 Apr;117(2):292-303 [PMID: 12708526]
  11. Learn Behav. 2004 Nov;32(4):409-26 [PMID: 15825883]
  12. Psychol Rev. 1990 Apr;97(2):285-308 [PMID: 2186426]
  13. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1989 Oct;15(4):338-46 [PMID: 2794870]
  14. Psychol Rev. 1988 Oct;95(4):411-33 [PMID: 3057526]
  15. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1974 Jul;87(1):73-9 [PMID: 4412580]
  16. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1991 Jul;17(3):299-311 [PMID: 1890388]
  17. Hippocampus. 1993 Oct;3(4):491-516 [PMID: 8269040]
  18. Brain Res Bull. 2004 Apr 30;63(3):173-202 [PMID: 15145138]
  19. Q J Exp Psychol B. 1991 May;43(2):121-35 [PMID: 1650489]
  20. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1998 Jan;24(1):3-14 [PMID: 9438962]
  21. Psychol Bull. 1985 Mar;97(2):316-33 [PMID: 3983301]
  22. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1992 Apr;18(2):182-92 [PMID: 1583447]
  23. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2002 Oct;28(4):378-87 [PMID: 12395495]
  24. Learn Behav. 2003 Feb;31(1):49-68 [PMID: 18450069]

MeSH Term

Animals
Behavior, Animal
Conditioning, Psychological
Discrimination Learning
Extinction, Psychological
Female
Nictitating Membrane
Rabbits
Reinforcement, Psychology
Signal Transduction

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0recoverysharedstimulusCSresultstraininggeneralizationresponsedemonstratedegtonemodalitylightrespondingextinguisheddegreediscriminationspecificlayerednetworkrabbitnictitatingmembraneThreeexperimentsfollowingextinctionestablishedconditionedpairingorthogonalanotherunconditionedUSstrongoccurredequalregardlesswhetherinitialcontainedunambiguousstimulus-reinforcerrelationships--thatconsistentCS-USpairings--orambiguityincludingintramodalpartialreinforcementevencross-modalvsExperiments12largelymoderatestimuliappeardiscussedreferencealternativemechanismsapplicablelearning-dependentotherwisedistinctCSsmodelsassumemediatedeitherreinforcercontexthiddenunitswithinneuralproposedexplainpresentwelltypessavingsseenpreviouslyconditioningStimulusspecificityconcurrent

Similar Articles

Cited By (5)