Identity matching-to-sample with olfactory stimuli in rats.

Tracy Peña, Raymond C Pitts, Mark Galizio
Author Information
  1. Tracy Peña: Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Wilmington, USA.

Abstract

Identity matching-to-sample has been difficult to demonstrate in rats, but most studies have used visual stimuli. There is evidence that rats can acquire complex forms of olfactory stimulus control, and the present study explored the possibility that identity matching might be facilitated in rats if olfactory stimuli were used. Four rats were trained on an identity match-to-sample procedure with odorants mixed in cups of sand as stimuli. Digging in the sample cup produced two comparison cups, and digging in the comparison cup that contained the same scent as the sample was reinforced. When criterion accuracy levels were reached, novel stimuli were added to the baseline training regimen. All 4 rats reached terminal performance of above 90% correct matching with more than 20 different baseline stimuli and matched novel stimulus combinations with above-chance accuracy; 3 of the 4 rats matched novel stimuli at levels significantly above chance. Accurate matching performance was demonstrated both with 2- and 3-comparison procedures. These results suggest that generalized matching-to-sample can be observed in rats when olfactory stimuli are used and, furthermore, that multiple-exemplar training may be important for its emergence.

References

  1. Nature. 1999 Feb 18;397(6720):613-6 [PMID: 10050854]
  2. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 May;59(3):471-82 [PMID: 8315365]
  3. Behav Neurosci. 1987 Aug;101(4):587-90 [PMID: 3651236]
  4. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1988 Apr;14(2):140-5 [PMID: 3367100]
  5. Science. 1976 Jan 30;191(4225):408-9 [PMID: 17782921]
  6. J Exp Anal Behav. 2000 May;73(3):305-18 [PMID: 10866354]
  7. J Neurosci. 2000 Apr 15;20(8):2964-77 [PMID: 10751449]
  8. Behav Neurosci. 1992 Oct;106(5):762-75 [PMID: 1445656]
  9. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Apr 6;101(14):5064-8 [PMID: 15051876]
  10. Psychol Rec. 2014 Dec;64(4):693-702 [PMID: 25435596]
  11. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 May;29(3):565-601 [PMID: 16812079]
  12. J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 Jul;68(1):27-45 [PMID: 16812849]
  13. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1975 Oct;1(4):326-34 [PMID: 811754]
  14. Behav Neurosci. 1998 Aug;112(4):762-71 [PMID: 9733185]
  15. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2002 Oct;28(4):358-68 [PMID: 12395493]
  16. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jan;21(1):19-26 [PMID: 4204143]
  17. Physiol Behav. 1993 Apr;53(4):795-804 [PMID: 8511188]
  18. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1997 Oct;23(4):417-33 [PMID: 9411018]
  19. Nature. 1996 Jan 18;379(6562):255-7 [PMID: 8538790]

Grants

  1. R15 DA012879/NIDA NIH HHS
  2. DA12879/NIDA NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Animals
Behavior, Animal
Concept Formation
Discrimination, Psychological
Male
Rats
Rats, Sprague-Dawley
Smell
Social Behavior
Social Identification

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0ratsstimuliolfactorymatching-to-sampleusedmatchingnovelIdentitycanstimulusidentitycupssamplecupcomparisonaccuracylevelsreachedbaselinetraining4performancematcheddifficultdemonstratestudiesvisualevidenceacquirecomplexformscontrolpresentstudyexploredpossibilitymightfacilitatedFourtrainedmatch-to-sampleprocedureodorantsmixedsandDiggingproducedtwodiggingcontainedscentreinforcedcriterionaddedregimenterminal90%correct20differentcombinationsabove-chance3significantlychanceAccuratedemonstrated2-3-comparisonproceduresresultssuggestgeneralizedobservedfurthermoremultiple-exemplarmayimportantemergence

Similar Articles

Cited By