Effect of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on satiety and food likes: the role of genetics.

Richard C Thirlby, Frohar Bahiraei, Jim Randall, Adam Drewnoski
Author Information
  1. Richard C Thirlby: Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 Ninth Avenue, PO Box 900, Seattle, WA 98101-0900, USA. richard.thirlby@vmmc.org

Abstract

Among factors influencing the outcome of bariatric surgery may be genetics and familial risk. The purpose of this study was to assess the etiology of obesity and its impact on hunger, satiety, and food likes in obese patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). This study was based on 76 patients undergoing RYGB procedures performed by a single surgeon. A previously described 100-point obesity risk index (ORI) was used to assess familial obesity risk. Hunger and satiety were assessed using a standardized Visual Analog Scale "Snickers" test, and food preferences for regular vs. low-fat potato chips were measured preoperatively and postoperatively. Patients were stratified preoperatively into high ORI (n = 34) and low ORI (n = 42) groups. Before operation, high-ORI patients preferred high-fat (regular) potato chips to low-fat (baked) potato chips, whereas the low-ORI patients liked both food types equivalently (P < 0.05). After operation (n = 43), both groups showed lower preferences for high-fat potato chips (P < 0.05 for high-ORI group). As anticipated, hunger was dramatically suppressed after RYGB. However, there was more satiety in the high-ORI group (P < 0.05, ANOVA). Most patients undergoing bariatric surgery had a strong familial or genetic component to their disease. RYGB in high-ORI patients was associated with a significant decline in preference of fatty food and a significantly prolonged drop in hunger ratings after a fast and after a standard 282 kcal meal. The success of bariatric surgery may be influenced by the etiology of obesity.

References

  1. Obes Surg. 2002 Feb;12(1):25-9 [PMID: 11868292]
  2. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1981 Oct 24;283(6299):1093-5 [PMID: 6794776]
  3. JAMA. 1999 Jan 20;281(3):278-80 [PMID: 9918485]
  4. Ann Surg. 1982 Oct;196(4):389-99 [PMID: 7125726]
  5. Obes Res. 2000 Jan;8(1):89-117 [PMID: 10678263]
  6. Am J Hum Genet. 1971 Nov;23(6):578-88 [PMID: 5132066]
  7. N Engl J Med. 1997 Aug 7;337(6):396-407 [PMID: 9241130]
  8. Diabetes. 2001 Dec;50(12):2822-30 [PMID: 11723066]
  9. Ann Surg. 1987 Jun;205(6):613-24 [PMID: 3296971]
  10. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1999 Apr;23(4):403-10 [PMID: 10340819]
  11. Br J Surg. 1995 Jun;82(6):732-9 [PMID: 7627499]
  12. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2002 Dec;26 Suppl 4:S8-S10 [PMID: 12457292]
  13. N Engl J Med. 1990 May 24;322(21):1483-7 [PMID: 2336075]
  14. Ann Surg. 1984 May;199(5):555-62 [PMID: 6721605]
  15. Nutr Clin Pract. 2003 Apr;18(2):141-4 [PMID: 16215032]
  16. JAMA. 1993 Aug 25;270(8):967-74 [PMID: 8345648]
  17. Lancet. 2001 Sep 22;358(9286):1006-8 [PMID: 11583771]
  18. J Nutr. 2000 Dec;130(12 ):3068-72 [PMID: 11110871]
  19. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1999 Apr;67(2):177-85 [PMID: 10224727]
  20. N Engl J Med. 2002 May 23;346(21):1623-30 [PMID: 12023994]
  21. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1996 Jun;50(6):401-7 [PMID: 8793423]
  22. N Engl J Med. 2003 May 22;348(21):2138-9 [PMID: 12761372]
  23. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998 Dec;68(6):1157-73 [PMID: 9846842]
  24. J Am Diet Assoc. 1990 Apr;90(4):534-40 [PMID: 2319073]
  25. Obes Res. 2001 Nov;9 Suppl 4:249S-255S [PMID: 11707550]
  26. N Engl J Med. 1986 Jan 23;314(4):193-8 [PMID: 3941707]
  27. Am J Surg. 1996 Jan;171(1):74-9 [PMID: 8554155]
  28. Obes Surg. 2001 Oct;11(5):576-80 [PMID: 11594098]
  29. N Engl J Med. 1990 May 24;322(21):1477-82 [PMID: 2336074]
  30. Nutr Clin Pract. 2003 Apr;18(2):145-55 [PMID: 16215033]
  31. J Chronic Dis. 1960 Apr;11:349-93 [PMID: 13821960]
  32. JAMA. 1986 Jul 4;256(1):51-4 [PMID: 3712713]
  33. J Am Diet Assoc. 1998 Apr;98(4):408-13 [PMID: 9550162]
  34. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000 Aug;24(8):1018-25 [PMID: 10951541]
  35. Obes Res. 1998 Nov;6(6):438-47 [PMID: 9845234]
  36. Obes Res. 2001 Mar;9 Suppl 1:1S-40S [PMID: 11374180]
  37. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003 Apr;88(4):1594-602 [PMID: 12679444]

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Anastomosis, Roux-en-Y
Body Mass Index
Dietary Fats
Eating
Fasting
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Food Preferences
Gastric Bypass
Humans
Hunger
Male
Middle Aged
Obesity
Prospective Studies
Risk Factors
Satiation
Treatment Outcome
Weight Loss

Chemicals

Dietary Fats

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0patientsfoodobesitysatietyRYGBpotatochipshigh-ORIbariatricsurgeryfamilialriskhungerundergoingORIn=P<005maygeneticsstudyassessetiologyRoux-en-Ygastricbypasspreferencesregularlow-fatpreoperativelygroupsoperationhigh-fatgroupAmongfactorsinfluencingoutcomepurposeimpactlikesobesebased76proceduresperformedsinglesurgeonpreviouslydescribed100-pointindexusedHungerassessedusingstandardizedVisualAnalogScale"Snickers"testvsmeasuredpostoperativelyPatientsstratifiedhigh34low42preferredbakedwhereaslow-ORIlikedtypesequivalently43showedloweranticipateddramaticallysuppressedHoweverANOVAstronggeneticcomponentdiseaseassociatedsignificantdeclinepreferencefattysignificantlyprolongeddropratingsfaststandard282kcalmealsuccessinfluencedEffectlikes:role

Similar Articles

Cited By