Detection of motion onset and offset: reaction time and visual evoked potential analysis.

Kairi Kreegipuu, Jüri Allik
Author Information
  1. Kairi Kreegipuu: University of Tartu and the ECBHS, Tiigi 78, Tartu, 50410, Estonia. Kairi.Kreegipuu@ut.ee

Abstract

Manual reaction time (RT) and visual evoked potentials (VEP) were measured in motion onset and offset detection tasks. A considerable homology was observed between the temporal structure of RTs and VEP intervals, provided that the change in motion was detected as soon as the VEP signal has reached critical threshold amplitude. Both manual reactions and VEP rise in latency as the velocity of the onset or offset motion decreases and were well approximated by the same negative power function with the exponent close to -2/3. This indicates that motion processing is normalised by subtracting the initial motion vector from ongoing motion. A comparison of the motion onset VEP signals in two different conditions, in one of which the observer was instructed to abstain from the reaction and in the other to indicate as fast as possible the beginning of the motion, contained accurate information about the manual response.

References

  1. Exp Brain Res. 1999 Feb;124(3):391-4 [PMID: 9989445]
  2. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Feb;4(2):42-50 [PMID: 10652521]
  3. Hum Brain Mapp. 2002 Jun;16(2):104-18 [PMID: 11954060]
  4. Biomed Biochim Acta. 1988;47(8):753-60 [PMID: 3240305]
  5. Vision Res. 1985;25(9):1297-304 [PMID: 4072010]
  6. Percept Psychophys. 1993 Dec;54(6):733-50 [PMID: 8134243]
  7. J Neurosci. 2002 Apr 15;22(8):3189-205 [PMID: 11943820]
  8. Vision Res. 1992 Sep;32(9):1789-91 [PMID: 1455751]
  9. Doc Ophthalmol. 1998-1999;97(2):121-34 [PMID: 10765966]
  10. J Neurophysiol. 1997 Jul;78(1):516-20 [PMID: 9242299]
  11. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1983 Apr;55(4):468-84 [PMID: 6187540]
  12. Physiol Res. 2002;51(2):199-204 [PMID: 12108931]
  13. Vision Res. 2000;40(4):409-15 [PMID: 10820621]
  14. Vision Res. 1984;24(2):99-101 [PMID: 6710880]
  15. Brain Res. 1972 Jan 14;36(1):59-70 [PMID: 5008385]
  16. Physiol Res. 1998;47(4):265-70 [PMID: 9803473]
  17. Neurosci Res. 2002 Oct;44(2):195-205 [PMID: 12354634]
  18. Vision Res. 2006 Feb;46(3):336-45 [PMID: 16005042]
  19. Eur J Neurosci. 2000 Jan;12(1):273-82 [PMID: 10651882]
  20. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2002 Apr;13(2):241-7 [PMID: 11958967]
  21. Vision Res. 1982;22(1):61-8 [PMID: 7101752]
  22. Vision Res. 1998 Sep;38(17):2569-73 [PMID: 12120628]
  23. Psychol Rev. 1980 Sep;87(5):435-69 [PMID: 7413887]
  24. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2001 Apr;107(1-3):69-94 [PMID: 11388143]
  25. Vision Res. 2004 Jan;44(2):119-34 [PMID: 14637362]
  26. Science. 2003 Oct 31;302(5646):878-81 [PMID: 14500849]
  27. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002 Oct;113(10):1586-97 [PMID: 12350435]
  28. Brain Res. 1998 Apr 20;790(1-2):195-201 [PMID: 9593892]
  29. Doc Ophthalmol. 1992;80(1):83-9 [PMID: 1505342]
  30. Neurosci Res. 2003 Sep;47(1):109-16 [PMID: 12941452]

MeSH Term

Adult
Evoked Potentials, Visual
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Motion Perception
Reaction Time
Time Factors

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0motionVEPonsetreactiontimevisualevokedoffsetmanualManualRTpotentialsmeasureddetectiontasksconsiderablehomologyobservedtemporalstructureRTsintervalsprovidedchangedetectedsoonsignalreachedcriticalthresholdamplitudereactionsriselatencyvelocitydecreaseswellapproximatednegativepowerfunctionexponentclose-2/3indicatesprocessingnormalisedsubtractinginitialvectorongoingcomparisonsignalstwodifferentconditionsoneobserverinstructedabstainindicatefastpossiblebeginningcontainedaccurateinformationresponseDetectionoffset:potentialanalysis

Similar Articles

Cited By