Haplotype block structure is conserved across mammals.

Victor Guryev, Bart M G Smits, Jose van de Belt, Mark Verheul, Norbert Hubner, Edwin Cuppen
Author Information
  1. Victor Guryev: Hubrecht Laboratory, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Abstract

Genetic variation in genomes is organized in haplotype blocks, and species-specific block structure is defined by differential contribution of population history effects in combination with mutation and recombination events. Haplotype maps characterize the common patterns of linkage disequilibrium in populations and have important applications in the design and interpretation of genetic experiments. Although evolutionary processes are known to drive the selection of individual polymorphisms, their effect on haplotype block structure dynamics has not been shown. Here, we present a high-resolution haplotype map for a 5-megabase genomic region in the rat and compare it with the orthologous human and mouse segments. Although the size and fine structure of haplotype blocks are species dependent, there is a significant interspecies overlap in structure and a tendency for blocks to encompass complete genes. Extending these findings to the complete human genome using haplotype map phase I data reveals that linkage disequilibrium values are significantly higher for equally spaced positions in genic regions, including promoters, as compared to intergenic regions, indicating that a selective mechanism exists to maintain combinations of alleles within potentially interacting coding and regulatory regions. Although this characteristic may complicate the identification of causal polymorphisms underlying phenotypic traits, conservation of haplotype structure may be employed for the identification and characterization of functionally important genomic regions.

References

  1. Nat Genet. 2001 Oct;29(2):217-22 [PMID: 11586303]
  2. Science. 2002 Jun 21;296(5576):2225-9 [PMID: 12029063]
  3. Nat Genet. 2002 Jul;31(3):241-7 [PMID: 12053178]
  4. Nature. 2002 Dec 5;420(6915):574-8 [PMID: 12466852]
  5. Genome Res. 2003 Apr;13(4):721-31 [PMID: 12654723]
  6. Science. 2003 Dec 12;302(5652):1960-3 [PMID: 14671302]
  7. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jun 29;101(26):9734-9 [PMID: 15210992]
  8. Genome Res. 2004 Jul;14(7):1438-43 [PMID: 15231757]
  9. Nat Genet. 2004 Nov;36(11):1197-202 [PMID: 15489855]
  10. Genomics. 1995 Sep 20;29(2):311-22 [PMID: 8666377]
  11. Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Jun;62(6):1507-15 [PMID: 9585595]
  12. Hum Mol Genet. 2004 Dec 15;13(24):3089-102 [PMID: 15509594]
  13. Science. 2005 Feb 18;307(5712):1072-9 [PMID: 15718463]
  14. Science. 2005 Apr 1;308(5718):107-11 [PMID: 15705809]
  15. Nat Genet. 2005 Jun;37(6):601-6 [PMID: 15880103]
  16. Trends Genet. 2005 Jun;21(6):318-22 [PMID: 15922828]
  17. Science. 2005 Oct 14;310(5746):321-4 [PMID: 16224025]
  18. Nature. 2005 Oct 20;437(7062):1153-7 [PMID: 16237444]
  19. Genome Res. 2005 Nov;15(11):1519-34 [PMID: 16251462]
  20. Genome Res. 2005 Nov;15(11):1547-52 [PMID: 16251464]
  21. Nature. 2005 Oct 27;437(7063):1299-320 [PMID: 16255080]
  22. Nat Genet. 2005 Nov;37(11):1175-80 [PMID: 16254563]
  23. PLoS Biol. 2005 Nov;3(11):e378 [PMID: 16248677]
  24. Nat Genet. 2005 Dec;37(12):1367-71 [PMID: 16282975]
  25. Nature. 2005 Dec 8;438(7069):803-19 [PMID: 16341006]
  26. BMC Genomics. 2005;6:170 [PMID: 16316463]
  27. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jan 3;103(1):135-40 [PMID: 16371466]
  28. Genome Res. 2006 Feb;16(2):208-14 [PMID: 16385099]
  29. PLoS Biol. 2006 Mar;4(3):e72 [PMID: 16494531]
  30. Nat Genet. 2005 Apr;37(4):429-34 [PMID: 15723063]

MeSH Term

Animals
Evolution, Molecular
Genetic Variation
Haplotypes
Humans
Linkage Disequilibrium
Mammals
Mice
Models, Genetic
Multigene Family
Polymorphism, Genetic
Rats
Recombination, Genetic
Species Specificity

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0haplotypestructureregionsblocksblockAlthoughHaplotypelinkagedisequilibriumimportantpolymorphismsmapgenomichumancompletemayidentificationGeneticvariationgenomesorganizedspecies-specificdefineddifferentialcontributionpopulationhistoryeffectscombinationmutationrecombinationeventsmapscharacterizecommonpatternspopulationsapplicationsdesigninterpretationgeneticexperimentsevolutionaryprocessesknowndriveselectionindividualeffectdynamicsshownpresenthigh-resolution5-megabaseregionratcompareorthologousmousesegmentssizefinespeciesdependentsignificantinterspeciesoverlaptendencyencompassgenesExtendingfindingsgenomeusingphasedatarevealsvaluessignificantlyhigherequallyspacedpositionsgenicincludingpromoterscomparedintergenicindicatingselectivemechanismexistsmaintaincombinationsalleleswithinpotentiallyinteractingcodingregulatorycharacteristiccomplicatecausalunderlyingphenotypictraitsconservationemployedcharacterizationfunctionallyconservedacrossmammals

Similar Articles

Cited By